IRC log of age-restrictions on 2025-11-12

Timestamps are in UTC.

04:40:29 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #age-restrictions
04:40:33 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/11/12-age-restrictions-irc
04:40:33 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, do not leave
04:40:34 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, this meeting spans midnight
04:40:34 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
04:40:36 [breakout-bot]
Meeting: Age-Based Restrictions Have Come for the Web
04:40:36 [breakout-bot]
Chair: Tara Whalen, Benjamin VanderSloot
04:40:36 [breakout-bot]
Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/tpac2025-breakouts/issues/75
04:40:36 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #age-restrictions
04:40:37 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, clear agenda
04:40:37 [Zakim]
agenda cleared
04:40:37 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Pick a scribe
04:40:38 [Zakim]
agendum 1 added
04:40:38 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Reminders: code of conduct, health policies, recorded session policy
04:40:38 [Zakim]
agendum 2 added
04:40:38 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Goal of this session
04:40:40 [Zakim]
agendum 3 added
04:40:41 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Discussion
04:40:41 [Zakim]
agendum 4 added
04:40:41 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Next steps / where discussion continues
04:40:42 [Zakim]
agendum 5 added
04:40:42 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Adjourn / Use IRC command: Zakim, end meeting
04:40:42 [Zakim]
agendum 6 added
04:40:42 [breakout-bot]
breakout-bot has left #age-restrictions
04:54:22 [denkeni]
denkeni has joined #age-restrictions
05:02:12 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
05:14:57 [breakout-bot]
breakout-bot has joined #age-restrictions
05:14:59 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, do not leave
05:15:00 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, this meeting spans midnight
05:15:01 [breakout-bot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
05:15:02 [breakout-bot]
Meeting: Age-Based Restrictions Have Come for the Web
05:15:02 [breakout-bot]
Chair: Tara Whalen, Benjamin VanderSloot
05:15:02 [breakout-bot]
Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/tpac2025-breakouts/issues/75
05:15:02 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, clear agenda
05:15:02 [Zakim]
agenda cleared
05:15:02 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Pick a scribe
05:15:03 [Zakim]
agendum 1 added
05:15:03 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Reminders: code of conduct, health policies, recorded session policy
05:15:03 [Zakim]
agendum 2 added
05:15:04 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Goal of this session
05:15:05 [Zakim]
agendum 3 added
05:15:05 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Discussion
05:15:05 [Zakim]
agendum 4 added
05:15:06 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Next steps / where discussion continues
05:15:07 [Zakim]
agendum 5 added
05:15:07 [breakout-bot]
Zakim, agenda+ Adjourn / Use IRC command: Zakim, end meeting
05:15:07 [Zakim]
agendum 6 added
05:15:07 [breakout-bot]
breakout-bot has left #age-restrictions
05:31:24 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
05:37:29 [tantek-projector]
tantek-projector has joined #age-restrictions
05:38:20 [phila]
phila has joined #age-restrictions
05:38:49 [mt_hates_irc]
mt_hates_irc has joined #age-restrictions
05:40:04 [smcgruer_[EST]]
smcgruer_[EST] has joined #age-restrictions
05:40:11 [tara]
tara has joined #age-restrictions
05:41:26 [AramZS]
AramZS has joined #age-restrictions
05:42:08 [hadleybeeman]
hadleybeeman has joined #age-restrictions
05:43:27 [tmaruha4]
tmaruha4 has joined #age-restrictions
05:44:33 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
05:44:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
present+
05:44:48 [hadleybeeman]
present+
05:45:50 [AramZS]
present+
05:46:07 [npdoty]
npdoty has joined #age-restrictions
05:47:10 [tara]
The Zoom is acting up a bit, please stand by...
