17:54:01 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 17:54:05 logging to https://www.w3.org/2026/01/28-aria-editors-irc 17:54:05 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:54:06 Meeting: ARIA Editors 17:54:19 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/59835b03-9479-4675-baa7-9bf54ead6804/20260128T100000/ 17:54:20 clear agenda 17:54:20 agenda+ Manual publication of SVG-AAM Working Draft -> https://github.com/w3c/svg-aam/issues/41 https://github.com/w3c/svg-aam/issues/41 17:54:20 agenda+ follow up to "Using ARIA" status" -> https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2708 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2708 17:54:21 agenda+ Should we merge issue trackers? (no tracking issue yet) 18:01:33 pkra has joined #aria-editors 18:01:59 present+ 18:02:07 scribe+ 18:02:09 agenda? 18:06:27 zakim, next item 18:06:27 agendum 1 -- Manual publication of SVG-AAM Working Draft -> https://github.com/w3c/svg-aam/issues/41 https://github.com/w3c/svg-aam/issues/41 -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:07:22 Daniel: just an update. New editors working on new draft. It turned out it wasn't yet integrated into ARIA WG so we'd have to publish manually. 18:07:44 ... I think we have a blanket approval from the WG to publish AAMs. 18:07:50 ... but I wanted to check with the editors. 18:08:02 cyns: sounds very good. 18:08:13 Daniel: great. I'll do it in the next days/weeks/eras. 18:08:32 cyns: should we add a note on the state of things? 18:08:44 Daniel: makes sense. Maybe post to the issue? I'll integrate it. 18:10:23 zakim, next item 18:10:23 agendum 2 -- follow up to "Using ARIA" status" -> https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2708 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2708 -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:10:43 scribe+ Daniel 18:10:43 Daniel: Currently discussing with Steve. Options we have are: 18:10:43 ... - WG agrees on taking this up again, but we'd have to wait until the next Charter period, because Using ARIA is currently not included 18:10:43 ... - Discontinue the Using ARIA working Draft and improve the ARIA Rules in APG, which is mainly what Steve wants to keep for historical purposes. 18:10:44 ... -> https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/DISC-content-editable-20250422/Example of a discontinued draft 18:10:44 scribe- 18:10:47 pkra: I wanted to check on this. 18:11:35 Daniel: discussed this some more. we could pick it up in our next charter, i.e. 2027 18:11:58 ... would stay in working draft. Alternatively it could be marked as discontinued. 18:12:43 Rahim_: what's the history here? 18:13:05 Daniel: started way back when, before html semantics was as settled as it is today. 18:13:27 ... Steve agreed that other resources deal with it nowadays. 18:13:36 mattking: and APG didn't really exist. 18:14:16 pkra: idea from scott was to invite Steve to a meeting 18:14:23 Daniel: of course. 18:15:07 mattking: should the options be recorded in the issue? 18:15:42 Daniel: makes sense. 18:16:56 mattking: I think that would be good. 18:17:01 https://www.htmhell.dev/adventcalendar/2025/10/ 18:17:34 pkra: I would second Scott's point that we should meet up with Steve to hear what his plans might be. 18:17:53 daniel: here's link to an article from Steve on the history. 18:18:39 zakim, next item 18:18:39 agendum 3 -- Should we merge issue trackers? (no tracking issue yet) -- taken up [from agendabot] 18:19:41 pkra: I was wondering if we wanted to reconsider this again 18:20:34 mattking: wasn't there a technical reason, e.g. issue history? 18:21:34 scribe+ Daniel 18:21:34 Daniel: Depending on what we decide, we may need to change the approach at https://github.com/speced/respec/pull/5100. This assumes we are keeping the child repos and we're using them in respec boilerplate, and only changing pulls and commits URLs. But if we're to track all issues on the monorepo, then we need to probably tweak respec further to allow us to define custom "open issues. 18:21:35 scribe- 18:22:22 pkra: right. I thought we could revisit. We had duplication again recently. I find the disconnect between PR and issue difficult. 18:22:29 mattking: find it useful to not follow everything. 18:22:45 mattgarish: reversely, allows just following e.g. dpub-aria 18:23:51 Daniel: I'm leaving a comment from the monorepo in the minutes 18:24:04 pkra: great. then it sounds like we want to keep things as is. 18:25:29 topic: dpub proposal 18:25:34 daniel: any updates on the explainer? 18:25:37 mattgarish: not yet. 18:26:05 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11921 18:26:11 ... fyi this might be relevant soon https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11921 18:26:20 topic: CSS AAM update 18:26:31 Rahim_: curious if there was an update already? 18:26:38 Daniel: not much yet. 18:27:47 ... some technical bits to be resolved (like biblio.js) 18:28:36 pkra: I thought we didn't need this anymore. 18:28:46 Daniel: right. apparently the editors thinks they do. 18:31:06 zakim, end meeting 18:31:06 As of this point the attendees have been pkra 18:31:07 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 18:31:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2026/01/28-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim 18:31:16 I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 18:31:16 Zakim has left #aria-editors