AI-generated software and Web standardization

W3C Breakouts Day 2026

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>

AI is eating Software (?)

Claude Code GitHub Commits Over Time - growing exponentially from 0 to 135K per day between March 2025 and Feb 2026

4% of commits on GitHub generated by Claude Code (and growing fast)

Developers & AI

Responses to “Do you currently use AI tools in your development process?” shows 47% using it daily, 18% weekly, 14% monthly - totalling to 84% 2025 StackOverflow survey

Web Standards target Software Development

AI-Generated Code & Implementations

The FastRender repo uses git submodules to include relevant specifications, including csswg-drafts, tc39-ecma262 for JavaScript, whatwg-dom, whatwg-html and more

FastRender: a browser [*] built by thousands of parallel agents

Specs are the new code

[*] although not a production ready browser by any mean

AI-Generated Code & Implementations

HTML5 is extremely well-specified, with a long specification and thousands of treebuilder and tokenizer tests available in the html5lib-tests repository.

How I wrote JustHTML using coding agents

AI-Generated Code & Integration

[It] can take years of Interop work to get a feature to the point it becomes “Baseline newly-available”. […] If it’s not in the LLM training data, it doesn’t exist.
Developer experience features (syntactic sugar, convenience APIs) are competing against established […] patterns in LLM training data

Dead framework theory

(see also Docs CG discussion on impact on documentation)

AI-Generated Code & Integration (A11Y)

The [...] results suggest that objective error count is too high to rely on LLM technology at all in digital accessibility work, even under explicit expert guidance.
WebAccessBench: Digital Accessibility Reliability in LLM-Generated Web Interfaces

AI-Generated Code & Integration (A11Y)

LLMs excel at addressing basic accessibility requirements but struggle with complex accessibility requirements, particularly ARIA-related attributes, performing worse than human developers.
Advanced prompting techniques consistently generate code with lower accessibility issues than human-written code [but with] inherent limitations in addressing accessibility through prompting alone.
Human or LLM? A Comparative Study on Accessible Code Generation Capability

Web Techs dominates code

Stacked line charts of programming languages identified in the Software Heritage archive over time, with HTML, JSON, JavaScript and XML summing up to well over 50%
Evolution of the percentage of files for programming, markup, and data languages from 2000 to 2021 from 50 Years of Programming Language Evolution through the Software Heritage looking glass

Questions