15:55:41 RRSAgent has joined #pointerevents 15:55:46 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/11/05-pointerevents-irc 15:55:47 Meeting: PEWG 15:55:51 Chair: Patrick H. Lauke 15:55:55 Scribe: Patrick H. Lauke 15:56:01 ScribeNick: Patrick_H_Lauke 15:56:03 present+ 15:56:49 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/66591f6b-6694-4f90-b23d-bf8f1b9dda8a/20251105T110000/ 16:01:13 flackr has joined #pointerevents 16:03:00 present+ smaug 16:03:15 present+ flackr 16:03:43 gastonr has joined #pointerevents 16:03:46 present+ gastonr 16:04:06 TOPIC: Update on recharter and new PE3 snapshot 16:04:41 present+ 16:04:41 Patrick: from last time, i removed the unidirectional touch-action from PE3 https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/pull/558 16:05:32 Patrick: based on that philippe requested a new dated snapshot https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/750#issuecomment-3481042409 16:06:23 Patrick: from our last meeting, I updated our charter https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/715 16:07:45 Patrick: adding mention of gestures, and clarifying that we're not going to try to define the black box magic of how UA decides what is / isn't a gesture 16:08:01 Patrick: but we just want to have an API for content to then consume gestures once recognised 16:08:45 Patrick: based on that, Philippe requested the rechartering https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/515 and asked for a current charter extension until that goes through 16:09:38 Robert: does charter need to say anything more about mouse? 16:10:22 Patrick: didn't need to do anything more I think, as we have https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/715/files#diff-23fac1ecea013b66aaa6c4f2b03eb8ea1ea26c305759015375605e5bd29ec8f1R159 16:15:16 TOPIC: Web Platform Tests https://wpt.live/pointerevents/ / https://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents?label=experimental&label=master&aligned 16:15:48 Patrick: I believe you did something on this since last time, Mustaq 16:16:15 Mustaq: yes, I've looked at tweaking how failures are surfaced (?) 16:16:31 https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/559 16:16:59 Mustaq: that first list isn't completely precise, but goes in the right direction 16:17:22 Rob: wonder if we can filter by tests that relate to PE level *3* to weed out some things from 4 16:18:13 Mustaq: don't think tests are tagged in a granular-enough way / make a distinction between versions of PE 16:18:41 Rob: don't need to be super granular, but removing things that are explicitly in 4 would be good to exclude those 16:19:19 Mustaq: good idea to label. wonder if we can reuse existing labels like "optional" or "tentative" 16:20:04 Patrick: "tentative" sounds appropriate to me as an outsider... 16:20:51 Rob: "tentative" is usually reserved for things where there's not even a draft, so not quite the right one 16:21:09 Patrick: is it a problem creating a new label, do we HAVE to reuse an existing label? 16:21:18 Mustaq: no, not a problem 16:21:43 Rob: want to make sure we also remove things that aren't REALLY pointer events issues per se, but more pointerlock or similar 16:22:08 Mustaq: CSS specs go through stages ... wonder how they handle it 16:22:20 Rob: they'd have same problem, as tests aren't split by levels 16:22:39 Rob: having meta tags, or lists of tags... 16:23:05 Gaston: tests can be labelled for interop ... maybe the mechanism that's used for THAT can be used for our purpose 16:23:53 Mustaq: need to be careful with renaming filenames, as it will break lots of external references 16:24:04 Mustaq: so any method we choose should not touch them 16:25:23 Patrick: should we do an action for this? or we can also discuss this in person next week at TPAC... 16:25:35 Rob: there will be other spec people there too, so that might be good 16:26:23 ACTION: discuss labelling/thinslicing/filtering for different levels of PE for the WPT tests at TPAC 16:26:46 TOPIC: Any particular old or new issues that we want to start thinking about/tackling? https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues 16:27:25 Mustaq: not issue related, but about a WPT that fails in all browsers 16:27:46 Mustaq: the test is wrong, but working on it 16:28:16 Mustaq: specific question for Olli - seeing Safari+Chrome fail similarly, but Gecko's behaviour is different 16:28:43 Mustaq: (context is failing test for targets removed from slot ?) 16:30:06 Mustaq: A is host, B inside shadow DOM. you get mouse down/up on B. in Safari/Chrome, the host A sees an actual (fake) event on A, with target A. In Firefox we see it bubbling to A, so target is B 16:30:33 Olli: i think it should behave like Safari/Chrome... 16:31:11 Mustaq: I will send you the test, we can look at it. Question is: are events meant to be "replicated" on host? 16:31:26 Rob: yes we change the target of the event when it goes to the light DOM 16:32:10 Olli: if you have a minimal test case 16:32:20 Olli: even if it's manual 16:32:28 Mustaq: will ping you in IRC 16:34:52 Gaston: is there a specific agenda already set for our meeting at TPAC next week? 16:35:39 Patrick: not crystallised anything yet ... was hoping to play it by ear, more of the same as our regular meetings, just easier to then discuss things while sitting around the same laptop etc. but if anything comes up, I'll send an email/set a proper agenda 16:35:54 Patrick: thank you all, see you physically/virtually next week at TPAC 16:36:00 RRSAgent, set logs world-visible 16:36:05 RRSAgent, generate minutes 16:36:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/11/05-pointerevents-minutes.html Patrick_H_Lauke 16:36:17 RRSAgent, bye 16:36:17 I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2025/11/05-pointerevents-actions.rdf : 16:36:17 ACTION: discuss labelling/thinslicing/filtering for different levels of PE for the WPT tests at TPAC [1] 16:36:17 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2025/11/05-pointerevents-irc#T16-26-23