10605 2010-09-11 23:37:12 +0000 Typo: Replace 'the alt attribute's value may be omitted' with '@alt may be omitted' 2011-01-21 04:14:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC All CLOSED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#unknown-images a11y P3 normal LC 1 xn--mlform-iua ian ian laura.lee.carlson mike public-html-a11y public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking w3c xn--mlform-iua public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 38899 0 xn--mlform-iua 2010-09-11 23:37:12 +0000 #unknown-images ]]In such cases, the alt attribute's value may be omitted, but one of the following conditions must be met as well:[[ What does 'the alt attribute's value may be omitted' mean? I suppose that it was mean that the @alt attribute itself may be omitted. 39904 1 ian 2010-09-29 07:57:00 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. 39905 2 contributor 2010-09-29 07:58:33 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r5556. Check-in comment: omitting a content attribute value makes no sense http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5555&to=5556 40631 3 w3c 2010-10-05 12:01:09 +0000 Confirmation that this change made it into the W3C spec. 43358 4 w3c 2010-12-14 17:57:25 +0000 The bug is fixed, the bug-triage sub-team asks the reporter to close it.