10:55:05 RRSAgent has joined #data-shapes 10:55:09 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/05/18-data-shapes-irc 10:55:09 zakim, start meeting 10:55:09 RRSAgent, make logs Public 10:55:10 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), AndyS 10:55:50 meeting: Data Shapes WG 10:55:50 agenda: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/agenda/admin/plenary-2026-05-18.md 10:55:50 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/05/11-data-shapes-minutes.html 10:55:50 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/05/25-data-shapes-minutes.html 10:56:13 agenda? 10:56:39 rrsagent, make logs public 10:56:57 rrsagent, please draft minutes 10:56:58 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/18-data-shapes-minutes.html AndyS 10:58:27 nicholascar has joined #data-shapes 10:58:46 HolgerK has joined #data-shapes 10:59:30 elianaP has joined #data-shapes 11:01:50 present+ 11:01:52 bergos has joined #data-shapes 11:01:57 present+ 11:02:02 present+ 11:02:06 present+ 11:02:07 present+ 11:02:38 present+ 11:02:46 simonstey has joined #data-shapes 11:02:59 scribe: simonstey 11:03:04 present+ 11:03:15 mgberg has joined #data-shapes 11:03:18 scribenick: simonstey 11:03:19 regrets for next week's plenary meeting 11:03:22 present+ 11:03:41 DavidHabgood has joined #data-shapes 11:03:53 topic: TR IRI 11:03:55 edmond has joined #data-shapes 11:04:06 present+ 11:04:37 nicholascar: all voted on FPWD, all have TR IRIs 11:04:41 present+ 11:04:56 ... profiles, UI, and overview haven't 11:05:18 ... later today we'd like to vote on FPWD for the remaining documents 11:05:39 ... we have to have an official vote recorded 11:06:00 q? 11:06:07 HolgerK: everything is stable for core, sparql and nodeexpr 11:06:42 ajnelson-nist: no update from last week, but otherwise I'm happy with profiles going fpwd 11:07:18 nicholascar: the overall mission of the profiling doc is there, PR was merged a few hours ago 11:07:38 edmond: UI is also ready, we had a few PRs merged and a few along the way 11:07:42 bergos: +1 11:08:11 AndyS: we already published and is already in TR, but not in the shape for wide review yet 11:08:28 q+ 11:08:44 q- 11:09:13 AndyS: held up by 1 PR 11:10:07 simonstey: was just approved now :) 11:10:48 AndyS: once that's gone in, I'll be able to point people at the shacl rules document for those interested 11:11:47 ... also working on updating the grammar, especially putting text about escape sequences (which is necessary for the security section) 11:12:11 ... (explaining obfuscation attack on SPARQL update) 11:12:18 topic: vote 11:12:24 q? 11:13:10 nicholascar: Does anybody on the call have any objections to any of those three documents? profiles, UI, overview 11:13:30 +1 11:13:42 Oggy has joined #data-shapes 11:13:43 s/+1// 11:13:43 nicholascar: does everybody approve the profiles, UI, and overview documents going out as FPWD? 11:13:50 +1 11:13:50 +1 11:13:50 +1 11:13:51 +1 11:13:51 +1 11:13:51 +1 11:13:52 +1 11:13:52 +1 11:13:54 +1 11:13:54 +1 11:13:55 +1 11:13:56 +1 11:14:35 RESOLUTION: the Profile, UI, and Overview document will be published 11:14:56 rrsagent, please draft minutes 11:14:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/18-data-shapes-minutes.html AndyS 11:15:03 s/published/published as FPWD 11:15:22 Overview is a Note draft though 11:15:40 rrsagent, please draft minutes 11:15:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/18-data-shapes-minutes.html AndyS 11:15:48 topic: wide review 11:16:00 nicholascar: we have a template for the wide reviews 11:16:19 ... not that thrilling at the moment as I haven't done much with them yet 11:17:56 ... In each of the documents, there are currently links to the previous approvals from previous ones. 11:18:55 ... And what I'm about to do is that some of those documents will be relevant; some of the decisions about previous reviews of the core and the SHACL documents will be relevant to these documents, just because we're sharing certain information across these documents. So if, for instance, all of our documents have certain parts of them that are the 11:18:55 same, then the approval should carry. 11:19:51 ... That review of accessibility may be relevant to the UI group. We'll leave that to the UI task force and the reviewing committee to work out whether it is. I personally don't think it's relevant. I think that the UI group will still only produce code and data. They're not producing actual UI elements, as far as I can tell. So we'll leave that to 11:19:51 them to work out. 11:20:27 q? 11:20:28 ... again, I'll just have to quickly try and work out whether the reviews are relevant, or whether these separate documents have separate lives which need to be dealt with. 11:21:02 ... The Rules document I'm going to put a big draft notice at the top. I've created the issue, but that doesn't mean that the wide review actually has to start. It will really only start when we actually submit 11:21:23 ... So I'm going to put down a request that they review by the end of July/June 11:21:34 ... And my hope is that by about the end of July, all of these reviews have been completed, 11:21:47 ... so that we've done the wide review, we've done all the community first public release, and that the process for getting these documents to be 11:21:55 ... Recommendations and Notes is well underway. 11:26:06 AndyS has joined #data-shapes 11:26:12 zakim, end meeting 11:26:12 As of this point the attendees have been caribou, ajnelson-nist, HolgerK, nicholascar, bergos, AndyS, simonstey, mgberg, edmond, DavidHabgood 11:26:14 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 11:26:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/05/18-data-shapes-minutes.html Zakim 11:26:22 I am happy to have been of service, AndyS; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 11:26:22 Zakim has left #data-shapes 11:26:24 rrsagent, please leave us 11:26:24 I see no action items