14:12:07 RRSAgent has joined #vcwg 14:12:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/05/27-vcwg-irc 14:12:11 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:12:12 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), ivan 14:12:52 Meeting: Verifiable Credentials Working Group Telco 14:12:52 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/d811d954-dd65-4cce-844a-53dfd95e75c7/20260527T110000/ 14:12:52 chair: brentz 14:12:52 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2026-05-27: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/d811d954-dd65-4cce-844a-53dfd95e75c7/20260527T110000/ 14:15:42 dmitriz has joined #vcwg 14:31:49 bigbluehat has joined #vcwg 14:52:31 brent has joined #vcwg 14:59:34 phila has joined #vcwg 14:59:51 present+ 15:00:08 present+ 15:00:17 KevinDean has joined #vcwg 15:01:26 present+ 15:01:40 present+ 15:01:43 JoeAndrieu has joined #vcwg 15:02:13 present+ brent 15:02:46 wes-smith has joined #vcwg 15:02:54 present+ wes-smith 15:03:10 present+ KevinDean 15:03:19 scribe+ 15:03:19 elaine has joined #vcwg 15:03:25 present+ 15:03:51 phila: good day everyone 15:03:52 present+ elaine 15:03:58 present+ 15:04:06 present+ wip 15:04:16 i have no mic :( but am present 15:04:18 Wip3 has joined #vcwg 15:04:20 phila: no one new here. 15:04:29 ... all we're planning to do here is to talk about next week 15:04:33 ... in Brussels 15:05:01 ... and a quick round up with Task Forces 15:05:05 q+ 15:05:05 ... Anything to add? 15:05:10 ack manu 15:05:19 manu: the quantum resistant spec people picked a name 15:05:27 ... I'd like to put that in front of the group 15:05:33 phila: sure. 15:05:47 ... So just a bit of time about next week's meeting. 15:05:56 ... for some, that's a remote participation. for some face to face 15:06:10 ... should be fully able to join, modulo timezones 15:06:38 ... We've given the address. There's a person at reception who should expect you. 15:06:46 ... Go to fifth floor (they'll know that) 15:07:00 yes 15:07:02 ... Is it still the case that the barcode & data integrity group want to meet Monday afternoon 15:07:17 present+ kezike 15:07:20 ... Yes, it is. Great. I'll see you on Monday afternoon 15:07:28 present+ jennie 15:07:31 ... Set for 2pm local time 15:07:40 kezike has joined #vcwg 15:07:45 ... Then we kick off properly tuesday morning 15:07:48 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-0OXOR5NsY-OlC0i26mCDK45B15j2BfkL8f2CIY30E/edit?gid=0#gid=0 15:07:50 present+ 15:07:51 ... a small change in the agenda 15:08:23 ... the thing that got switched around, which I'm concerned about, because Susanna is able to join on Wed morning 15:08:33 ... The problem is the other person, can't be there Wed 15:08:38 Caroline: Yes, I can. 15:08:45 phila: Great! That fixes that. 15:08:51 q+ 15:08:55 ack KevinDean 15:08:58 s/Caroline/Carolynn/ 15:09:00 Carolynn has joined #vcwg 15:09:05 KevinDean: I might be able to join remotely for DPP 15:09:07 present+ Carolynn 15:09:28 phila: the agenda was worked out primarily based on timezone of remote participants 15:09:37 ... that's why Confidence Method is AM and render method is afternoon 15:09:49 smccown has joined #vcwg 15:09:57 ... Do take a quick look. Is there anything there that is going to upset anyone? 15:10:07 Carolynn: How can we see the agenda? 15:10:12 Phila: in the chat? 15:10:13 present+ mccown 15:10:21 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-0OXOR5NsY-OlC0i26mCDK45B15j2BfkL8f2CIY30E/edit?gid=0#gid=0 15:10:25 Carolynn: I see a link ... 15:10:34 Carolynn: Ah... now I see it. 15:10:51 phila: a couple other things. a relatively small group 15:11:06 ... the bad news is there is no cleaner. we are the cleaners. 15:11:12 ... WE put the plates in the dishwasher 15:11:32 ... The upside, when it gets to social event, GS1 is going to pay for that 15:11:56 ... Pay for the entry ticket. Not all the food, but the museum ticket. 15:11:58 Thank you to GS1 for covering everyone's entry ticket :) 15:12:00 Carolynn: On Wed? 15:12:12 phila: Yes, Wed afternoon. I'm booking tickets today. 15:12:23 ... down and Boors[sp?] 15:12:32 Carolynn: Can I invite a friend from the commission? 15:12:55 Phila: We leave the meeting at 3. So, yes, but I need to know that person. 15:12:57 Carolynn: Seth 15:13:06 phila: Seth Van Holland. Ok. Alright. 15:13:07 q+ 15:13:18 ack kezike 15:13:34 kezike: Is there going to be a room? 15:13:44 phila: yes, same link for remote participation 15:13:54 ivan: yes. that makes life simpler. 