17:56:37 RRSAgent has joined #aria 17:56:42 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/02/12-aria-irc 17:56:42 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:56:43 Meeting: ARIA WG 17:56:46 chair: ValerieYoung 17:56:58 agendabot, find agenda 17:56:58 spectranaut_, OK. This may take a minute... 17:56:59 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/690d057f-db6d-4169-b13f-68d7f1336b59/20260212T130000/ 17:56:59 clear agenda 17:56:59 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created:%3E=2026-02-05+repo:w3c/aria&type=Issues 17:56:59 agenda+ -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y 17:57:02 agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates 17:57:05 agenda+ -> Add transparent generic definition and update accessibility parent and child defs https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2599 17:57:08 agenda+ -> aria-actions: handling focus when actions are synthetically triggered https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2691 17:59:47 Francis_Storr has joined #aria 18:00:37 Siri has joined #aria 18:01:55 pkra has joined #aria 18:02:00 present+ 18:02:14 giacomo-petri0 has joined #aria 18:02:18 giacomo-petri0 has left #aria 18:02:19 present+ 18:02:26 giacomo-petri has joined #aria 18:02:32 present+ 18:03:00 cyns has joined #aria 18:04:22 Adam_Page has joined #aria 18:04:46 present+ 18:04:46 scribe:cyns 18:04:58 dgrogan has joined #aria 18:05:07 scribe: cyns 18:05:11 sarah has joined #aria 18:05:15 present+ 18:05:18 zakim, next itme 18:05:18 I don't understand 'next itme', cyns 18:05:21 zakim, next item 18:05:21 agendum 1 -- -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created:%3E=2026-02-05+repo:w3c/aria&type=Issues -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:05:21 I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me. 18:05:26 present+ 18:05:53 Present+ 18:06:05 present+ 18:07:57 spectranaut_: PR #2726 was reviewed last week. 18:06:05 Scott: this PR doesn't address his original issue. What is the use case here? Is it editable comboboxes 18:08:22 q+ 18:08:36 ...aria-placeholder doesn't actually add a rendered placeholder 18:08:44 ack sarah 18:09:15 Sarah: when this is done with select-only, the placeholder is in the content. Should authors add the placeholder? 18:09:36 zakim, next item 18:09:36 agendum 2 -- -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:09:36 I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me. 18:10:16 no open WPT PRs, James Craig is not here, skip 18:10:25 zakim, close this item 18:10:25 agendum 2 closed 18:10:26 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 18:10:26 3. -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates [from agendabot] 18:10:33 zakim, next item 18:10:33 agendum 3 -- -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:10:33 I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me. 18:10:55 spectranaut_: no deep dives on list, no one asks for one 18:11:02 zakim, close this item 18:11:02 agendum 3 closed 18:11:03 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 18:11:03 4. -> Add transparent generic definition and update accessibility parent and child defs https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2599 [from agendabot] 18:11:07 zakim, next item 18:11:07 agendum 4 -- -> Add transparent generic definition and update accessibility parent and child defs https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2599 -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:12:32 spectranaut_: this is just trying to make the spec more clear, no change to browsers 18:12:48 sarah: change to spec to align with what browsers already do 18:13:21 spectranaut_: what browser input is needed? 18:14:14 @sarah: jcraig and (I think someone from Chrome) didn't want a must for removing things from the a11y tree, and this should only define parent-child relationships. Moving to 7.1 would do that, so need input from browsers 18:14:58 benbeaudry has joined #aria 18:15:02 present+ 18:15:17 q+ 18:15:49 pk: seems like spec and user agent sides are at odds. I find the definition and the whole section confusing. we could acknowledge that UA might leave nodes in, but the spec should be more clear to explain what parent-child relationships should be. Can we do that without forcing UA to do something they don't want to? 18:16:41 q+ 18:16:42 pk: almost seems contradictory, one section says to remove intermediate nodes, but this section assumes they're still there 18:17:06 sarah: may well be confusing! 