10346 2010-08-11 15:32:07 +0000 Should define 'class' better 2010-10-04 14:47:36 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED NEEDSINFO http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#classes P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian andy ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 37357 0 contributor 2010-08-11 15:32:07 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#classes Comment: Shoudl define clas better: "may be used for labelling, styling or indicating meaning" c/f use of class in microformats Posted from: 80.249.57.49 37358 1 andy 2010-08-11 15:37:39 +0000 For example: "may be used for labelling, styling or indicating meaning". c/f use of class in microformats 37359 2 andy 2010-08-11 15:50:17 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > For example: "may be used for labelling, styling or indicating meaning". > > c/f use of class in microformats See also issues described in http://microformats.org/2005/10/19/more-than-styling Perhaps the word "semantic" should be used? I've started a wiki page at http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Class 39155 3 ian 2010-09-21 18:04:47 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I don't understand the suggestions. Is the "may" in "may be used" intended to have the RFC2119 meaning? If so, is it intended to restrict or to allow? Or is this suggestion supposed to just be a non-normative description of the purpose of the attribute?