05:47:47 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:09 [npdoty]
I guess I can scribe since I have more Internet access
05:51:14 [snek]
snek has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:36 [yasushi_sony]
yasushi_sony has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:40 [sid]
sid has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:48 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:53 [s]
s has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:53 [Rene]
Rene has joined #age-restrictions
05:51:58 [Rene]
present+
05:51:59 [manu_]
present+
05:52:04 [tara]
present+
05:52:21 [tara]
scribe+
05:52:26 [PZ]
PZ has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:29 [timcappalli]
timcappalli has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:29 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:34 [timcappalli]
present+
05:52:36 [syllaal]
syllaal has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:37 [ErikAnderson]
present+
05:52:38 [pascoe]
pascoe has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:40 [dezell]
dezell has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:46 [alexmt]
alexmt has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:47 [Nishant]
Nishant has joined #Age-restrictions
05:52:48 [dezell]
present+ David-Ezell
05:52:54 [kmoon]
kmoon has joined #age-restrictions
05:52:56 [PZ]
Present+
05:52:58 [alexmt]
present+
05:53:02 [pascoe]
present+
05:53:02 [sarahj]
sarahj has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:03 [zgroza]
zgroza has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:07 [reillyg]
reillyg has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:10 [ErikAnderson6]
ErikAnderson6 has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:20 [reillyg]
present+
05:53:20 [tara]
ben: agenda: workshop summary to start
05:53:21 [rbyers]
rbyers has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:24 [ErikAnderson6]
present+ ErikAnderson
05:53:27 [devlin]
devlin has joined #age-restrictions
05:53:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Topic: Debrief from workshop
05:53:55 [tara]
IAB + W3C jointly ran the workshop: get people from different groups under Chatham House style venue to talk about problem
05:53:59 [rbyers]
present+
05:54:19 [tara]
regulatory folks, child safety orgs, browser vendors etc
05:54:41 [tara]
lot of considerations to think about, many intersecting components
05:54:53 [mt_hates_irc]
insert obligatory avenue Q reference
05:56:12 [tara]
Group provided several ideas of the major impacts, e.g., phishing risk from data collection
05:56:46 [tara]
properties of good solutions, e.g., purpose-limitations of data collected
05:57:04 [tara]
want to be based on open standards
05:57:05 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
05:57:22 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
05:57:48 [tara]
Topic: architectural groundwork
05:57:58 [smcgruer_[EST]]
[We see a diagram of content -> service -> network -> device -> user]
05:58:38 [tara]
Roles in enforcement: verifier; enforcer; policy selector; content rater
05:59:09 [dveditz]
dveditz has joined #age-restrictions
05:59:19 [tara]
Nick: lot of architectural options
05:59:37 [tara]
...roles can be spread across different parties, or grouped together
05:59:49 [tara]
...or cooperative arrangements
06:00:32 [tara]
ex: "signalling" - device to signal to service "I am a certain age, so serve me certain content"
06:00:57 [tara]
...content rating can be done by service (knows the context of the content)
06:01:07 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:01:22 [ve7jtb]
ve7jtb has joined #age-restrictions
06:01:35 [tara]
...existing work: declared age-range API, see CA law which mandates age range be supported
06:01:53 [tara]
labelling switches these roles, e.g., parental controls
06:02:05 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
06:02:22 [phila]
phila has joined #age-restrictions
06:02:29 [phila]
present+
06:02:38 [phila]
q+ to talk about labeling
06:02:43 [dezell]
dezell has joined #age-restrictions
06:02:44 [tara]
service can signal the type of content, can be enforced at device (does not serve it under policy)
06:03:38 [tara]
credential-based age proof: issuer of credential, verifies user's age
06:03:42 [michaelficarra]
michaelficarra has joined #age-restrictions
06:04:00 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:04:04 [manu_]
q+
06:04:06 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Topic: Open discussion
06:04:10 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:04:15 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack phila
06:04:15 [Zakim]
phila, you wanted to talk about labeling
06:04:25 [Ehsan]
Ehsan has joined #age-restrictions
06:04:33 [jugglinmike]
jugglinmike has joined #age-restrictions
06:04:34 [npdoty]
present+
06:04:35 [tara]
@phila: worked on this for a long time (25 yr), "Internet Content Rating Assoc
06:04:46 [AramZS]
q+
06:04:46 [tara]
...labelling does not work (based on my experience)
06:05:11 [michaelficarra0]
michaelficarra0 has joined #age-restrictions
06:05:14 [tara]
...is like P3P. What do you do about unlabelled site/content.
06:05:27 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:05:34 [npdoty]
q+ on brainstorming possible work, not on stopping every proposed area of work
06:05:37 [tara]
verifiable credentials is more promising (limited disclosure)
06:05:43 [jugglinmike]
jugglinmike has joined #age-restrictions
06:05:45 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Nina: How does VC if content provider doesn't want to play?
06:05:50 [michaelficarra2]
michaelficarra2 has joined #age-restrictions
06:05:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Phil: Absolutely doesn't work if they don't want to play. Same problem.
