1039 2005-01-20 20:30:08 +0000 Section 8 is Incomplete 2008-12-02 22:45:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger martin.chapman zzz martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2858 0 gritzinger 2005-01-20 20:30:08 +0000 4195 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 21:14:40 +0000 From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt Requires technical discussion - conformance. 4024 2 martin.chapman 2005-03-08 10:53:11 +0000 Discussed at feb-mar 05 F2F: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Mar/att- 0001/Ws_Chor_f2f__Feb-Mar_2005_-0.txt SRT> WSDL Conformance: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#conformance http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/conform.html drafting a list based on those different conformance sections more discussion about what is a cdl processor what may be an endpoint projection, etc... (Steve is concatenating the ideas in a separate document) <SRT> Section 8 Conformance <SRT> A CDL document is an XML document that MUST conform to the XML syntax (see SVG or WSDL - to be filled in) <SRT> A CDL document is a document that MUST conform to the CDL syntax which may be checked by validating parsers and created by validating editors. <SRT> A CDL document MUST respect the extension rules defined in the CDL specification. <SRT> A CDL processor is defined as a compute node that executes all or some partial participant or role based projection of a CDL document. <SRT> A CDL processor MUST respect the semantics of the roles projected with respect to the CDL document and with respect to the operational semantics of CDL itself from which it is derived. <SRT> NOTE: The relationship between CDL and WSDL needs to be fleshed out here a little bit. <SRT> NOTE: We need to revisit the term "CDL processor" maybe the term "process" is better? 2746 3 steve 2005-06-13 14:49:15 +0000 PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT F2F June 2005: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/ 2005Jun/att-0010/2005-06-06_Contribution_to_WS-Chor_on_Conformance_section.doc AMENDMENT ONE - Change first paragraph of section 8.1 to the following text: "This section defines the conformance criteria that can be claimed for various CDL artifacts." AMENDMENT ONE - ADOPTED AMENDMENT TWO - Remove paragraph two from section 8.1 AMENDMENT TWO - ADOPTED AMENDMENT THREE - Replace both of section 8.2 with: "A CDL document conforms to the schema in appendix X plus the additional syntactic and semantic constraints defined in the specification text in sections 2 through Z. The root element must be package as defined in WS-CDL namespace. " AMENDMENT THREE - ADOPTED AMENDMENT FOUR - Replace section 8.3 with the following: "A conformant CDL endpoint is an entity that correctly implements the observable behavior of a role defined in a CDL choreography" Replace section heading with "Endpoint conformance" AMENDMENT FOUR - ADOPTED AMENDMENT FIVE - Remove section 8.4 AMENDMENT FIVE - ADOPTED 4312 4 martin.chapman 2005-06-20 20:41:52 +0000 at the June 2005 f2f we agreed to the text on conformance: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jun/att- 0003/June_2005_F2F_minutes_-_0.txt 4347 5 gritzinger 2005-06-24 21:09:14 +0000 Fixed as per comment above. 4600 6 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 15:28:55 +0000 Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005Jul/0002.html 4823 7 martin.chapman 2005-07-18 18:53:26 +0000 Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html