1005 2005-01-10 16:04:47 +0000 WORKUNIT REPETITION 2005-08-02 13:37:45 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Windows 2000 CLOSED WONTFIX http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0009.html P2 normal -- 1 martin.chapman martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 2815 0 martin.chapman 2005-01-10 16:04:47 +0000 Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics for repetition: > > We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for non-repeating, > and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend not to have > two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and non-repeating by: > > repeat = true|false Regards Gary and Steve 4165 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 20:39:17 +0000 From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Discussion deferred as deemed to be a technical issue. 4306 2 martin.chapman 2005-06-20 20:20:35 +0000 agreed to close wontfix at june f2f: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jun/att- 0003/June_2005_F2F_minutes_-_0.txt 4623 3 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 16:16:21 +0000 group notification of status change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member- ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html 5311 4 martin.chapman 2005-08-02 13:37:45 +0000 no comments from group so closed confirmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html