Edit ISSUE-323: Note should not use normative compliance keywords.





Raised By:


Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 31/7/2014 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-30) (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-30)
  2. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 24/7/2014 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-23) (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-23)
  3. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 17/7/2014 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-16) (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-16)
  4. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 10/7/2014 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-09) (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2014-07-09)
  5. ISSUE-323 (Content Processor behaviour is normative): Content Processor behaviour is normative [TTML2] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-07-09) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-07-09)

Related notes:

Fixed. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/a3889aab0c75

Glenn Adams, 17 Jul 2014, 04:41:17

The edit has removed the normative conformance language however there is now a (new?) outstanding question: should processor behaviour relative to the version attribute be normative or informative. I see there's an editor's note too, to the effect that if it should be informative only the attribute should be moved to the ttm namespace. I'm not sure of which direction we should go in here - it will be for the group to resolve.

Nigel Megitt, 17 Jul 2014, 11:18:34

The original issue was fixed. The larger issue raised in your note is a subject of Issue 276.

Glenn Adams, 31 Jul 2014, 04:19:32

See Issue-276

Nigel Megitt, 31 Jul 2014, 14:55:09

David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Chairs, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Atsushi Shimono <atsushi@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $