12:57:21 RRSAgent has joined #smart-cities 12:57:26 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-irc 12:57:54 meeting: Web-based Digital Twins for Smart Cities IG 12:58:07 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 12:58:12 chair: Kaz, Koster 12:59:30 agenda: https://github.com/w3c/smart-cities/blob/main/README.md#13-april-2026 13:01:54 present+ 13:02:06 ssimmons has joined #smart-cities 13:02:20 present+ Scot_Simmons 13:02:29 present+ Bert_Bos 13:02:41 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 13:03:31 present- Scot_Simmons 13:03:39 present+ Scott_Simmons 13:03:50 present+ Linda_van_den_Brink 13:04:01 rrsagent, make log public 13:04:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:04:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 13:04:40 scribe+ 13:05:30 Mizushima has joined #smart-cities 13:05:31 topic: Logistics 13:05:38 ktoumura has joined #smart-cities 13:06:10 kaz: agenda and logistics. Guests today: Linda and Scott 13:06:19 brinkwoman has joined #smart-cities 13:06:20 topic: Minutes 13:06:34 -> https://w3c.github.io/smart-cities/minutes/2026/03/02-smart-cities-minutes.html March 2 13:06:53 agenda: https://github.com/w3c/smart-cities/blob/main/README.md 13:07:20 Kaz goes over previous minutes. 13:08:07 kaz: We need to talk about next charter as well. 13:08:30 ... Still waiting for the slides of the last meeting's presentation. 13:09:09 resolution: minutes approved 13:09:10 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 13:09:30 topic: Progress check 13:10:55 Kaz: we want to write a Note, possibly called Technology Landscape around Web-based Digital Twins for Smart Cities 13:11:25 Kaz shows the current template for the note -> https://w3c.github.io/smart-cities/ig-note/ 13:12:25 kaz: we can update based on our discussions, such as today's, and liaisons. 13:12:30 topic: OGC Collaboration 13:12:41 ... today's topic is collabarotaion with OGC 13:13:15 topic: Collaboration with OGC (presentation) 13:13:27 s/topic: OGC Collaboration// 13:13:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:13:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 13:14:00 Linda shows some slides 13:14:25 linda: OGC has several standards, for geospation data formats, etc. 13:14:58 ... With these standards we, e.g., us at Geonovum, can create interoperable digital twins. 13:15:13 ... about soil, rainfall, trafic, etc. 13:15:28 ... We are mostly making simulations. 13:15:43 mjk has joined #smart-cities 13:15:44 ... And testing them in so-called testbeds 13:16:05 i|we can update ba|-> https://github.com/w3c/smart-cities/tree/main/ig-note GitHub area for the Note| 13:16:06 ... Companies get grants to do testing. 13:16:27 ... (I'm skipping many slides with examples.) 13:16:48 ... Here is one use case and I'll explain the standards involved. 13:17:05 [Get backdrop of Almere 13:17:08 ... The use case is about heavy rainfall, that may flood streets. 13:17:14 s/Almere/Almere]/ 13:17:22 ... Start with an aerial photograph. 13:18:06 ... Using OGC APIs we can get data, such as maps. 13:18:13 [Search for cloudburst simulator] 13:18:30 ... Then we search for a model that can do the calculations. 13:19:01 ... OGC API Records is an OGC standard that we use for data sets (DCAT) 13:19:21 [API Processes] 13:19:38 ... Once found, we add interactions, with OGC API Processes 13:20:12 ... The use gets back that a simulator is available and he has to fill in some fields. 13:20:23 ... That informs the process of the needed data. 13:20:35 ... Data comes back in a standards format. 13:20:51 [Async 13:20:55 ... After the calculation, ehich can take some time, the user gets back the results. 13:20:59 s/Async/Async]/ 13:21:26 ... This is an example of the OGC standards that can be involved in a digital twin. 13:21:52 Scott: The context of the digital twin is always understandable and compatible. 13:22:18 ... Inclusing the digitial repesresntaions of sensors. 