14:17:31 RRSAgent has joined #coga 14:17:35 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/09/29-coga-irc 14:17:35 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:17:36 Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 14:18:14 regrets+ Becca, Jan 14:19:16 agenda+ scribe (and moving the scribe list - see ) 14:23:08 Agenda+ Citations overview 14:23:26 Agenda+ Citations short notations 14:25:45 item 6 is citations short notation . See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XkQW4iWD_nfUYhKqZWmXy6o1cM_Hy4IpsGgRFqGZP7U/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.cvltb8oa6265 14:27:29 agenda+ moving our actions to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ou0f7XCc5nRLhZD462OP5DA-NHqql2YSC8__lncIuxQ/edit?gid=782561551#gid=782561551 14:27:49 clear agenda 14:28:10 agenda+ scribe (and moving the scribe list - see https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.46j7mwxg89xi ) 14:28:21 Agenda+ Citations overview 14:28:44 Agenda+ citations short notation . See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XkQW4iWD_nfUYhKqZWmXy6o1cM_Hy4IpsGgRFqGZP7U/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.cvltb8oa6265 14:28:53 agenda+ moving our actions to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ou0f7XCc5nRLhZD462OP5DA-NHqql2YSC8__lncIuxQ/edit?gid=782561551#gid=782561551 14:36:48 q? 14:52:09 agenda? 14:55:48 q? 14:55:58 RRSAgent, publish minute 14:55:58 I'm logging. I don't understand 'publish minute', Lisa. Try /msg RRSAgent help 14:56:48 RRSAgent, publish minutes 14:56:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/29-coga-minutes.html Lisa 14:59:38 Eric_hind has joined #coga 15:00:03 present+ 15:01:59 Jennie has joined #coga 15:02:06 present+ 15:02:25 Abi has joined #coga 15:02:49 next item 15:02:54 scribe+ Jennie 15:03:11 LenB has joined #coga 15:03:15 present+ 15:03:22 Charli has joined #coga 15:03:25 present+ 15:03:28 https://docs.google.com/document/d/15HtPkkYx1CIl6bAwP2nsSZKhqTVbqcuMDRz5RmtmvXg/edit?tab=t.8zemqdwbcwtr 15:03:33 Lisa: Scribe list is now in the Word doc: Coga Action Items 15:03:35 next item 15:03:53 close item 1 15:03:56 Lisa: Citations is next topic 15:04:01 next item 15:04:32 present+ 15:05:19 Lisa: (reviewing references section - 7.4) 15:05:37 Charu has joined #coga 15:05:45 ...2 spreadsheets with research from literary reviews 15:06:08 ...multiple sheets viewable at bottom of screen 15:06:27 ...Working to use format similar to W3C 15:06:44 ...W3C has a style manual. 15:06:49 Rain has joined #coga 15:07:10 present+ 15:07:13 ...w3.rog/guide/manual-of-style/#ref-section 15:07:32 ...w3.org/guide/manual-of-style/#ref-section 15:08:04 ...Supported Decision Making - attempt made to follow this 15:08:33 ...Added the paper name 15:08:43 ...This makes it hard to read 15:09:27 ...References being connected was difficult too 15:09:50 present+ 15:09:54 ...For literature reviews like Mental Health Literature Review this is proving challenging 15:10:23 ...github area displaying JSON 15:11:06 ...abbreviations can use a script to move information into the W3C format. 15:12:09 ...If you put in the code following what is in the reference section from the W3C manual of style, it will put this in the correct format for you 15:12:37 Lisa, please enlarge each of the browser pages you go to. I can't see what you're talking about. 15:13:31 ...For the Mental Health Literature Review (Responses) spreadsheet Lisa is adding information to support the citation process to follow the W3C manual of style 15:13:48 ...That's the proposal 15:14:16 ...Inline put the key in 15:14:23 q? 15:15:11 Charli: Reminder: some attendees need the screen enlarged for each screen. 15:15:22 Lisa: Members: please interrupt whenever this is a challenge. 15:17:18 ...Will do a summary of the previous material 15:17:31 ...Trying to put in citations 15:17:39 ...Using the W3C style guide 15:18:06 ...This includes: short name for a specification, with link. 15:18:39 ...They want you to add square brackets with a link to the section for references 15:18:52 ...This proved cumbersome for COGA 15:19:20 ...Example: there could be multiple references for a particular topic. 