17:01:27 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 17:01:31 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-irc 17:01:31 present+ 17:01:31 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 17:01:41 present+ 17:01:46 present+ 17:01:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 17:01:50 present+ 17:01:50 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 17:01:56 lisp has joined #rdf-star 17:02:50 present+ 17:02:54 rrsagent, make logs public 17:03:06 present+ 17:03:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:03:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html AndyS 17:03:22 meeting: RDF & SPARQL WG meeting 17:03:24 chair: ora 17:03:53 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/11e4d020-9c58-4fff-83c5-37c9e2502295/20251211T120000/#agenda 17:03:53 clear agenda 17:03:53 agenda+ Approval of last week’s minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2025/12/04-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:03:53 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 17:03:53 agenda+ Updates from the SPARQL TF 17:03:54 agenda+ Identifying issues to solve before CR -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/8 17:03:57 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 17:04:00 present+ ora, pchampin 17:04:13 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/12/04-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:04:21 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/12/18-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:04:31 present+ TallTed 17:04:32 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:04:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:04:47 scribe+ pfps 17:04:58 present+ 17:05:07 zakim, open agendum 1 17:05:07 agendum 1 -- Approval of last week’s minutes: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2025/12/04-rdf-star-minutes.html -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:05:16 ora: last week's minutes 17:05:22 present+ olaf 17:05:36 look OK to me 17:05:44 PROPOSAL: Approve minutes from two weeks ago 17:05:46 present+ j22 17:05:46 +1 17:05:48 +1 17:05:50 +1 17:05:51 +1 17:05:52 +1 17:05:53 +1 17:06:08 present+ tl 17:06:08 +0 (wasn't there) 17:06:08 +1 17:06:08 +1 17:06:24 +1 17:06:24 rrsagent, please draft minutes 17:06:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html AndyS 17:06:32 +1 17:06:36 RESOLVED: Approve minutes from two weeks ago 17:06:44 zakim, next agendum 17:06:44 agendum 2 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 2 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:07:25 present+ felix 17:07:34 ora: what's happening with #184 17:07:34 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/184 -> Action 184 import language from rdf-canon into rdf-concepts about the complexity of graph processing (on pchampin) due 2025-12-11 17:08:07 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/259 17:08:08 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/259 -> Pull Request 259 mention graph isomorphism in security considerations (by pchampin) 17:08:18 pchampin: I opened a PR for it, but it isn't linked 17:08:21 AZ has joined #rdf-star 17:08:27 present+ 17:08:31 rrsagent, please draft minutes 17:08:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html AndyS 17:09:56 ora: the PR should appease the security people 17:10:03 q? 17:10:49 pchampin: there are some comment, but convergence is in sight 17:11:19 andy: there are some editorial issues wrt #185 17:11:19 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/185 -> Action 185 PR to just remove the note referencing 1.2 test cases. (on afs) due 2025-12-11 17:11:35 s/andy:/AndyS:/ 17:11:59 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-new/pull/18 17:12:00 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-new/pull/18 -> Pull Request 18 what properties can or should link to triple terms? (by rdfguy) 17:12:12 ora: any concerns on this PR? 17:12:29 ora: if not, I'll merge it tomorrow 17:12:39 AndyS: there are some editorial issues 17:12:45 ora: I'll fix them 17:13:27 pchampin: can I close my action on graph isomorphism? 17:13:38 ora: there is a PR so the action can be closed 17:13:54 Zakim, open agendum 3 17:13:54 agendum 3 -- Updates from the SPARQL TF -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:14:34 AndyS: the meeting has been moved slightly later so that people can listen to a discussion on benchmarking 17:15:04 AndyS: the agenda is to bring things that need to be done 17:15:16 ora: anything to report 17:15:28 AndyS: olaf is working on EXISTS 17:16:00 thats EXISTStential :-) 17:16:44 ora: we'll make a report on SPARQL part of the WG meetings 17:16:53 Zakim, open agendum 4 17:16:53 agendum 4 -- Identifying issues to solve before CR -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/8 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:17:24 ora: horizontal reviews are ongoing 17:17:47 q+ 17:17:53 ora: editorial notes in Concepts mostly gone 17:18:02 ora: what about test cases? 