13:22:37 ... We've been working with several standards bodies for that, including W3C. 13:22:49 q? 13:22:52 ... DCAT was already mentioned as an example. 13:22:55 q+ 13:23:08 kaz: Thanks for that presentation. 13:23:17 ... You mentioned DCAT. 13:23:45 ... How about Webof Things as another model for sensors and devices? 13:24:11 scott: Already some standards in OGC, such as SOSA/SSN joint with W3C. 13:24:35 ... All those sensors, for use, need a time and space. 13:25:03 kaz: WoT in W3C is working on a data model, 13:25:25 ack k 13:25:31 ... but it doesn't have concrete time and location. 13:26:08 linda: When I was in the Spatial Data WG, there were people looking into how the models correspond. 13:26:36 q+ 13:26:39 ... About if they were at different levels and could be comnbined. 13:27:36 kaz: [@@ State chart model as basis for synchronizing streams. 13:28:00 scott: There has been some work in API for connected services. 13:28:11 ... We have to dig a bit to see what is present. 13:28:12 q? 13:28:14 ack m 13:28:37 mjk: I think much is complementary. 13:28:53 ... WoT doesn't define its own API. 13:29:07 s/[@@ State/wondering about logic handling mechanism for orchestration of multiple entities, a possibility is State/ 13:29:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:29:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 13:29:19 ... It is more like a sematically rich @@@ 13:29:29 s/sematically/semantically/ 13:29:49 s/@@@/data model based on JSON-LD/ 13:30:00 ... WoT is a fairly compact JSON-LD vocabulary. 13:30:13 ... It connects to annotations form other standards. 13:30:23 ... It doesn't try to replace other layers. 13:30:31 ... It is for coupling. 13:30:48 ... IN the context of deployment, how do these pieces work together? 13:31:01 ... WoT sort if fills in the cracks. 13:31:29 s/ if / of / 13:31:51 ... We try to create a bigger, overall standard. 13:32:12 ... In this group we look at how everything fitst together 13:32:35 q+ 13:32:36 linda: Sound like interesting work to write that Note that descreibes how everything fits 13:32:46 ... OGC would be part of the description. 13:33:20 kaz: One point might be user credentials and authorization. 13:33:28 ... Are thgere standards for that? 13:33:46 ack mjk 13:33:54 ack k 13:33:55 linda: Notthing specific to geospatial. We use general mechanisms 13:34:19 s/Notthing/Nothing/ 13:34:56 q+ 13:35:26 linda: There is still work on a new version of SOSA/SSN 13:36:38 mjk: Things interactive and asynchronously. In smart buildings, e.g., the sensor can be coupled to a location. In a smart cities, it wil be a different smart model. 13:36:59 s/wil be/will be/ 13:37:00 .... E.g., temperatutre of solar panel array. 13:37:02 q? 13:37:06 ack m 13:37:09 q+ 13:37:11 ... It is kind of ad hoc. 13:37:36 ... We could start in our doc to give guidance. 13:38:00 ... Examples and guidance, some constraints on annotations, on client access to semantics. 13:38:30 ... Let's queue up a presentation on WoT. 13:38:48 ... About Thing Descriptions, new sophisticated interactions. 13:39:05 kaz: We don't have anybody today, be we can do that next time. 13:39:32 ... About buildings: There are probably many trials for smaller ontologies. 13:39:45 ack mjk 13:39:46 ... Do you have ways to refer to such emerging ontologies? 13:40:03 ... Maybe via DCAT or SOSA. 13:40:12 -> https://w3c-lbd-cg.github.io/bot/ Building Topology Ontology 13:40:18 linda: I think the OGC Building Blocks allow referring to ontologies. 13:40:31 scott: As long as the ontologies are registered. 13:40:45 ... OGC standards are highly modularized. 13:41:03 ... This is maturing now, not a lot thatis already done. 13:41:43 kaz: We'd like JTC1, W3C ond OGC to collaborate. 13:42:15 ... Still kind of messy but the mechanisms in JTC should be more clearly defined. 