<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1022</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-01-20 20:13:15 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Point of clarity - Section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-07-18 18:45:45 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS Choreography</product>
          <component>Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>--</target_milestone>
          <dependson>1018</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2841</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2005-01-20 20:13:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence.   
     Point of clarity   
   &lt;role type=&quot;qname&quot; /&gt;+   
   &quot;Each Role Type is specified by the type attribute of the role element&quot;   
   What is the relationship between the type attribute of this &lt;role&gt; element,
and the name attribute of &lt;roleType&gt; of section 2.3.1?   
   Need a statement clarifying the relationship explicitly rather than just by
example.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2888</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-01-25 20:36:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>editorial</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4179</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-02-14 21:00:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From meeting on 25-jan-05:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01-
25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt

Depends on the 1018 ? editorial.
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3898</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2005-03-11 18:07:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Add: &quot;This type attribute points to the name of a role element.&quot;

same applies for 2.3.2</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3065</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2005-05-25 20:42:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In section 2.3.3, 3rd paragraph, 2nd added sentence:  The &quot;qname&quot;
value of the &lt;z&gt;type&lt;/z&gt; attribute of the &lt;z&gt;role&lt;/z&gt; element MUST reference
the name of a roleType. 
 
Also added same sentence to penultimate paragraph of section 2.3.2
 
 Question: in section 2.3.3 

&lt;roleType name=&quot;Buyer&quot;&gt;

   . . .

&lt;/roleType&gt;

&lt;roleType name=&quot;SellerForBuyer&quot;&gt;

    &lt;behavior name=&quot;sellerForBuyer&quot; interface=&quot;rns:sellerForBuyerPT&quot;/&gt;

&lt;/roleType&gt;

&lt;roleType name=&quot;SellerForShipper&quot;&gt;

    &lt;behavior name=&quot;sellerForShipper&quot; interface=&quot;rns:sellerForShipperPT&quot;/&gt;

&lt;/roleType&gt;

&lt;roleType name=&quot;Shipper&quot;&gt;

   . . .

&lt;/roleType&gt;

&lt;relationshipType name=&quot;Buyer-Seller&quot;&gt;

    &lt;role type=&quot;tns:Buyer&quot; /&gt;

    &lt;role type=&quot;tns:SellerForBuyer&quot; /&gt;

&lt;/relationshipType&gt;

&lt;relationshipType name=&quot;Seller-Shipper&quot;&gt;

    &lt;role type=&quot;tns:SellerForShipper&quot; /&gt;

    &lt;role type=&quot;tns:Shipper&quot; /&gt;

&lt;/relationshipType&gt;

 

&lt;participantType name=&quot;Broker&quot;&gt;

   &lt;role type=&quot;tns:SellerForBuyer&quot; /&gt;

   &lt;role type=&quot;tns:SellerForShipper&quot; /&gt;

&lt;/participantType&gt;

 
should the two rns: name prefixes be tns: or are they deliberately
different?
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4587</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-14 15:23:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yin-Leng has been informed of the group&apos;s resolution to this issue [1].
changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-
comments/2005Jul/0002.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4810</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-18 18:45:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>