14:57:25 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 14:57:29 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/10/22-maturity-irc 14:57:29 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:57:30 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 14:57:40 meeting: Maturity Model Task Force 14:57:48 chair: David Fazio 14:57:52 present+ 14:57:56 Agenda+ New Business 14:57:56 Agenda+ CFC Review 14:57:56 Agenda+ GitHub Issue #358 Repetition proof point in 2.5.2.2.1 & 2.5.2.2.4 14:57:56 Agenda+ Github Issue #337 Expand/clarify audiences 14:57:57 Agenda+ Github Issue #340 'Suggested' proof points 15:03:06 Neha has joined #maturity 15:03:16 present+ 15:03:16 present+ 15:03:26 scribe+ 15:04:30 CharlesL has joined #maturity 15:04:38 present+ 15:05:18 zakim, next item 15:05:18 agendum 1 -- New Business -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:05:29 Sheri_B-H has joined #maturity 15:05:35 present+ 15:06:18 CharlesL: Do we have schedule for break out session? 15:06:39 Fazio: Not schedule yet 15:06:39 zakim, next item 15:06:39 agendum 2 -- CFC Review -- taken up [from Fazio] 15:07:30 Mark_Miller has joined #Maturity 15:07:34 Fazio: we can easily address -1 which popped up yesterday but before that we got all +1 15:07:42 present+ 15:09:26 Fazio: Jason has issues with our github and comments but I think it should be internal for us and issues present right now are recommendation 15:10:21 Fazio: As per me we can proceed 15:10:33 janina: All objections will be considered 15:13:33 Fazio: reading Maturity model continues to need a lot of work 15:13:33 #359 15:13:54 Fazio: This does not look substantial issue 15:16:44 http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy 15:17:09 janina: The governing document is this, we have a policy to handle -1 votes 15:17:53 janina: Mattew and I will have to discuss this first and come up with a decision 15:18:42 q+ 15:20:38 janina: we have several implementors who mentioned that it was easy to follow - 15:20:45 ack Fazio 15:22:26 q+ 15:25:21 Sheri_B-H: WCAg four years ago is not same today, so is there a point when we try to align WCAG? 15:25:28 ack CharlesL 15:25:59 Charles: Apart from using it, we also built a product around it 15:27:02 CharlesL: Shared the feedback for using Maturity model 15:28:47 q? 15:28:50 CharlesL: We conducted a survey and shared results 15:28:51 q+ 15:29:46 q? 15:29:47 janina: any of that quotable? 15:29:59 CharlesL: yes 15:30:38 q? 15:30:48 ack Fazio 15:31:27 Fazio: future can be exploring normative side 15:32:20 janina: easy fix for aligning goals 15:32:43 Sheri_B-H: Was she reading the correct version/ 15:32:49 The model provided is to evaluate a disability inclusive organization but the goal stated is "guide for organizations to evaluate and improve their business processes to produce digital products that are accessible to people with disabilities. " For example, the personnel tab would not be needed for the stated goal. There are several results of the 15:32:49 stated goal and model being out of alignment. First, it will miss its target audience. A digital accessibility maturity model's target audience is the digital accessibility staff and allies 15:33:04 janina: We shared one version through CFC 15:33:54 The model provided is to evaluate a disability inclusive organization but the goal stated is "guide for organizations to evaluate and improve their business processes to produce digital products that are accessible to people with disabilities. " For example, the personnel tab would not be needed for the stated goal. There are several results of the 15:33:54 stated goal and model being out of alignment. First, it will miss its target audience. A digital accessibility maturity model's target audience is the digital accessibility staff and allies. A disability inclusive model's target audience is much broader and includes HR, accommodations staff, digital accessibility staff, etc. Because this model is 15:33:54 broader, WCAG 3 cannot adopt it as it is. 15:36:19 janina: I need to talk to Mattew 15:36:48 janina: How to answer a question - Why do we have to publish 15:37:46 Fazio: As it is a iterative process, we should publish and keep working 15:38:33 Sheri_B-H: also people build on top of it 15:40:02 janina: Does deque has their own model? 15:40:23 present+ 15:40:30 Mark_Miller: they do have a roadmap, not sure it is a model 15:41:54 janina: we will acknowledge and we will summrize everything and resond to them 15:42:11 Fazio: We can help you with a reply 15:42:33 janina: Keep it simple and yes minutes will help 15:43:21 Dr_Keith has joined #maturity 15:43:27 present+ 15:43:45 janina: we will use experience of people who have used it 15:45:34 Fazio, janina: CharlesL can send a email by sharing feedback from Benetech side which will help to come up with a reply 15:48:24 janina: sharing a link where maturity model is mentioned 15:48:25 https://a11yedge.github.io/capabilities/ 15:48:43 Fazio: Is it a strong point to put ? 15:48:53 janina: strongest 15:49:19 Fazio: Is there a format? 15:49:27 janina: yes there is 15:49:40 janina: we need and endorsment like Benetech in it 15:50:09 Fazio: I have reference and I will continue with that 15:51:40 zakim, end the meeting 15:51:40 As of this point the attendees have been Fazio, Neha, janina, CharlesL, Sheri_B-H, Mark_Miller, Dr_Keith 15:51:42 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:51:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/10/22-maturity-minutes.html Zakim 15:51:50 I am happy to have been of service, Neha; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 15:51:50 Zakim has left #maturity 16:25:50 CharlesL has left #maturity 17:37:07 kirkwood has joined #maturity 18:08:44 janina has left #maturity 21:37:05 gb has joined #maturity