10522 2010-09-01 12:36:20 +0000 Consider making iframe, noframes or noembed as the ancestor of a script prevent execution 2010-10-04 14:48:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All CLOSED WONTFIX P2 normal --- 1 hsivonen ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 38370 0 hsivonen 2010-09-01 12:36:20 +0000 When running a script, Gecko checks if the script has an iframe, noframes or noembed (in the HTML namespace) ancestor. If there is one, the script is marked as already started and the running steps are terminated. Please consider adding this to the spec. 39395 1 ian 2010-09-25 19:37:21 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I actually did consider this while designing this part of the spec. It would only matter for XHTML. XHTML content is not allowed to have descendants of <iframe>, and <noframes> and <noembed> are non-conforming anywhere, especially in XHTML where they have no effect on anything else either. I don't see much value therefore in adding code to handle this particular case, since it would only affect non-conforming XHTML content using obsolete features that never worked reliably in XML anyway, and it would still not solve the multitude of other similar issues with those elements (such as form controls still submitting, etc). 39714 2 hsivonen 2010-09-28 11:10:28 +0000 OK. I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600175