06:05:59 [michaelficarra2]
q+
06:06:14 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... There are many harms beyond adult content, as you said
06:06:41 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We need to do something about it, but bad actors will be bad actors
06:06:45 [alexmt]
alexmt has joined #age-restrictions
06:06:49 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:07:06 [michaelficarra2]
can we have a way to get on the queue without internet connection? I keep getting booted off
06:07:32 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:08:03 [smcgruer_[EST]]
manu_: Wanted to point out some work in the area (sorry we weren't at the workshop)
06:08:12 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... ??? is from the True Age program, non-profit in USA, age verification platform using VCs
06:08:20 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Been in production 2 years, 150k retail locations in USA
06:08:28 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:08:34 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... There are people at W3C with deep experience with age-gating
06:08:38 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
06:08:42 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... It is retail, not online, but it is using VC
06:08:43 [sarahj]
sarahj has joined #age-restrictions
06:08:45 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:08:51 [tara]
Platform: TrueAge
06:08:53 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We should take those learnings into account
06:08:56 [dezell]
dezell has joined #age-restrictions
06:08:58 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:09:00 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack manu_
06:09:07 [jugglinmike]
present+ jugglinmike
06:09:15 [bvandersloot]
present+
06:09:27 [smcgruer_[EST]]
manu_: There are some very large players in this space already
06:09:36 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... ??? sells 55% of alcohol in USA
06:09:40 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... They serve millions of age checks a day
06:09:47 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... They already have published standards for this
06:10:01 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... I hope whatever work is done next, coordinates with True Age, with ???, with the VC working group
06:10:14 [smcgruer_[EST]]
???: +1, would be nice if we could graduate from underage to age appropriate
06:10:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:10:51 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack AramZS
06:11:01 [timcappalli]
q+
06:11:06 [mt_hates_irc]
mt_hates_irc has joined #age-restrictions
06:11:10 [smcgruer_[EST]]
AramZS: +1 to what was said about labeling - anything that requires that an external entity be labelling the age safety or content on the web is unworkable
06:11:15 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... A lot of free speech problems
06:11:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... The way this should work is if I believe my content is 18+, i should be asking if this person is 18+, not waiting for someone else to rate me
06:11:41 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Ben: That means you're rating yourself
06:11:54 [smcgruer_[EST]]
AramZS: Whole range of rating is problematic - movies, comics, etc
06:11:55 [npdoty]
National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) was one of those references from Manu
06:12:03 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... People are put in spaces that are bad, that creates corruption
06:12:12 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... It should be self-attested
06:12:29 [smcgruer_[EST]]
???: Unfortunately the legistlation does not agree with you in many countries
06:12:32 [npdoty]
self-attested would be an example of content rating by the service provider
06:12:35 [smcgruer_[EST]]
s/legistlation/legislation
06:12:35 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:12:45 [smcgruer_[EST]]
AramZS: Want to make sure we're not adding tools to allow others to [missed this]
06:12:55 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:12:55 [mt_hates_irc]
s/???:/aram zucker-scharff:/
06:13:10 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:13:11 [mt_hates_irc]
oops, that's not good, that was Hadley Beeman instead
06:13:14 [dveditz]
actually that reply was hadley
06:13:21 [npdoty]
many businesses already do this, for existing parental controls, whether we like it or not (both self-rating and labeling others, with kinds of heuristics)
06:13:31 [AramZS]
s/[missed this]/rate us
06:13:39 [smcgruer_[EST]]
???: Framing for this workshop, for me, this was a workshop we should have held years ago
06:13:51 [dveditz]
s/aram zucker-scharff/Hadley Beeman/
06:13:54 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... The technical community keeps saying we won't engage, but this is what happens when we don't engage
06:13:57 [hadleybeeman]
s/???/mnot
06:14:01 [dveditz]
(dunno if that works)
06:14:08 [tmaruha4]
tmaruha4 has joined #age-restrictions
06:14:08 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Its not what we're going to introduce here, it's already here, and we're going to be stuck with what is here
06:14:19 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... So we have to hope that the current thing eventually fails, and we build a good thing that can be adopted next
06:14:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
AramZS: I agree we need some sort of age controls, but I think the context in which we present them and how we setup the power dynamics are extremely important
06:14:39 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Ben: +1, yes
06:14:44 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... was discussed at the workshop
06:14:45 [npdoty]
q+ andrewcampling
06:14:46 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:14:52 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack npdoty
06:14:54 [Zakim]
npdoty, you wanted to comment on brainstorming possible work, not on stopping every proposed area of work
06:15:07 [smcgruer_[EST]]
npdoty: Appreciate the passionate viewpoints!
