1014 2005-01-20 20:04:37 +0000 Point of clarity- Section 2.1, 1st bullet, last sentence 2005-07-18 18:42:41 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0022.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger gritzinger martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2833 0 gritzinger 2005-01-20 20:04:37 +0000 Section 2.1, 1st bullet, last sentence. Point of clarity "A Participant Type is grouping together those parts of the observable behavior that must be implemented by the same logical entity or organization" Up to this point, all the previous Types (Role Type, Relationship Type) have been defined in terms of "a party" whereas the definition of the Participant Type is in terms of a "logical entity or organization". There is no explanation on the relationship between "a party" and a "logical entity or organization". This explanation of a "Participant Type" needs to be related to "a party". 2879 1 martin.chapman 2005-01-25 20:24:21 +0000 editorial 4170 2 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:49:34 +0000 From meeting on 25-jan-05: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01- 25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt Editorial 3059 3 gritzinger 2005-05-25 20:32:01 +0000 Added to the end of paragraph in question: A logical entity or organization may represent more than one party within a Choreography. 4581 4 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 15:21:40 +0000 Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1]. changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005Jul/0002.html 4804 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-18 18:42:41 +0000 Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html