15:52:23 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 15:52:27 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/02/04-maturity-irc 15:52:27 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:52:28 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 15:52:48 meeting: Maturity Model Task Force 15:52:59 chair: David Fazio 15:53:30 Agenda+ Github Issue #348 Oversight missing 15:53:30 Agenda+ #226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics 15:53:30 Agenda+ #303 Governance and Strategy Gap 15:53:38 present+ 15:58:44 Mark_Miller has joined #Maturity 15:59:16 janina has joined #maturity 15:59:28 present+ 16:01:02 JeffAdams-UN has joined #maturity 16:01:12 CharlesL has joined #maturity 16:01:38 present+ 16:02:08 present+ 16:02:17 Sheri_B-H has joined #maturity 16:02:27 present+ 16:02:38 present+ 16:02:46 scribe+ 16:03:00 jkline has joined #maturity 16:03:07 present+ 16:03:08 presnt+ 16:03:09 scribe+ 16:03:17 Neha has joined #maturity 16:03:23 present+ 16:03:43 subtopic: New Business 16:03:47 zakim, next item 16:03:47 agendum 1 -- Github Issue #348 Oversight missing -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:03:57 https://events.humanitix.com/perth-digital-accessibility-conference-2026 16:04:46 Crispy has joined #Maturity 16:05:00 Present+ 16:07:20 Google AI summary 16:07:21 Discussion & Resolution: The issue has been a topic in task force meetings, and it was decided that several related tickets concerning governance and strategy gaps (issues 226, 303, and 348) would be merged, with issue 348 as the surviving ticket. A draft for updated language to address these concerns is being prepared. 16:08:27 Mark_Miller: we agreed to change it in June, we formally did it in October (341, 348) 16:09:15 The agreement in June was to rename it to Governance 16:10:32 Mark_Miller: looks like we agreed to do it, but didn't take the action to update the content 16:11:08 from our LLM: The discussion regarding changing the "Culture" dimension to "Governance" occurred over several stages throughout 2025, evolving from an initial renaming to "Oversight and Culture" before landing on "Governance." 16:11:08 Initial Shift to "Oversight and Culture" (June 2025) 16:11:08 The first major discussion about moving away from "Culture" as a standalone term took place on June 4, 2025. During this meeting, Sheri suggested that "Culture" was being used as a catch-all and proposed the broader term "Oversight". Fazio agreed to review the existing proof points to see if they fit under an "Oversight" heading. By the meeting on 16:11:08 June 11, 2025, the task force officially resolved to change the dimension name to "Oversight and Culture" (tracked as GitHub Issue #263). This change was driven by the need to include proof points for financial allocations and risk assessment processes, which the group felt were better suited for an oversight-focused dimension than a 16:11:10 culture-focused one. 16:11:10 Formal Renaming to "Governance" (October 2025) 16:11:10 The transition to the specific term "Governance" was solidified during the October 8, 2025, meeting. This discussion was prompted by new GitHub issues (#341 and #348) regarding missing governance and policy dimensions. 16:11:11 Key developments during this meeting included: 16:11:11 • Renaming Proposal: Sheri_BH argued that the dimension name should simply be "Governance," noting that "governance inherently requires oversight". 16:11:11 • Consolidation: Janina suggested combining existing issues from Jason and Kevin to address this gap. 16:11:12 • Final Decision: Jeff Kline confirmed the task force's direction in that meeting, stating, "We are going to rename Culture to 'Governance'". 16:11:12 Context from Previous Conversations 16:11:16 As noted in our conversation history, while the task force initially deferred creating a completely new "Governance" dimension until after the 1.0 release, they chose instead to substitute and rename the existing "Culture" dimension to ensure that critical elements like executive approval and financial commitment were captured in the current 16:11:16 publication. By October 15, 2025, the group was focused on ensuring the assessment spreadsheet aligned with these structural changes. 16:12:49 Fazio: need to review and add, update or delete each paragraph 16:13:17 janina: I like governance, this is a formal spec and we want to be more than a note some day 16:13:52 janina: it's how you run your show 16:14:53 Sheri_B-H: Doesn't see deleting anything, but deleting and replacing since this is more culture heavy 16:16:47 Sheri_B-H: We don't want to get rid of culture, but expand to include governance. We could say governance includes oversight and culture. 16:17:24 Sheri_B-H: Doesn't think culture should be driving force, but it should be included. 16:18:22 janina: what is not jumping out clearly is what we are talking about is how you manage the work over all the various aspects of accessibility 16:18:47 janina: Doesn't find components in this a problem. But what we don't have started is that what we're talking about is how you manage your work in accessibility and it's aspects forever. That's what the overisght is about. That doesn't jump our in current wording. 16:19:35 queue+ 16:20:06 Sheri_B-H: Title: Oversight. In introduction say oversight includes governance, strategy, and culture 16:20:53 jkline: not for Sheri's idea 16:21:12 For Sheri’s idea 16:21:20 q? 16:21:22 For Sheri's idea 16:22:22 ack jkline 16:23:22 jkline: we need to add proof points around develop, add, and maintain an overarching policy 16:23:35 Fazio: agreed, we just never got that far 16:24:49 q+ 16:25:35 +1 16:25:36 +1 16:25:37 @fazio: Resolution to rename overisght and culture oversight 16:25:37 https://github.com/fazio -> @fazio 16:25:38 +1 16:25:40 +1 16:25:44 +1 16:25:52 +1 16:25:54 q? 16:25:55 q? 16:26:06 ack charlesL 16:26:08 ack ch 16:26:11 ack CharlesL 16:26:12 queue+ 16:26:45 CharlesL: Did we want to use "Oversight and Governance"? 16:27:35 CharlesL: Governance has meeting, but some people may not get "Oversight" and what we're talking about. 