06:15:41 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
06:15:45 [bvandersloot]
q?
06:15:46 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... I expect we need a spectrum of solutions, of which some of us will think they are not a good choice
06:16:04 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Handling an imperfect situation is hard, I don't think we're looking for a single solution
06:16:07 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:16:24 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack michaelficarra
06:16:47 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:16:50 [smcgruer_[EST]]
michaelficarra: A lot of the things we're talking about seem to be focused on is age above a certain range
06:17:01 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... But the opposite problem is actually interesting too, e.g. creating safe spaces for teenagers only
06:17:13 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Difficulties with overage persons entering those spaces
06:17:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Is this in scope?
06:17:25 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:17:31 [npdoty]
it might be a different problem, but it's a certainly a relevant/related problem
06:17:35 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Ben: It was discussed at the workshop, hard problem
06:17:51 [Ehsan]
Ehsan has joined #age-restrictions
06:18:01 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:18:12 [npdoty]
ack timcappalli
06:18:12 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack timcappalli
06:18:12 [tmaruha4]
tmaruha4 has joined #age-restrictions
06:18:20 [tara]
The Advanced Persistent Teenager issue
06:18:23 [rbyers]
present+
06:18:24 [smcgruer_[EST]]
timcappalli: This has potential to impact existing tech, like passkeys
06:18:29 [rbyers]
q+
06:18:32 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... People are using passkeys to do this now, which is really bad
06:18:38 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Since you can share passkeys
06:18:43 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:19:04 [npdoty]
I saw that announced more widely on Monday, before that I thought it was just speculative
06:19:23 [smcgruer_[EST]]
alexis_hancock: What I mostly see around risk of youth or minors is [??] risk
06:19:27 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... There won't be one technical solution
06:19:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Age verification doesn't teach kids to be safe online
06:19:44 [hadleybeeman]
q+
06:19:46 [snek]
s/[??]/contact/
06:19:52 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
06:19:54 [dezell]
q+ to talk about "age over' and the importance of advocacy
06:19:56 [bvandersloot]
q?
06:19:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... So we want to be able to find solutions that have unlinkability, etc
06:19:59 [dveditz]
dveditz has joined #age-restrictions
06:20:07 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... To help decouple from data brokers
06:20:15 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We see data brokers working with age verification systems to gather data
06:20:20 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... I want to see us break away from that
06:20:27 [npdoty]
q+ on abuse reporting (not for content restriction but for other harms)
06:20:31 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:20:40 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We won't find a perfect solution, but we can find a collection of solutions that I think can help
06:20:44 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:20:59 [mt_hates_irc]
age verification only partitions people by age, it does nothing to create safe spaces (or to keep people out of unsafe spaces)
06:21:03 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... A lot of this is around social, and there's no technology that fully solves social
06:21:14 [PaulZiv]
PaulZiv has joined #age-restrictions
06:21:16 [tmaruha4]
tmaruha4 has joined #age-restrictions
06:21:21 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
06:21:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We spent a lot of time debating perfect vs good, whether we should step away or not
06:21:44 [syllaal]
q+
06:21:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We are still trying to fight age verification laws so people can still have anonymity
06:22:00 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... But its likely to be here a long time
06:22:06 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:22:20 [AramZS]
+1 - we should be very limited here in terms of what we provide - a specific signal of age range but not broad context and as little meaning to that signal as possible.
