12:52:51 RRSAgent has joined #apa 12:52:55 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/08/19-apa-irc 12:52:55 RRSAgent, make logs Public 12:52:56 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina 12:52:59 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 12:52:59 agenda+ [TPAC 2026](https://www.w3.org/events/tpac/2026/tpac-2026/) 12:52:59 agenda+ New charters review 12:52:59 agenda+ New on TR 12:52:59 agenda+ [Spec review requests](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues) 12:53:02 agenda+ [Issue tracking](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues) 12:53:04 agenda+ CSS Update (Paul) 12:53:07 agenda+ Actions Checkin 12:53:09 agenda+ Other business 12:53:12 agenda+ Be done 13:49:42 Fazio has joined #apa 13:57:40 present+ 13:59:30 PaulG has joined #apa 13:59:50 JenStrickland has joined #apa 13:59:55 present+ 14:00:15 present+ 14:01:38 JeffAdams-UN has joined #apa 14:02:27 Meeting: APA Weekly Teleconference 14:02:27 matatk has joined #apa 14:02:33 Date: 19 Aug 2026 14:03:32 Chair: Janina 14:04:17 marcelo has joined #apa 14:04:25 present+ 14:04:30 present+ 14:05:30 scribe+ 14:05:38 present+ 14:06:32 zakim, who's here? 14:06:32 Present: janina, JenStrickland, PaulG, marcelo, JeffAdams-UN, matatk 14:06:34 On IRC I see marcelo, matatk, JeffAdams-UN, JenStrickland, PaulG, Fazio, RRSAgent, Zakim, jamesn, bkardell, janina, wendyreid, gb, Roy_Ruoxi, alice, nicolo-ribaudo, vmpstr, 14:06:34 ... jyasskin, Rachael, astearns, alastairc, chrishtr, slightlyoff 14:06:50 Neha has joined #apa 14:08:32 zakim, who's here? 14:08:32 Present: janina, JenStrickland, PaulG, marcelo, JeffAdams-UN, matatk 14:08:34 On IRC I see Neha, marcelo, matatk, JeffAdams-UN, JenStrickland, PaulG, Fazio, RRSAgent, Zakim, jamesn, bkardell, janina, wendyreid, gb, Roy_Ruoxi, alice, nicolo-ribaudo, vmpstr, 14:08:34 ... jyasskin, Rachael, astearns, alastairc, chrishtr, slightlyoff 14:09:27 present+ 14:10:01 JonCohn has joined #APA 14:10:07 Vanessa4 has joined #apa 14:10:09 present+ 14:10:16 present+ 14:10:16 zakim, who's here? 14:10:16 Present: janina, JenStrickland, PaulG, marcelo, JeffAdams-UN, matatk, Fazio, JonCohn, Vanessa 14:10:18 On IRC I see Vanessa4, JonCohn, Neha, marcelo, matatk, JeffAdams-UN, JenStrickland, PaulG, Fazio, RRSAgent, Zakim, jamesn, bkardell, janina, wendyreid, gb, Roy_Ruoxi, alice, 14:10:18 ... nicolo-ribaudo, vmpstr, jyasskin, Rachael, astearns, alastairc, chrishtr, slightlyoff 14:13:41 present+ 14:17:19 zakim, next item 14:17:19 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 14:18:23 AUR docs list: https://www.w3.org/WAI/research/user-requirements/ (and other resources too) 14:18:32 janina: Call for Consensus forthcoming from Research Questions Task force for gaming accessibility user requirements 14:18:37 zakim, next item 14:18:37 agendum 2 -- [TPAC 2026](https://www.w3.org/events/tpac/2026/tpac-2026/) -- taken up [from janina] 14:19:23 janina: Reminding people to register for room since host hotel rooms tend to book up quickly 14:19:38 q? 14:19:44 q? 14:19:47 janina: Continuing to work on sessions and breakouts 14:21:16 zakim, next item 14:21:16 agendum 3 -- New charters review -- taken up [from janina] 14:21:59 matatk: No new charters this week 14:22:54 matatk: Talking with the Immersive Web Working Group about their chater and had some architectural questions for them. They have made some clarifications 14:23:06 matatk: Spatial CSS is going to be intersting to watch 14:23:38 zakim, next items 14:23:38 I don't understand 'next items', JeffAdams-UN 14:23:42 zakim, next item 14:23:42 agendum 4 -- New on TR -- taken up [from janina] 14:24:09 zakim, close this item 14:24:09 agendum 4 closed 14:24:10 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:24:10 5. [Spec review requests](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues) [from janina] 14:24:21 zakim, next item 14:24:21 agendum 5 -- [Spec review requests](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues) -- taken up [from janina] 14:26:08 zakim, close this item 14:26:08 agendum 5 closed 14:26:09 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:26:09 6. [Issue tracking](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues) [from janina] 14:26:18 zakim, next item 14:26:18 agendum 6 -- [Issue tracking](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues) -- taken up [from janina] 14:26:40 subtopic: WebMCP: accTree question 14:26:41 https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues/317 14:27:31 matatk: They closed thread on their end and said it's not anything to do with the accessibility tree, which is the answer that we wanted. 