15:14:05 phila: Yes. a link in the calendar, and the same IRC channel as well 15:14:06 present+ 15:14:16 q+ 15:14:19 q+ 15:14:36 phila: also Tuesday, our CEO would like to come meet us over lunch. And a few other colleagues. 15:14:43 ack ivan 15:15:03 ivan: will there be some sort of AV equipment for remote participants to show up and participate 15:15:14 ack JoeAndrieu 15:15:16 phila: yes, there's a modern thing with the magical camera that points at speakers 15:15:57 JoeAndrieu: Disc golf on Friday 15:16:04 phila: Is everyone staying at the Moxi? 15:16:09 ivan: no 15:16:13 JoeAndrieu: no 15:16:17 Wip3: I will be 15:16:20 q+ 15:16:23 ack brent 15:16:43 brent: I want to reiterate that the task force leads to prepare for their session 15:16:47 present+ bigbluehat 15:17:03 ... for example, the VCALM TF is Wed. We are going to turn to you and say "Go" 15:17:20 ... we'll handle the queue, scribe, and logistics, but the actual content is up to the task force themselves 15:17:27 ... if you want slides, please make them 15:17:42 ... if you want a session focused on issues / prs, that's fine too 15:17:54 ... The chairs are not actively planning every session 15:18:05 q+ to clarify about use cases 15:18:12 ack JoeAndrieu 15:18:12 JoeAndrieu, you wanted to clarify about use cases 15:18:36 JoeAndrieu: Phil you got the Use Case conversation under control? 15:18:38 phila: Yes. 15:18:54 https://w3c.github.io/vc-dpp-bw/ucr/index.html 15:18:56 ... after introduction, we have a discussion of the uses case. 15:19:12 ... There is a new use case document for the business wallet 15:19:19 ... quite a lot of which are use cases for VCs 15:19:30 ... we need to think about which of those, if any, we are going to put in the primary use case document 15:19:39 ... given that we now have a lot of task forces in flight 15:19:47 ... with lots of different work going on. 15:19:55 ... maybe that means the use case document needs updating 15:20:08 ... I would ask, while you're traveling, at least skim that use case document? 15:20:23 https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-use-cases/ 15:20:30 q+ to ask the URLs on the web somewhere 15:20:35 ack JoeAndrieu 15:20:35 JoeAndrieu, you wanted to ask the URLs on the web somewhere 15:20:41 scribe+ 15:20:54 JoeAndrieu: Short request, can you get URLs in agenda or in calendar item? 15:21:04 JoeAndrieu: It will help people find the URLs. 15:21:21 phila: apart from that, we are pretty much ready to go. 15:21:34 phila: we'll deal with logistics on site. 15:21:52 scribe- 15:22:06 ... for remote participants, the equipment is up to date, and we will make every effort to include remote participants as equals so you feel valued, because you are 15:22:35 ... Usually the week after, there are no working meetings. I'd recommend cancelling the the week after. 15:22:47 ... Up to task force leaders to decide for their group 15:23:19 Carolynn: we discussed splitting the group, between two subjects separately. Combined vocabulary discussion isn't very productive at this point. 15:23:34 ... So, how can I control a meeting? I didn't send the invite, how would I cancel it? 15:23:41 phila: I can point you to it now. 15:23:42 https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/vc/task-forces/ 15:23:59 ... If you go to that URL, that has all the task forces. 15:24:19 ... Go to your task force, you'll see the calendar link. And you should be able to confirm/cancel whatever 15:24:24 q+ 15:24:33 ack ivan 15:24:36 ... What usually happens, you put the agenda in and mark it confirmed. 15:24:59 ivan: Question for Carolynn. The cut of the two topics, is that just separate meetings? 15:25:09 Carolynn: Yes, we are thinking a biweekly meeting for each. 15:25:22 ivan: We could also split that task force, but there aren't a lot of people to support that 15:25:31 Carolynn: We will also meet together sometimes 15:25:42 ivan: That is entirely between you can Carsten to set the agenda. 15:25:57 Carolynn: So we keep it as a weekly meeting, then set the agenda by editing the event 15:26:04 phila: Yes. Should be easy. 15:26:15 ivan: We meet in person next week, so let's do it in person. 15:26:21 Carolynn: Thanks. 