18:17:18 pk: definition of accessibility object doesn't align with other definitions 18:17:19 ack benbeaudry 18:17:47 benbeaudry: sarah can you remember who from Chromium objected? pls tag me so I can review more deeply 18:18:08 sarah: I remember james craig, I think someone from Chrome too 18:18:17 pk: gecko includes them 18:19:07 sarah: some browsers have the nodes, but they don't interfere with the tree. I remember from testing that browsers all handle it fine, but there can still be interviening generics 18:19:08 q? 18:19:17 pk: want to meet up to hammer this out? 18:19:20 sarah: yes 18:21:00 spectranaut_: I think what peter is saying that it should be clear for developers reading it, because browser behavior is not going to change. It makes sense to me because I worked on child nodes before, but good argument that it's confusing. maybe something like generics shouldn't be included in a11y tree, but browsers can leave them 18:21:21 pk: spec should be talking about aria layer, not OS a11y tree 18:21:58 spectranaut_: developers will see the computed roles in browser dev tools, need to let them know to expect that. Does Ben need to review this? 18:22:38 sarah: I wanted to check my understanding that we don't want a browsers must, would still like that input, but don't need full review 18:23:06 q+ 18:23:14 ack spectranaut_ 18:23:16 ack Daniel 18:23:47 daniel: we should clarify what counts as editorial. Does this modify a user agents must? 18:24:12 sarah: Peter's comment suggested a new browsers must, but it's not currently in the PR 18:24:24 zakim, next item 18:24:24 agendum 5 -- -> aria-actions: handling focus when actions are synthetically triggered https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2691 -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:24:55 spectranaut_: anything to review here? 18:24:59 sarah: no 18:25:11 zakim, close this item 18:25:11 agendum 5 closed 18:25:12 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 18:25:24 Matt_King has joined #aria 18:25:45 spectranaut_: let's look at aria normative PR tracking board. Anything to call out? 18:25:52 present+ 18:25:55 board: https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/204 18:26:00 q? 18:26:36 keithamus: has interop 26 been announced? 18:26:45 ??: yes, announced today 18:26:47 Topic: Review PRs 18:27:30 keithamus: look at interop proposal 2717 18:28:07 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2717 18:28:29 spectranaut_: this needs reviews by srah, adrian, scott and cookiecrook 18:28:54 keithamus: needs more attention from gecko 18:29:40 keithamus: one browser copied another, assumed that's correct, need input from accessibility experts from everywhere 18:29:55 scott: this matches what I assumed after talking to Aaron and Mason from Chrome 18:30:25 s/needs more attention from gecko/needs more attention from WebKit 18:31:46 mattking: are there test cases or sample code that can be contributed to APG? Demo examples that can be used to test with AT 18:31:53 keithamus: yes, will look for some 18:32:06 https://una.im/popover-hint/ & https://mdn.github.io/dom-examples/popover-api/popover-hint/ have examples. 18:32:13 spectranaut_: does this belong in APG since it's HTML? 18:32:26 https://mdn.github.io/dom-examples/popover-api/ 18:32:34 mattking: yes, we want to include HTML, especially open UI, has been on roadmap 18:33:07 mattking: can someone help explore this, so we can make sure we have tests 18:33:44 keithamus: popover=hint is mostly for tooltips, including rich tooltips 18:34:21 mattking: tooltip development examples is one of the oldest APG issues, no one has come up with a good one. maybe popover=hint will be it? 18:34:54 keithamus: there is also the interest for API, which may or may not ship, covers these interaction patterns 18:35:34 cyns: connect to old APG tooltip issue? 18:35:44 mattking: if we think that's right 18:35:58 keithamus: there are more coming 18:36:12 mattking: maybe this belongs in the tooltip example issue? 18:36:44 spectranaut_: assigning issue to keith to add popover examples 18:37:00 spectranaut_: sarah, still want to be a reviewer? 18:37:03 sarah: yes 18:37:51 q+ 18:38:11 zakim, end meeting 18:38:11 As of this point the attendees have been pkra, Francis_Storr, giacomo-petri, Adam_Page, sarah, dgrogan, Siri, Daniel, benbeaudry, Matt_King 18:38:13 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 18:38:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/02/12-aria-minutes.html Zakim 18:38:21 I am happy to have been of service, cyns; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 18:38:21 Zakim has left #aria