14:27:32 q+ 14:27:45 ack janina 14:28:32 janina: We should acknowledge that we were getting ready to make a comment in that direction and we're in agreement. It should be clear we didn't ignore it. 14:29:21 janina: Will draft the comment 14:30:07 subtopic: WebMCP (as a whole) 14:30:08 https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues/318 14:30:28 That tracking thread links to the google doc we started to work on the comment: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Y5X5npxGePkU7andL1ibvi7-JX25frel6wFUNcAizg 14:31:58 q+ 14:32:20 matatk: Dr Keith added comment on financial processes. Marcelo added expanded questions about the browser to make an argument for browser being required to provide definite UI to humans. 14:33:54 matatk: Rare in standards to specify a tight level of what UI should be so people can experiment as well as pragmatic reasons. Most of questions are in as they were but open ended to WebMCP team can come back with how they'd solve the problem 14:35:00 matatk: More expansion on how assistive tech perceives the page in the first place. 14:36:49 q? 14:37:01 ack mar 14:37:04 matatk: Section called deployment/web content authoring question also from Marcelo. Propsing we take that section out for possibly later. 14:37:51 marcelo: Doesn't object to removal. Main reason thought important was to ensure there's equitable experience for assistive technology users. Wanted to engage on that early on 14:37:54 q+ 14:38:58 matatk: Thinks its covered by high level question with how will people who use assistive technology get the same information as people who do not. 14:38:59 q+ 14:39:05 ack janina 14:40:05 janina: IT's a key point we'll likely keep coming back to 14:40:12 ack PaulG 14:40:16 q?ack pa 14:41:20 q+ 14:41:40 PaulG: Want to make sure we're respecting the boundary of what WebMCP is proposing. If we're discussing what an agent needs to do, we've crossed the boundray. If there's advertising that WebMCP capabilities are available, that should be human readable. 14:41:45 ack marcelo 14:43:04 q+ to talk about WebMCP vs MCP, and developer use cases 14:43:14 ack ma 14:43:14 matatk, you wanted to talk about WebMCP vs MCP, and developer use cases 14:43:20 marcelo: MCP protocol has an extension called MCP apps. Idea is that LLM agent can access API via the protocol. What they get from backend, agent decides how to display that data to user. That transition may have different tools. The way we've been expericing the MCP today will become more complex 14:43:59 MCP Apps extension documentation: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/extensions/apps/overview 14:45:40 matatk: It might not have been best idea to call this WebMCP because it's similar but not an exact mirror of it. This info is good context for us. Some discussion with proponents of WebMCP and it's mostly around what developers want to be able to have agents be able to do. This isn't in the documentation yet and we've asked for it. Seeing that 14:45:40 would probably help answer questions. 14:45:46 q? 14:48:28 matatk: Proposed to do 1) See if we can include Dr. Keith's mention of the WCAG success criterion on financial transactions. 2) Will post the contents of the google doc at the end of this week unless there are objections. Also, asking Paul to review use case coverage and extending for actions. 14:48:47 subtopic: [css-forms-1] Handle prefers-contrast and forced-colors by default 14:48:58 https://github.com/w3c/a11y-tracking/issues/341 14:50:35 matatk: Suggesting default style sheets 14:51:57 PaulG: Hard to know without seeing it. If it lands and there's a problem, they'll get bug reports. If they produce the calculations and say this reaches AA, this reaches AAA, that would be helpful. 14:52:09 +1 on suggesting the conformance levels AA, AAA 14:54:05 PaulG: Web platform test (WPT) is fantastic idea because if it doesn't meet its own criteria if it's not provable that's the whole point. 14:55:20 matatk: Invitation: if anything in the a11y tracking is of interest and you have thoughts, please add comments because its the APA space for discussing things. 14:55:32 zakim, end meeting 14:55:32 As of this point the attendees have been janina, JenStrickland, PaulG, marcelo, JeffAdams-UN, matatk, Fazio, JonCohn, Vanessa, Neha 14:55:34 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:55:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/08/19-apa-minutes.html Zakim 14:55:42 I am happy to have been of service, JeffAdams-UN; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 14:55:43 Zakim has left #apa 14:55:47 Neha has left #apa 15:00:58 rrsagent, bye 15:00:58 I see no action items