13:42:50 mjk: Having RDF ontologies and namespaces make it easier, especially compare to when we only had APIs 13:43:16 s|Still kind of messy but|JTC4 has been created and the global situation is still kind of messy, but| 13:43:17 linda: Is there already an ontology for properties such as temperature, weight, speed? 13:43:35 mjk: QUTD is I think the best. 13:44:00 ... Avoids problems such as Celsius vs Fahrenheit. 13:44:33 s/QUTD/QUDT/ 13:44:36 ... What's missing is a good defintiion of what is a set point, rolling average, minimum an maximum. 13:44:55 s/minimum an/minimum and/ 13:45:38 ... We are doing a bit of that, also for alarm point, but not yet high and low alarm points. 13:45:43 i|QUDT|-> https://www.qudt.org/pages/QUDToverviewPage.html QUDT Ontologies| 13:45:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:45:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 13:46:06 ... That looks like another opportunity for a group to come together and define it. 13:46:39 ... CDL Control Description Language has some math functions and logics for control flow. 13:47:02 ... It comes with an RDF ontology.. 13:47:15 ... @@ building specs. 13:47:41 ... Real estate core merged with Brics. 13:47:46 -> https://www.realestatecore.io RealEstateCore 13:48:01 ... We can maybe so a survey of what is available in the workld of real estate, 13:48:15 s/@@ building/Building Ontology/ 13:48:26 ... Also automotive and energy, solar energy. 13:48:32 q? 13:48:34 q- 13:48:36 q+ 13:48:57 ... All those are candidates for integration. 13:49:26 ... With AI and agents, you can then build a functional system. 13:49:42 ... Digitial twisn that combine what people are already doing. 13:49:51 s/twisn/twins/ 13:49:58 ... Another exmaple is waste water: what are people doing there? 13:50:23 kaz: Your comment implies that our Note should have a section on ontologies. 13:50:57 mjk: Yes, it is not always obvious. I think we should go to that level of detail in the Note. 13:51:20 kaz: Any more discussion points for toady? 13:52:00 ... We can ask @@ to talks about JTC1. 13:52:26 ... And lets' continue the survey and talk about use cases. 13:52:43 ... I'll find the next date for the May meeting. 13:53:04 Linda: I'll sent you ny slides 13:53:31 s/@@/Torbjorn, etc./ 13:53:46 s/JTC1/their work/ 13:53:51 s/lets'/let's/ 13:53:51 s/I'll sent you ny slides/I'll send you my slides 13:54:15 [adjourned] 13:54:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:54:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 15:42:01 s/collabarotaion/collaboration 15:42:29 s/geospation/geospatial 15:42:51 s/trafic/traffic 15:43:53 s/The use gets/The user gets 15:44:31 s/standards format./standard format. 15:44:57 s/ ehich/ which 15:45:26 s/Inclusing/Including 15:45:45 s/repesresntaions/representations 15:46:10 s/Webof Things/Web of Things 15:46:56 s/comnbined/combined 15:47:43 s/form other/from other 15:48:03 s/IN the/In the 15:48:22 s/fitst/fits 15:48:38 s/Sound like/Sounds like 15:48:47 s/descreibes/describes 15:49:06 s/thgere/there 15:49:45 s/In a smart cities/In smart cities 15:50:41 s/thatis/that is 15:51:07 s/make it easier/makes it easier 15:51:26 s/compare to /compared to 15:52:14 s/CDL Control Description Language/CDL (Control Description Language) 15:52:52 s/so a survey /do a survey 15:53:06 s/workld/world 15:53:28 s/exmaple/example 15:54:01 s/toady/today 15:54:15 s/to talks/to talk 15:54:35 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:54:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html Bert 15:55:16 present- Bert 15:55:16 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:55:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html Bert 15:56:16 s/surveyof/survey of 15:56:40 s/towhen/to when 15:56:51 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:56:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html Bert 15:58:56 present+ Michael_Koster 15:59:01 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:59:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/04/13-smart-cities-minutes.html Bert 18:58:07 Zakim has left #smart-cities