1023 2005-01-20 20:14:06 +0000 Question on constraint - Section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, last sentence 2005-08-03 15:44:46 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2842 0 gritzinger 2005-01-20 20:14:06 +0000 Section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, last sentence. Question on constraint "A specific Role Type MUST NOT be specified in more than one participantType element." What is the reason for this restriction? It would be reasonable to expect an organization to be more than one Participant Type, where these Participant Types have a common Role Type. 2889 1 martin.chapman 2005-01-25 20:38:12 +0000 requires technical discussion and/or justification 4180 2 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 21:01:36 +0000 From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt requires technical discussion and/or justification 4025 3 martin.chapman 2005-03-08 10:54:40 +0000 Discussed at feb-mar 05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Mar/att- 0001/Ws_Chor_f2f__Feb-Mar_2005_-0.txt Issue 1023: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1023 not related to yesterday's issue nick: channel has a roletype, if roletype belongs to two participant, we don't know which participant is targeted ... looks like a primer thing Martin: is the restriction removed, you can get from participant to role but not role to participant Nick: in the interact we are using From and TO: role but not participant <SRT> Gary says, wrt the current situation regarding 1023 "different participants could simply use the same interface, but use different role type names" Nick: 2.3.1. change "element declared within a Choreography Package" to "within a participant" Agreed 3433 4 martin.chapman 2005-05-10 15:36:58 +0000 Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005May/0012.html 4710 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-15 17:35:56 +0000 changed to resolved fixed 5354 6 martin.chapman 2005-08-03 15:44:46 +0000 Yin-Leng has confirmed the resolution is acceptable: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Aug/0019.html