06:22:36 [tara]
...how can we combine solutions
06:22:49 [AramZS]
q+
06:22:51 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack andrewcampling
06:23:23 [smcgruer_[EST]]
andrewcampling: +1 that the focus shouldn't just be age verifying kids to keep them off of adult sites, but also the inverse, as was said
06:23:58 [pascoe]
pascoe has joined #age-restrictions
06:24:02 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... let's not ignore the harms also of NOT age verifying
06:24:09 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... there are harms of doing it, but also the opposite
06:24:16 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:24:58 [ErikAnderson]
ErikAnderson has joined #age-restrictions
06:25:05 [smcgruer_[EST]]
martin: Quick interjection, one thing that keeps coming up is question of outright illegal content
06:25:28 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... There is a limit to how much we can solve illegal content
06:25:49 [smcgruer_[EST]]
andrewcampling: I think there is an overlap, where the pathway to creating the illegal content comes through legal channels to start with
06:25:54 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:25:58 [npdoty]
most of the age verification proposals are not focused on distribution of illegal abuse material -- those aren't suited to cooperative mechanisms of age-verification (because they aren't compliant, clearly)
06:26:14 [smcgruer_[EST]]
???: Major theme at workshop was that these mechanisms are not perfect
06:26:31 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Think the regulations were not written with that in mind
06:26:37 [AramZS]
s/???:/mnot:
06:26:38 [npdoty]
s/???: Major theme/mnot: Major theme/
06:26:55 [tara]
ack rby
06:26:55 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Being able to verify the outcomes to say that age verification does come with a reduction in harm is very valuable
06:27:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
rbyers: We definitely should have done the workshop 3 years ago, but I disagree that its too late now
06:27:51 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... My example is Digital Credentials - we've been challenged, its been hard, its not perfect, but we have to try and we're making progress
06:28:00 [manu_]
manu_ has joined #age-restrictions
06:28:07 [manu_]
q+
06:28:19 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Digital Credentials in Chrome is seeing an uptake in usage already, using ZPK for adult content sites in UK and other age-restricting geographies
06:28:31 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Thats a standard in scope for W3C to influence, for this group to influence
06:28:38 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... If we can move and accept not perfect
06:28:45 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:29:07 [smcgruer_[EST]]
mnot: One thing that comes up is that its not clear if DC is the solution
06:29:19 [PaulZiv]
PaulZiv has joined #age-restrictions
06:29:23 [tara]
ack had
06:29:26 [npdoty]
note that if you suggest improvements, you might also hear that it needs to be too urgently deployed and so we don't have time to make those improvements
06:29:26 [manu_]
q+ to ask if this work is really about age verification, or is it about ensuring protected spaces/communities online?
06:29:36 [smcgruer_[EST]]
hadleybeeman: A lot of us in W3C have talked about how this tech won't work
06:29:40 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... How there's always a way around it
06:29:55 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... At the workshop, we talked about introducing concept of an acceptable failure level
06:29:59 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Bringing that to the regulators
06:30:13 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... And trying to shift the conversation policy side to be probablistic
06:30:21 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... To me, that unlocked a way to do good without being perfect
06:30:29 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:30:36 [tmaruha40]
tmaruha40 has joined #age-restrictions
06:30:39 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack dezell
06:30:39 [Zakim]
dezell, you wanted to talk about "age over' and the importance of advocacy
06:31:02 [PaulZiv]
+1 to Manu. Especially with laws already on the books that do not delineate between adults and children’s.
06:31:04 [smcgruer_[EST]]
dezell: We have a fairly successful age verification program
06:31:08 [bvandersloot]
bvandersloot has joined #age-restrictions
06:31:09 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Largely because we're laser focused on one specific case
06:31:12 [bvandersloot]
q?
06:31:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... In our case, we follow government policy
06:31:46 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... That keeps you from doing things that will infringe on free speech rights, court cases, etc
06:31:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Another thing. Privacy preserving works both ways
06:32:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... In my opinion, a bad actor's privacy is just as sacrosanct as others'
06:32:43 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We keep records and they are verifiable, but don't want to pollute data lakes with how old you are
06:33:02 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Finally, we focus on age-over. Just do that. Don't tell birthdates. Need to know basis.
06:33:17 [sarahj]
sarahj has joined #age-restrictions
06:33:18 [dveditz]
except different jurisdictions and cases need different age boundaries
06:33:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We can make headway in this, but need to choose where the battle happens
06:33:28 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We also need advocacy in the legislative process
06:33:35 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... You need to make a difference there too
06:33:36 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:33:38 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack npdoty
06:33:38 [Zakim]
npdoty, you wanted to comment on abuse reporting (not for content restriction but for other harms)
06:34:08 [sid]
sid has joined #age-restrictions
06:34:11 [smcgruer_[EST]]
npdoty: Workshop was focused on restriction of access to content, where the restriction was age based
06:34:12 [PaulZiv]
PaulZiv has joined #age-restrictions
06:34:21 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... the potential harms to children definitely not scoped to just that (maybe not even aligned)
06:34:25 [tmaruha4]
tmaruha4 has joined #age-restrictions
06:34:29 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... if we are going to look at the broader question of (child) safety online
06:34:35 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... might suggest other work that needs done
06:34:50 [mt_hates_irc]
q+
06:34:50 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... reporting abusive websites, mechanisms for identifying bad situations
06:35:12 [bvandersloot]
close the queue
06:35:12 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... not an area where we've done a lot of standards work at w3c, but I think it is an important area
06:35:20 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Zakim, close the queue
06:35:20 [Zakim]
ok, smcgruer_[EST], the speaker queue is closed
06:35:42 [tara]
ack syllaal
06:35:54 [bvandersloot]
ty, smcgruer!