15:26:27 phila: Any other questions for next week? 15:26:51 ... next up for task force 15:26:55 present+ 15:26:55 ... wait. before I do that. 15:27:01 Topic: Post Quantum 15:27:03 ... Manu you wanted to discuss the post-quantum 15:27:14 manu: thanks, Phil 15:27:44 ... Yesterday on data integrity task force call, we settled on Quantum Resistance Crypto Suites, as vc-di-quantum-resistant-1.0 15:28:01 phila: this has been around. incubated in CCG 15:28:08 q+ 15:28:16 manu: Yes. It's been around for a while. Ready to publish through this group. 15:28:20 ack ivan 15:28:24 phila: As it was moved, all the IP commitments were made. 15:28:26 manu: Yes 15:28:45 ivan: You've made all the admin steps? Publication either 16th or 18th of June 15:28:47 manu: Correct 15:29:06 phila: Any comments? before we formally put this to the group? 15:29:16 PROPOSAL: Publish the Quantum-Resistant Cryptosuites v1.0 specification (https://w3c.github.io/vc-di-quantum-resistant/) as a FPWD with a shortname of vc-di-quantum-resistant-1.0. 15:29:19 phila: Then I think we good to go 15:29:20 +1 15:29:23 +1 15:29:23 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:24 +1 15:29:26 +1 15:29:27 +1 15:29:33 +1 15:29:46 q+ 15:29:48 phila: congratulations. that's another FPWD from this group. 15:29:49 ack ivan 15:29:53 RESOLVED: Publish the Quantum-Resistant Cryptosuites v1.0 specification (https://w3c.github.io/vc-di-quantum-resistant/) as a FPWD with a shortname of vc-di-quantum-resistant-1.0. 15:30:21 ivan: Food for thought, Manu. Usually when there's an FPWD, there's news that W3C issues. A standard thing, an abstract of the spec 15:30:23 q+ 15:30:36 ... in view of quantum panic, is it worth asking the comm team to do something more than that? 15:30:38 ack manu 15:30:46 manu: Yes. I think that's a great idea. 15:31:00 ... it would signal to the greater web community that the W3C is working on post-quantum things 15:31:16 ivan: Ok. I will ping you when the time comes. 15:31:36 phila: That is interesting, because it does show that the group is working on the race between good guys and bad 15:31:57 phila: While you have the mic, Manu any news from the barcode and DI group? 15:31:59 q+ 15:32:08 manu: no, but I'll defer to Wes and Elaine 15:32:08 ack wes-smith 15:32:27 wes-smith: Plan for the week is to do what we've been doing: discussion, issues, PR processing 15:32:58 +1 15:32:59 ... we are looking for a forgery defense that plays well with QR codes, which happens to work well with post-quantum 15:33:12 I like the new "forgery defense" moniker... because it's not just about quantum resistance. 15:33:20 +1 15:33:25 ... Not sure if Greg Bernstein might have specific things to bring up 15:33:29 no mic! 15:33:53 phila: That's a Thursday morning meeting 15:34:09 scribe+ 15:34:29 JoeAndrieu: Denken and I don't have a full plan for next week yet, but I expect we're going to focus on the Realeyes PR. 15:35:08 q+ 15:35:12 q+ 15:35:13 phila: render method? I don't think we have Dmitri. Can anyone else talk about it? 15:35:19 q- 15:35:32 scribe- 15:35:34 bigbluehat: I'm happy to talk about render method 15:35:38 q? 15:35:43 ack bigbluehat 15:35:49 ... the group is trying to figure out what they can prune or not prune for the sandbox stuff 15:36:01 ... we are trying to figure out how many problems that approach solves 15:36:14 ... There's been discussion around how many things that can solve. 15:36:29 ... Also interest in other formats 15:36:42 ... So you can highlight important fields 15:36:55 ... Patrick St Louis has been talking about OCA bundles 15:37:17 ... Perhaps an approach about credential types 15:37:42 phila: Benjamin, can you talk with Dmitri about how you are going to use that time. 15:37:50 ... Carsten isn't on the call. Carolynn? 15:38:15 Carolynn: I just checked with Carsten. He's going to lead the wallet vocab on Wed morning next week. 15:38:24 ... I will lead follow up meeting on DPP 15:38:35 ... Content will be getting to know DPP team members and define the scope and related work 15:38:41 ... There is a lot of related work. 15:39:01 ... We need to list those and discuss how these different activities will affect what we are trying to do. 15:39:22 phila: That sounds like a good conversation for the hour 15 we have for you. Thank you 15:39:29 phila: Kayoda, VCALM? 15:39:50 s/Kayoda/Kayode/ 15:39:51 kezike: What we've been talking about recently, include Threat Modeling 15:40:00 ... Also test suite development. 15:40:13 ... There was a VCALM test suite under CCG. We've been working on refactoring that. 15:40:29 ... Third, is just maintenance of the spec. Issues and PR processing. 