16:27:45 Organizational oversight defines how disability inclusion is directed and sustained through governance, strategy, and culture. 16:27:45 Governance sets accountability by establishing policies, standards, and decision making structures that require ICT accessibility across the organization. Strategy integrates accessibility into planning, resourcing, and priorities so it is treated as a core business requirement. Culture reinforces these expectations by ensuring people at every 16:27:45 level understand their role in achieving accessibility goals and recognize the impact of accessible technology on access to employment, services, and participation for people with disabilities. 16:27:48 Sheri_B-H: That's where the intro will help 16:27:58 (proposed intro) 16:28:39 q? 16:28:47 ack jkline 16:29:14 jkline: Maybe "Policy and Oversight" or "Policy and Governance" 16:29:39 Sheri_B-H: Policy doesn't relate to culture. 16:29:45 q+ 16:29:54 ack mark 16:30:21 q+ 16:30:40 Mark_Miller: could we account for the culture piece somewhere else, like communications 16:31:02 Fazio: the order of dimensions is alphabetical 16:31:50 jkline: we need the word culture, but maybe we need to look at it at a different way 16:32:38 Fazio: the people who raised the issues wanted proof points around setting metrics and goals 16:33:03 Mark_Miller: is using "culture" muddying the waters? 16:33:09 kirkwood has joined #maturity 16:33:14 Fazio: You need to have a culture of oversight 16:33:48 janina: you need accountability and funding 16:34:09 janina: that's why we should leave it here, tying it to the c-suite 16:35:05 Governance and oversight define how disability inclusion is directed, monitored, and sustained across the organization. 16:35:05 Governance establishes clear accountability through policies, standards, and decision making structures that require ICT accessibility. Oversight ensures accessibility is integrated into planning, resourcing, and risk management, and that progress is reviewed and acted on. Together, they shape organizational culture by clarifying expectations so 16:35:05 people at every level understand their role in meeting accessibility goals and recognize the impact of accessible technology on access to employment, services, and participation for people with disabilities. 16:37:12 Governance and oversight define how accessibility is directed, monitored, sustained, and measured across the organization. These actions define the organization's commitment to accessibility. 16:38:40 Governance and oversight define the organization's commitment to accessibility. This includes directing, monitoring, sustaining, and measuring accessibility across the organization. 16:40:48 new second paragraph proposal: Governance operationalizes the organization’s commitment to accessibility by setting clear accountability through policies, standards, and decision making structures that require ICT accessibility. Oversight ensures accessibility is directed, monitored, sustained, and measured by integrating it into planning, 16:40:48 resourcing, and risk management, with regular review of progress and outcomes. Together, governance and oversight shape organizational culture by setting consistent expectations so people at every level understand their responsibilities and the impact of accessible technology on employment, services, and participation for people with disabilities. 16:42:07 q? 16:42:33 ack JeffAdams-UN 16:44:33 Governance establishes clear accountability through policies, standards, and decision-making structures that intersect with ICT accessibility. Oversight ensures accessibility is integrated into planning, resourcing, and risk management, and that progress is reviewed and acted on. Together, they shape organizational culture by setting consistent 16:44:33 expectations. This ensures people at every level understand their role in meeting accessibility goals and recognize the impact of accessible technology on employment, services, and participation for people with disabilities. 16:46:14 queue+ 16:47:24 Governance and oversight define the organization's commitment to accessibility. This includes directing, monitoring, sustaining, and measuring accessibility across the organization. \ 16:47:24 Governance establishes clear accountability through policies, standards, and decision-making structures that intersect with ICT accessibility. Oversight ensures accessibility is integrated into planning, resourcing, and risk management, and that progress is reviewed and acted on. Together, they shape organizational culture by setting consistent 16:47:24 expectations. This ensures people at every level understand their role in meeting accessibility goals and recognize the impact of accessible technology on employment, services, and participation for people with disabilities. 16:47:30 ack jkline 16:49:12 q? 16:50:31 q+ 16:51:23 ack CharlesL 16:54:04 Governance establishes clear accountability through policies, standards, and decision-making structures that enable the organization's ICT accessibility initiatives?. 16:54:05 Fazio: Leaving comment in GitHub with the text that Sheri pasted in 16:54:35 Tracked in https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/348 16:54:35 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/348 -> Issue 348 Oversight missing (by iadawn) 16:55:32 zakim, end metting 16:55:32 I don't understand 'end metting', JeffAdams-UN 16:55:39 zakim, end meeting 16:55:39 As of this point the attendees have been Fazio, janina, JeffAdams-UN, CharlesL, Sheri_B-H, jkline, Neha, Crispy 16:55:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:55:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/02/04-maturity-minutes.html Zakim 16:55:49 I am happy to have been of service, JeffAdams-UN; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:55:49 Zakim has left #maturity 16:57:42 Crispy has left #maturity 18:32:21 kirkwood has joined #maturity 19:24:06 janina has left #maturity 20:53:09 CharlesL1 has joined #maturity 21:34:38 CharlesL has joined #maturity 21:58:14 kirkwood has joined #maturity