16:00:22 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 16:00:26 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-irc 16:00:27 enrico has joined #rdf-star 16:00:30 present+ 16:00:32 present+ 16:00:35 present+ 16:00:40 meeting: RDF & SPARQL WG 16:00:45 present+ 16:00:46 present+ 16:00:47 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 16:00:53 present+ 16:00:55 present+ 16:01:00 present+ 16:01:02 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/11e4d020-9c58-4fff-83c5-37c9e2502295/20260528T120000/ 16:01:03 clear agenda 16:01:03 agenda+ Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL 16:01:03 agenda+ Create a note on triple-term owlification -> 1 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/150 16:01:03 agenda+ RDF tests work -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 16:01:08 scribe: fsasaki 16:01:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:01:47 lisp has joined #rdf-star 16:01:52 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/05/21-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:01:52 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/06/04-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:02:08 Souri has joined #rdf-star 16:02:13 present+ 16:02:45 chair: ora 16:02:51 present+ 16:02:53 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:03:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:03:09 present+ 16:03:12 chair+ 16:03:14 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:03:22 present+ 16:03:49 present+ 16:04:26 q+ 16:04:27 Topic: Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL 16:04:32 ora: will discuss discrepancy between turtle and sparql syntax 16:04:33 ack pchampin 16:05:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:06:03 present+ 16:06:59 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:07:28 pfps has joined #rdf-star 16:07:28 present+ 16:07:37 present+ 16:10:23 q? 16:10:24 +1 to fix it 16:10:32 +1 as well 16:10:52 ora: suggest to look into how to fix the issues that pchampin described 16:11:14 (further discussions on what type of issues may appear) 16:11:32 q+ 16:11:32 q+ 16:11:42 ack AndyS 16:14:20 ack pchampin 16:14:24 ora: should for sure be addressed, this is all about interop 16:14:41 pchampion: meeting with thread modeling CG next week 16:14:51 ... timely to discuss this matter 16:15:49 q+ 16:15:50 q+ 16:16:06 ack ora 16:16:46 qq+ 16:17:11 q- 16:17:16 ack lisp 16:17:55 (discussions on how to move forward process wise) 16:19:32 q+ 16:19:36 q+ 16:19:39 ack pfps 16:20:27 ack TallTed 16:20:27 q+ 16:21:23 ack j 16:23:42 PROPOSAL: Resolve discrepancy between SPARQL and Turtle syntaxes 16:23:42 +1 16:23:46 +1 16:23:47 +1 16:23:47 +1 16:23:47 +1 16:23:48 +1 16:23:49 +1 16:23:49 +1 16:23:49 +1 16:23:49 +1 16:23:50 +1 16:23:50 +1 16:23:52 +1 16:23:53 +1 16:23:54 +1 16:23:55 +1 16:24:01 RESOLVED: Resolve discrepancy between SPARQL and Turtle syntaxes 16:24:11 +1 16:24:23 +1 16:24:31 q+ 16:24:37 ack AndyS 16:24:57 discussing the how of resolving the discrepancy 16:26:27 action: afs to make the change related to sparql and turtle syntax 16:26:28 Created -> action #193 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/193 16:27:05 q+ 16:27:16 ack niklasl 16:27:21 zakim, next agendum 16:27:21 agendum 1 -- Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:27:28 zakim, open agendum 2 16:27:28 agendum 2 -- Create a note on triple-term owlification -> 1 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/150 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:27:39 s|agendum 1 -- Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL -- taken up [from agendabot]| 16:27:47 niklasl: main issue I had: in which direction should the current doc go? 16:27:55 https://niklasl.github.io/rdf-struct-patterns/spec/ 16:29:05 niklasl: I think it should be a separate note 16:30:18 niklasl: would like to get input of people who want to help to improve the quality of the doc 16:31:55 q+ 16:31:58 ack ora 16:32:11 ora: note vs. member submission is an interesting question 16:32:28 ... member submission can be used to introduce s.t. for discussions 16:32:47 q+ 16:32:50 ... but not sure if there is a difference for an uniformed audience. 16:33:47 ack pchampin 16:33:52 ... for me having this as a note would be fine 16:34:14 pchampin: the WG needs to decide if we want to endorse this as a note 16:34:29 ... not everybody understands the difference between note and REC 16:34:38 ... another option may be a CG report 16:35:13 ... e.g. in rdf dev CG 16:35:38 q+ 16:35:53 ora: we will decide next week how to move forward 16:36:00 ack TallTed 16:37:07 ora: will discuss on mailing list 16:37:39 alternatively, niklasl, you could host a static HTML rendered offline by Respec 16:38:14 pchampin Ah, yes; good option. 