1020 2005-01-20 20:11:16 +0000 Information model - Section 2.3.2, last paragraph, 1st sentence 2005-07-18 18:45:06 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html P2 normal -- 1018 1 gritzinger martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2839 0 gritzinger 2005-01-20 20:11:16 +0000 Section 2.3.2, last paragraph, 1st sentence. Information model "Within each role element, the OPTIONAL attribute behavior identifies the commitment of a party as an XML-Schema list of behavior types belonging to this Role Type." If the list of behavior types are those "belonging to this Role Type", is this where a <role> is defined? Or is this <role> not the definition, but a reference to a Role Type defined by <roleType>? If it is the latter, how is this "list of behavior types" related to the <behavior> element of <roleType>? Should this "list of behavior types" be constraint to be a subset of the <behavior> elements of <roleType>? 2885 1 martin.chapman 2005-01-25 20:33:45 +0000 editorial 2886 2 martin.chapman 2005-01-25 20:33:56 +0000 editorial 4177 3 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:59:18 +0000 From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt Depends on the 1018 ? editorial. 3064 4 gritzinger 2005-05-25 20:40:27 +0000 Section 2.3.2 RelationshipTypes. Added at end of last paragragh:If the behavior attribute is present then the behaviors listed MUST be a proper subset of those belonging to this roleType. 4585 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 15:23:29 +0000 Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005Jul/0002.html 4808 6 martin.chapman 2005-07-18 18:45:06 +0000 Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html