10456 2010-08-26 13:44:48 +0000 Should not emit ]] or ] when ]]EOF or ]EOF appears in the CDATA section state 2010-10-04 14:47:59 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other All RESOLVED WONTFIX P1 critical --- 1 hsivonen ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 37934 0 hsivonen 2010-08-26 13:44:48 +0000 I'm unhappy to see these tests results: Failure. Data: <svg><![CDATA[]] Expected: | <html> | <head> | <body> | <svg svg> | "]]" Got: | <html> | <head> | <body> | <svg svg> Expected errors: Actual errors: 5: Start tag seen without seeing a doctype first. Expected <!DOCTYPE html>. 16: End of file in a foreign namespace context. Failure. Data: <svg><![CDATA[] Expected: | <html> | <head> | <body> | <svg svg> | "]" Got: | <html> | <head> | <body> | <svg svg> Expected errors: Actual errors: 5: Start tag seen without seeing a doctype first. Expected <!DOCTYPE html>. 15: End of file in a foreign namespace context. The tests are correct per spec, but I think the V.nu behavior should be made correct, because so far we've adhered to the principle that a premature EOF shouldn't cause tokens to be emitted if those tokens wouldn't be emitted if the file had been seen to completion. 39357 1 ian 2010-09-25 16:28:01 +0000 How is this different from: <[EOF] (vs <p>) </[EOF] (vs </p>) &[EOF] (vs <) ...? Is the request here to change the CDATA section state to ignore one or two trailing "["s if an EOF was seen? That seems odd. We only make EOF drop stuff if we would otherwise always have eventually returned a non-character token yet the end of the token had not been seen yet. In this case, first the ]]> doesn't correspond to a token, and secondly if the next character adter "]]" is not ">", then the "]]" would be emitted as characters. So I'm not sure that what you describe makes sense. 39887 2 ian 2010-09-29 07:35:33 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: see comment 1