1015 2005-01-20 20:05:37 +0000 Point of clarity - Section 2.2.3, 5th paragraph. 2005-07-18 18:43:24 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html P2 normal -- 1016 1 gritzinger gritzinger martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2834 0 gritzinger 2005-01-20 20:05:37 +0000 Section 2.2.3, 5th paragraph. Point of clarity "Each definition type has its own name scope." What is a "definition type"? 2880 1 martin.chapman 2005-01-25 20:24:41 +0000 editorial 4171 2 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:50:59 +0000 From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt Editorial - remove word ?type?? Check schema. 3896 3 gritzinger 2005-03-11 17:59:20 +0000 Each WSCDL type definition has its own name scope. and: In 2.2.1 The Choreography Package contains the following WSCDL type definitions: 3060 4 gritzinger 2005-05-25 20:33:23 +0000 In 2.2.1 changed: The Choreography Package contains: to: The Choreography Package contains the following WS-CDL type definitions: 4582 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 15:21:57 +0000 Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005Jul/0002.html 4805 6 martin.chapman 2005-07-18 18:43:24 +0000 Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html