17:18:08 AndyS: working on this 17:18:32 pchampin: RDF interop is being published as a draft note next Tuesday 17:18:49 AndyS: then that note can be resolved 17:19:08 ora: what working needs to be modified 17:19:24 pchampin: there is no more "unstar" so that needs to be changed 17:19:37 pchampin: a pointer to the draft note can be added now 17:20:48 q+ 17:20:50 ora: line item 6 is your work, Andy? 17:21:10 AndyS: yes, but there still needs to be an implementation document 17:21:32 ora: line item 1? 17:21:58 pchampin: there are still some pending comments 17:22:33 pchampin: the suggestion is to just define the parameter w/o an IRI 17:22:56 AndyS: i think it is a bad idea to put an IRI in the MIME type document 17:23:24 ack pchampin 17:24:09 pchampin: I agree, but the IRI belongs somewhere in the spec 17:24:26 ora: If the IRI is not in the MIME type registration what happens 17:24:47 AndyS: then the MIME registration just says that there can be any value 17:25:10 ora: that appears to be in line with the overall spirit of things 17:25:27 pchampin: I'll remove the IRI and make the PR generic 17:25:44 pchampin: The rest is not urgent 17:26:02 ora: who does the INA registration? 17:26:20 pchampin: That would be me, on behalf of W3C 17:26:35 ora: we just make sure that it happens 17:26:42 pchampin: I'll add an action 17:26:45 s/INA/IANA/ 17:27:00 q+ 17:27:01 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-xml/issues/76 -> Issue 76 Update media type registration (by afs) 17:27:07 ack lisp 17:27:11 Zackim, next agendum 17:27:32 q+ 17:27:38 ack AndyS 17:27:43 lisp: If we have time can we discuss if there needs to be any change for the MIME type registrations 17:28:08 AndyS: the MIME type registration has to say that these parameters exist 17:28:40 AndyS: so that they can provide helpful information 17:28:53 ora: what happens if the IRI is unrecognized 17:29:05 +1, profiles can be ignored if you don't understand them 17:29:26 AndyS: you can ignore them, they can't change meaning 17:29:26 q+ 17:29:35 ack lisp 17:30:14 lisp: you are saying that this is change to the registration? 17:30:29 AndyS: profiles are a general feature 17:30:53 AndyS: version is slightly different - its a closed enumeration controlled by the WG 17:31:19 RFC 6906 17:31:25 ora: for this spec (XXX 1.2) 17:31:48 AndyS: later WGs can change the spec and add new permissable versions 17:32:17 enrico_ has joined #rdf-star 17:32:34 AndyS: version should go in the graph store and ... protocols 17:32:42 present+ 17:33:25 AndyS: for protocol we should add something to the protocols 17:33:59 AndyS: if the MIME type registration doesn't mention protocols then having one would be unexpected and is either bad practice or forbidden 17:34:51 AndyS: protocol is open-ended and can be multiple 17:35:00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6838#section-4.3 17:36:47 ora: then our spec states the version tag that we use 17:36:52 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6906 17:37:16 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:37:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:38:40 ora: so we can say that not having profile values is late-binding 17:39:02 AndyS: it's not just us but general usage 17:39:28 i|editorial notes in Concepts mostly gone|subtopic: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/248 17:39:57 ora: james are you satisfied 17:40:19 i|line item 1?|subtopic: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/76 17:40:32 lisp: but the wording includes "values" 17:40:57 lisp: I would not vote against our approach 17:41:21 q+ 17:41:29 ack pchampin 17:41:34 lisp: the registration needs to mention that there are protocols and versions 17:42:08 pchampin: we could say that protocol can take any IRI 17:42:10 q+ 17:42:27 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:42:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/12/11-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 17:42:59 lisp: putting the syntax in the registration means that texts can parsed 17:43:01 ack lisp 17:43:09 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/76 17:43:09 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/76 -> Pull Request 76 Add profile parameter (by pchampin) [ms:CR] 17:43:27 AndyS: you could review the PR, james 17:44:07 s/IRI/URI/ 17:44:49 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 17:44:56 pchampin: they are URIs and may need encoding 17:44:59 present+ 17:45:19 AndyS: HTTP headers are already ASCII so they need encoding 17:45:39 action pchampin to handle the media-type registrations at IETF 17:45:58 ora: should we put something in the spec to remind people about this URI thing 17:46:56 ora: anything else? 17:47:19 present+ fsasaki 17:48:46 olaf has left #rdf-star 17:48:46 pfps has left #rdf-star