10:46:11 RRSAgent has joined #data-shapes 10:46:15 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/04/27-data-shapes-irc 10:46:15 zakim, start meeting 10:46:15 meeting: Data Shapes WG 10:46:15 agenda: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/agenda/admin/plenary-2026-04-27.md 10:46:15 RRSAgent, make logs Public 10:46:16 AndyS, sorry, https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/agenda/admin/plenary-2026-04-27.md doesn't seem to exist. 10:46:16 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/04/20-data-shapes-minutes.html 10:46:16 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2026/05/04-data-shapes-minutes.html 10:46:16 rrsagent, make logs public 10:46:17 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), AndyS 10:46:17 rrsagent, please draft minutes 10:46:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/27-data-shapes-minutes.html AndyS 10:46:25 agenda? 10:55:22 present+ 10:59:47 nicholascar has joined #data-shapes 11:00:05 chair: Nick 11:00:30 prezent+ 11:00:39 s/prezent+/present+/ 11:00:52 present? 11:00:57 Livio has joined #data-shapes 11:01:51 Robert has joined #data-shapes 11:01:55 present+ 11:02:08 DavidHabgood has joined #data-shapes 11:02:13 mgberg has joined #data-shapes 11:02:33 present+ 11:02:49 rrsagent, please draft minutes 11:02:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/27-data-shapes-minutes.html AndyS 11:02:56 YoucTagh has joined #data-shapes 11:03:21 present+ 11:03:50 regrets+ Alex 11:03:57 regrets+ Eliana 11:07:00 present+ 11:07:01 ajnelson-nist has joined #data-shapes 11:07:05 present+ 11:07:20 Topic: Document readiness 11:07:42 Rules has an outline in the doc 11:07:52 Nick: goal to have complete outline of all documents by the end of April, and complete doc by the end of May 11:08:17 ... to be ready for Wide review in June 11:09:23 TallTed4 has joined #data-shapes 11:09:39 scribe: caribou 11:09:49 present+ TallTed 11:09:53 - Compact syntax 11:10:04 good shape for outline 11:10:36 it's feasible to have complete doc by end of May 11:11:06 - UI 11:11:07 labra has joined #data-shapes 11:11:10 Rule work -- document has the necessary section structure. PRs for most of overview (section1); the way assignment and bnode in the head are handled (necessary feature) and for RDF syntax. 11:11:39 content by end of May would be veyr tight 11:11:50 core aspects ok 11:12:03 main scope is form rendering 11:13:45 Nick: unfinished doc may have to be pushed out of Rec track to become a Note 11:14:17 Topic: Registry 11:15:07 Nick: I've sent an email last week about "which things could need a registry" 11:15:16 q+ 11:16:22 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-shacl/2026Apr/0026.html questions 11:16:38 ack ajnelson-nist 11:16:47 Alex: what about SHACL SHACL? 11:17:18 q+ 11:17:40 ack AndyS 11:18:38 AndyS: you can republish documents 11:19:01 Nick: is it easier to add to register rather than republish with addition? 11:19:33 Oggy has joined #data-shapes 11:19:40 AndyS: the WG stays for maintenance mode 11:23:58 Carine described the processes and reasons for WG extensions and rechartering 11:26:23 present+ 11:27:20 edmond has joined #data-shapes 11:27:27 present+ 11:29:01 Topic: Overview document 11:29:10 https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl12-overview/ 11:29:11 present+ 11:29:29 Nick: please have a look at it, it's about what's new in SHACL 1.2 11:29:55 ... q is Are people interested in adding content to this document? 11:30:03 ... intended to become a WG note 11:30:27 ... we used as support for wide review 11:31:18 ... suggestions? 11:32:01 Ognjen: interested in recursion 11:32:08 Nick: in the specifications? 11:32:41 Ognjen: part of the core 11:33:14 Nick: it needs to be worked in the document where it might go first 11:34:07 q? 11:34:15 Nick: I'll keep the Overview doc updated as we progress to the other wide reviews 11:35:06 ... the dataset exchange WG has been rechartered 11:35:19 ... are they going to publish validators for DCAT? 11:36:01 Alex: validator for SHACL 1.2? 11:36:10 Nick: yes 11:36:51 Alex: they might ask us 11:37:32 q+ 11:37:43 Nick: question is how central SHACL is 11:37:51 ack mgberg 11:39:08 Nick: success of @@@ was because it was published with a schema, making validation possible 11:40:03 ... DCAT without a validator does not seem sensible 11:43:45 Nick: (describing the GeoSPARQL experience) 11:44:12 Implementation report (for SHACL 1.0) incoming -- https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/pull/854 11:44:54 Topic: AOB 11:45:57 AndyS: have a live report of implementations 11:46:15 Nick: pySHACL will be updated soon 11:46:27 ... let's discuss next week 11:50:04 Adjourned 11:50:20 RRSAgent, make minutes please 11:50:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/27-data-shapes-minutes.html caribou 13:39:36 Zakim has left #data-shapes