1044 2005-01-21 09:40:52 +0000 Case of RFC2119 terms 2005-04-28 11:53:52 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified QA QASpec-GL LC-2004-11-22 All All RESOLVED REMIND http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0009.html P2 minor --- 1 dom karl karl oldest_to_newest 2864 0 dom 2005-01-21 09:40:52 +0000 "3.2 Requirement A: Use a consistent style for conformance requirements and explain how to distinguish them." mentions that RFC2119 terms are uppercase, but it should be noted that nothing in RFC2119 (other than consistent usage as such) requires them to be used in uppercase, despite specifications frequently explicitly mentioning that they use lowercase variants instead. 4117 1 karl 2005-03-03 19:43:03 +0000 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0028.html http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1044 KD will rewrite the text [AI-20050214-4] and send it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21. 3919 2 dom 2005-03-21 14:03:32 +0000 http://www.w3.org/mid/7b37d825183d6e974d0b0bc3a64c0999@w3.org Text clarifies that using distinctive appearance (markup or font weight) is only the usual practice, rather than mandated. 3687 3 dom 2005-04-28 11:53:52 +0000 setting version to LC in case of future use