16:38:20 zakim, next agendum 16:38:20 agendum 1 -- Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:38:27 zakim, open item 3 16:38:27 agendum 3 -- RDF tests work -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:38:30 zakim, open agendum 3 16:38:30 agendum 3 -- RDF tests work -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:38:50 s|agendum 1 -- Discrepancy between Turtle and SPARQL -- taken up [from agendabot]| 16:39:14 s|agendum 3 -- RDF tests work -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4| 16:39:20 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:39:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:39:34 q+ 16:39:46 ack AndyS 16:39:54 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/325 16:39:55 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/325 -> Pull Request 325 Align xml-canon to previous behavior (by afs) 16:40:20 az: tests were changed from previous behaviour 16:40:38 s/az:/AndyS: 16:42:58 q+ 16:43:16 ack rubensworks 16:43:32 rubenworks: tried to track down the reason for changes 16:43:39 ... need to figure out why it was changed 16:44:32 ora: so removing the one allows to become compliant with the rest of the test 16:44:58 rubenworks: yes. if we revert the specific change we may need to modify other spec tests 16:45:54 s/rubenworks/rubensworks 16:46:56 ora: if we put this back, the tests with annotation syntax become a problem? 16:47:03 AndyS: yes 16:48:42 ora: still not sure why there is a problem if we take the tests back 16:48:54 .. what is the bad thing if we removed the one item? 16:49:10 q+ 16:49:17 ack niklasl 16:49:41 AndyS: Gregg Kellog made the change 16:49:53 s/Kellog/Kellogg 16:50:03 q+ 16:50:24 niklasl: there may be arguments from certain use cases that would lead to issues 16:50:52 q+ 16:50:57 ack rubensworks 16:51:08 q+ 16:51:18 rubensworks: have with reverting the change 16:51:30 ... but it should come with a change in the rdf xml spec 16:51:41 q- 16:51:45 ack AndyS 16:52:19 AndyS: one cannot write the same RDF XML literal in a different document and inherent different namespaces 16:53:09 ... it ends up with what happens with n-triples in the tests 16:53:14 q+ 16:53:17 s/inherent/inherit/ 16:53:20 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-xml/issues/97 16:53:21 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-xml/issues/97 -> Issue 97 Clarification of rdf:XMLLiteral (by afs) 16:53:28 AndyS: for rubensworks there is an issue 16:54:07 ack pchampin 16:55:37 pchampin: may be that my parser is incorrect, it parses the current test 16:55:49 ... raises the question of namespace inheritance 16:55:58 q+ 16:56:07 ack enrico 16:56:21 enrico: got comments on RDF semantics doc 16:56:35 ... pchampin improved the changes 16:56:41 ... except for the first one 16:56:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2026May/0033.html 16:56:53 ... if everybody agrees I will merge the solution 16:57:24 ora: objections? 16:57:25 That’s the PR https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/195 16:57:25 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/195 -> Pull Request 195 Implementation of Michael Schneider's review on RDF-Semantics (by franconi) [Errata] [ms:REC] 16:57:54 no objections 16:58:05 ora: enrico, please go ahead 16:58:06 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:58:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:01:20 RRSAgent, bye 17:01:20 I see 3 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-actions.rdf : 17:01:20 ACTION: andy to make the change related to sparql and turtle syntax [1] 17:01:20 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-irc#T16-25-45 17:01:20 ACTION: AZ to make the change related to sparql and turtle syntax [2] 17:01:20 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-irc#T16-25-56 17:01:20 ACTION: afs to make the change related to sparql and turtle syntax [3] 17:01:20 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2026/05/28-rdf-star-irc#T16-26-27 17:01:23 zakim, bye 17:01:23 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been TallTed, enrico, rubensworks, niklasl, j, pchampin, gtw, fsasaki, Souri, Tpt, ora, doerthe, tl, ktk, AZ, pfps 17:01:23 Zakim has left #rdf-star