1008 2005-01-10 16:07:23 +0000 FAULT HANDLING 2005-08-02 14:01:41 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Windows 2000 CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0012.html P2 normal -- 1 martin.chapman martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2818 0 martin.chapman 2005-01-10 16:07:23 +0000 The current spec defines WSDL1.1 faults using the InformationType to relate to the appropriate WSDL Message Type. However, if an operation has multiple faults, each with the same Message Type, then the only thing that distinguishes them is the fault name. However, the 'interaction' syntax does not support specifying a name associated with the "respond" exchange, when it is receiving a fault - it only specifies the Information Type, which in turn only links to the WSDL message type. The actual fault name is not referenced anywhere. For consistency across WSDL1.1 and WSDL2, perhaps the InformationType could refer to the actual type structure (which would be a change related to the WSDL2 support in the current spec), and then the 'exchange' is changed so that when it is used to receive a fault (i.e. an ExceptionType), the name field is the actual fault name - which could map onto WSDL1.1 and WSDL2. Regards Gary and Steve 4168 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:42:29 +0000 From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Discussion deferred as deemed to be a technical issue. 2752 2 steve 2005-06-13 15:39:45 +0000 PROPOSAL SOURCES: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005May/0074.html ADOPTED 4314 3 martin.chapman 2005-06-20 20:47:40 +0000 agreed resolution/wording at the June 2005 F2F: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jun/att- 0003/June_2005_F2F_minutes_-_0.txt 4349 4 gritzinger 2005-06-24 21:11:19 +0000 Fixed as per comment above. 4630 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 16:22:48 +0000 group notification of status change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member- ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html 5326 6 martin.chapman 2005-08-02 14:01:41 +0000 no comments from group so closed confirmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html