15:40:48 ... Manu proposed a way to categorize these as post 1.0, so its not a blocker for the current charter 15:41:06 ... I'll chat with Patrick and Manu about managing queue remotely 15:41:11 q+ 15:41:16 ... And we'll probably need to give a bit of background 15:41:35 phila: Yes. The group is too large for everyone to participate in all task forces, 15:41:55 ... This is the opportunity to share the work with participants in other task forces 15:42:04 q- 15:42:08 ... All of this work affects our peers work. 15:42:13 ... We're all in the VCWG. 15:42:46 phila: one request. I'm having difficulty hearing you. A microphone would make a big difference. 15:42:56 kezike: how about this? 15:43:02 phila: Yes, that's great. 15:43:07 ... next up Recognized Entities 15:43:18 manu: we are going to go over at a high level what this does 15:43:40 ... probably talk about alignment with GS1 and UN Grid use cases(?) 15:43:51 ... And threat model 15:44:09 ... If we have time, we'll focus on the issues we really need to address before candidate rec 15:44:10 q+ 15:44:13 ack brent 15:44:40 brent: Noting there is a VCALM session separately as a task force. There are also two threat modeling sessions 15:44:43 q+ 15:44:52 ack JoeAndrieu 15:45:32 JoeAndrieu: I think Simone is trying to be there in person. Might talk about VCALM earlier in the process... 15:45:57 JoeAndrieu: Simone has learned that being concrete early on is good, so VCALM is a good candidate. 15:46:27 phila: my aim while we are there. by the end of the day, we should get a sense of where the group is as a whole. 15:46:42 q+ to say we moved VCALM 15:46:57 phila: Also TPAC 15:47:12 q+ also to mention respect-threats 15:47:15 q+ to note some specs we'd like to get into CR by TPAC. 15:47:21 phila: we will have some in CR by TPAC 15:47:21 ack JoeAndrieu 15:47:21 JoeAndrieu, you wanted to say we moved VCALM and to mention respect-threats 15:47:30 q+ 15:48:09 JoeAndrieu: We did move VCALM to Thursday, so that's fine. 15:48:22 JoeAndrieu: Also finishing up respec-threats library so plan to spend some time on that in F2F. 15:49:16 JoeAndrieu: Eric also has some useful DFDs to discuss, but want to talk about overlap and Eric's work on threat models (top level diagram for moving parts) -- Eric broke it up into concrete use case, and diagram for each step, re-using same components... help us get to granularlity we need for threat analysis. 15:49:28 ack manu 15:49:28 manu, you wanted to note some specs we'd like to get into CR by TPAC. and to 15:49:29 JoeAndrieu: Folks might want to look at those diagrams before attending. 15:49:36 manu: +1 to that. 15:49:39 s/scribe-// 15:49:42 ... back to the question brent asked. 15:49:57 ... I heard Simone might be there in person. I'm happy to help. 15:50:04 ... I'll volunteer 15:50:47 ... Item 2. Yes, that's for the respec threat modeling extention. I'm going to try applying it to other work maybe to recognized entities. 15:51:23 phila: Benjamin, you were asking about the two spreadsheets. 15:51:33 ... Yes. Sorry about that. 15:51:45 bigbluehat: Any objections to me leaving signpost 15:51:47 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Emo_yVt90Z5xnHNBPhShO4B7zYQ7kwMfNcOa6sKAdoc/edit?gid=179611341#gid=179611341 15:51:55 phila: I'm not taking the attendance spreadsheet as final. 15:52:09 q+ 15:52:10 ... In particular, I'm using those numbers to book our tickets for the Wed evening 15:52:13 ack ivan 15:52:34 ivan: A practical thing. Unfortunately, it will be pretty rainy next week. Bring umbrellas! 15:52:43 Thanks, Ivan! 15:52:53 Topic: GS1/W3C workshop on Agentic AI for retail 15:52:55 https://w3c.github.io/ecommerce-for-humans-and-AI-Agents-workshop/ 15:52:56 phila: In case you don't know, it's wetter than London. 15:53:06 ... Completely separate topic, in case its of interest. 15:53:41 ... I am working with W3C on workshop in September about agentic AI, MCP, UCP, ACP< etc. I'm putting together the program. Bosch and Visa. 15:53:46 If that is of interest to you 15:53:51 q+ to ask about remote 15:53:55 ack JoeAndrieu 15:53:55 JoeAndrieu, you wanted to ask about remote 15:54:19 JoeAndrieu: remote participation for workshop 15:54:24 phila: Yes. 15:54:47 ... Thank you all. See you need week, in person or online. 15:54:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:54:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/27-vcwg-minutes.html ivan 15:56:15 Jem_ has joined #vcwg 15:58:53 rrsagent, bye 15:58:53 I see no action items