<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>10080</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-07-04 20:10:42 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>&quot;in body&quot; insertion mode, &quot;any other end tag&quot;, step 2.2 seems wrong.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-10-22 10:35:04 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#foster-parenting</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P1</priority>
          <bug_severity>critical</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>10063</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Eric Seidel">eric</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>contributor</cc>
    
    <cc>eric</cc>
    
    <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>Ms2ger</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>w3c</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>36572</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Eric Seidel">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2010-07-04 20:10:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>&quot;in body&quot; insertion mode, &quot;any other end tag&quot;, step 2.2 seems wrong:

2. If node has the same tag name as the token, then:

2.1 Generate implied end tags.

2.2 If the tag name of the end tag token does not match the tag name of the current node, this is a parse error.

2.3 Pop all the nodes from the current node up to node, including node, then stop these steps.


2.2. should instruct implementors to abort the steps after the parse error, since reaching 2.3, having already popped the node in 2.1 will fail?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>36586</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Pieters">zcorpan</who>
    <bug_when>2010-07-05 14:02:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The steps shouldn&apos;t be aborted, but 2.1 should say to generate implied end tags except the tag name of the current token. I think jgraham has already filed a bug for that.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>36716</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Eric Seidel">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2010-07-09 06:40:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 10078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>36861</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2010-07-14 19:14:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Concurred with comment 1.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>36862</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2010-07-14 19:14:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Checked in as WHATWG revision r5162.
Check-in comment: Change the &apos;end tag&apos; processing to not imply its own end tag, since that makes no sense. (Only affects parsing of rp and rt elements.) Also clean up the way categories are references to avoid too many negatives, and put option and optgroup in the &apos;special&apos; category (should have no effect in practice). And make a loop use a label rather than jumping to a numbered step.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5161&amp;to=5162</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>41665</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ms2ger">Ms2ger</who>
    <bug_when>2010-10-22 10:35:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 10079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>