10160 2010-07-14 07:20:57 +0000 Jack Bauer’s name is a poor example of using meta, as the content is already present 2010-10-05 13:03:16 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#examples-1 P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian a.kuckartz ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking w3.org public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 36827 0 contributor 2010-07-14 07:20:57 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#examples-1 Comment: Jack Bauer’s name is a poor example of using meta, as the content is already present Posted from: 222.147.252.201 by w3.org@boblet.net 36828 1 w3.org 2010-07-14 07:38:59 +0000 As Jack’s name is already in the content, it would be better to mark it up directly: <h1 itemprop="fn n"><span itemprop="given-name">Jack</span> <span itemprop="family-name">Bauer</span></h1> An alternative <meta> example might be: <div itemprop="n" lang="ja"> <meta itemprop="given-name" content="ジャック"> <meta itemprop="family-name" content="バウアー"> </div> Or: <meta itemprop="education" content="Master of Science degree in Criminology and Law"> 36992 2 w3.org 2010-07-19 04:01:29 +0000 My examples had some errors (missing n’s itemscope). here are the corrected versions: <h1 itemprop="fn"><span itemprop="n" itemscope><span itemprop="given-name">Jack</span> <span itemprop="family-name">Bauer</span></span></h1> An alternative <meta> example might be: <div itemprop="n" itemscope lang="ja"> <meta itemprop="given-name" content="ジャック"> <meta itemprop="family-name" content="バウアー"> </div> 37039 3 a.kuckartz 2010-07-21 11:09:05 +0000 A less controversial fictional or real figure than "Jack Bauer" should be used. If necessary I will raise that issue separately. 38616 4 ian 2010-09-08 06:59:44 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: I wonder why I did that. How weird. Regarding comment 3, please file separate bugs for each issue.