06:35:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
syllaal: It is not too late to make an impact (from perspective of someone working in Germany)
06:36:04 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... EU is focused on wallet for age assurance (18+)
06:36:08 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... But everything else is left open
06:36:18 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Either technology agnostic, or very vague on what technology
06:36:31 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... And vague on being 'more or less sure'
06:36:32 [jugglinmike]
jugglinmike has joined #age-restrictions
06:36:42 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... A lot of smaller companies really struggle to comply due to lack of guidance
06:36:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... So definitely not too late
06:37:11 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Also, whatever system is developed is agnostic to the use case.
06:37:27 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... can always be used for use-cases other than the legally required
06:37:35 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... that is a dilemma we have to face
06:37:44 [smcgruer_[EST]]
q?
06:37:54 [npdoty]
laser-focus on use case and agnostic to use case is a tough contradiction of advice
06:38:01 [tara]
ack Ara
06:38:11 [npdoty]
but I do think use case limitation would be relevant and significant
06:38:12 [smcgruer_[EST]]
AramZS: We should aim for as minimal as possible a signal, store as little as possible (preferably nothing)
06:38:24 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... We will also have to figure out signals around users aging out of restricted area
06:38:25 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... No clear path at the moment
06:38:30 [sarahj]
sarahj has joined #age-restrictions
06:38:31 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack manu_
06:38:40 [tara]
ack manu
06:38:40 [Zakim]
manu_, you wanted to ask if this work is really about age verification, or is it about ensuring protected spaces/communities online?
06:38:45 [smcgruer_[EST]]
manu_: Is this really about age? Seems to be more about safe spaces for communities?
06:38:46 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Age is a subset use-case
06:38:53 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... I'm concerned we're going to over-optimize on age
06:39:01 [AramZS]
It is about age because that's the specific thing that is required of us by law
06:39:29 [npdoty]
I think that's a good example, actually. communities self-police their boundaries, and we should enable that.
06:39:33 [yasushi]
yasushi has joined #age-restrictions
06:39:39 [AramZS]
q?
06:40:01 [smcgruer_[EST]]
????: There is a big difference between things you self-assert for, versus things you are not legally allowed to declare (such as what age I am)
06:40:08 [smcgruer_[EST]]
ack mt_hates_irc
06:40:22 [smcgruer_[EST]]
mt_hates_irc: Different people have different conceptions of what the requirements are in the space
06:40:37 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... That includes things like privacy, and there are difficult conversations there in this space
06:40:46 [tara]
s/????/hadleybeeman
06:40:53 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... Things like record keeping questions is a difficult question
06:40:53 [dveditz]
what authority attests to your membership of the LGBT+ community? Kind of an offensive question, but if people can self-declare then the mechanism will fail to meet the age-gating legal requirements
06:40:59 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... So focusing on the requirements is important
06:41:02 [tara]
q?
06:41:14 [smcgruer_[EST]]
Ben: Want to thank everyone for coming, the chairs of the workshop
06:41:30 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... I think there are a few clear steps to take, we didn't quite get there but great conversation anyway
06:41:48 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... DC is one area, meta tag in WhatNot ? group tomorrow
06:41:54 [smcgruer_[EST]]
... If anyone wants to talk about all this, fine me
06:41:56 [smcgruer_[EST]]
s/fine/find
06:42:02 [AramZS]
I didn't want to further raise this topic with the limited time but I very much worry we will fall into creating a digital Comstock stamp and I'm not sure we've got a clear line avoiding that
06:42:28 [tara]
Zakim, make minutes
06:42:28 [Zakim]
I don't understand 'make minutes', tara
06:42:35 [tara]
RRSAGENT, make minutes
06:42:36 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/11/12-age-restrictions-minutes.html tara
06:42:43 [npdoty]
bvandersloot, do you have any links to share, re meta tag proposals, or whatwg meetings?
06:43:49 [tara]
RSSAgent, end this meeting
06:44:10 [tara]
RRSAGENT, set logs public
06:44:35 [tara]
RRSAgent, bye
06:44:35 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items