15:19:42 ...COGA tried using an alternative method but the names were too long 15:20:03 ...This added a lot of coding in addition to making it hard to read. 15:20:37 ...And, this added the need for an anchor in the references section. 15:20:51 ...Then, when citing something, you needed to reference to the anchor in the references section. 15:20:58 ...Not so easy. 15:21:12 ...This must be changed. 15:21:33 ...(displaying the Mental Health Literature Review) 15:21:49 ...This spreadsheet has a new column for the "key" 15:22:16 ...Assigning a unique key to each citation. 15:22:36 ...Then, when doing the citation: put in the square brackets is the key 15:23:22 ...Then, the github has the same information from the spreadsheet (like the author's name) 15:23:32 ...The github includes the key 15:23:43 ...This has JSON 15:23:52 ...Then, a script goes into any file 15:24:28 ...They keys builds the reference in the reference section, properly links 15:24:41 ...Then authors just need to add the key 15:24:47 q+ 15:25:27 Rain: I've done research on text someone is trying to read, which has supporting information inside punctuation like parentheses 15:25:35 ...They can make reading quite difficult. 15:26:03 ...The reader is supposed to read the paragraph text (unlinked). 15:26:29 ...For those with a reading disability the punctuation around the links create difficulty reading. 15:26:37 ...What are the alternatives? 15:26:46 ...Can we shorten it to the short name? 15:27:21 Lisa: Proposal: something like instead of it being inline it would be at the end of the paragraph. 15:27:28 Rain: that would help. 15:27:55 ...Also, it would help to have it styled differently: font, color....is visually different from the other text. 15:28:02 ...This provides clarity that it is different. 15:28:08 Lisa: Like italics? 15:28:20 Rain: Making it smaller and not italicizing it might be better. 15:28:53 q+ 15:28:55 Lisa: They are telling us in the style guide that having the square brackets around the short name, and that takes us to the reference section in the document. 15:29:51 Rain: I think playing with the styling would help so we can ensure it is visually distinct. 15:29:53 q? 15:30:05 ack Rain 15:30:05 Ack Rain 15:30:35 Lisa: (notes in the comments the changes discussed) 15:30:47 ack next 15:30:51 Charli: I understand the desire to emphasize. 15:30:59 ...Moving them to the end is a good way to handle them. 15:31:10 ...Also, color contrast will be important 15:31:23 ...(cites the WCAG standards for this) 15:31:32 ...It still needs to be visible. 15:31:44 Lisa: This would receive an accessibility review. 15:31:57 Charli: I think experimenting is a great idea. 15:32:32 Lisa: (noting in the comments) We need to give it a class name so we can experiment with the font. 15:32:56 ...This way if it gets in an editor's draft, if people have challenges with it, it is a line of code we can change. 15:33:00 ...Do we agree with that? 15:33:02 q+ 15:33:14 ack next 15:33:28 Eric: My only concern: the W3C puts the links at the point of the sentence, which would make this non-standard. 15:33:37 ...Would this be something we need to consider? 15:34:22 Lisa: Do we want it at the end? I think we are doing more citations. 15:34:32 ...Maybe for standards we should do it in the original way. 15:35:20 ...Sometimes the short name is what is discussed in text and how people know it (inline). What about that? 15:35:29 Rain: I think I would need to see how we are intending it to look. 15:35:40 ...The idea: not to make it disruptive. 15:35:44 q+ 15:36:01 Rain: This is more about a style guide. 15:36:06 ack next 15:36:56 +1 to Jennie's recommendation here. It has to do with the flow of the reading. 15:37:06 Jennie: Maybe we want inline citations more similar and citation only to be more distinct visually 15:37:20 Lisa: We could try it with a single paper and see if we are happy with it. 15:37:33 ...Are we also happy using this JSON format? 15:37:49 ...Putting it in JSON, then just referencing it. 15:37:59 +1 15:37:59 Len: +1 15:38:04 Lisa: Any objections? 15:38:04 +1 15:38:19 Lisa: Any other points? 15:38:23 next item 15:38:38 Lisa: Next topic - what is the short name? 15:39:17 ...Laws and references, academic papers, resources. 15:39:33 ...I think we should have different protocols for how we create the keys and short titles for each type. 15:39:55 ...Example: for laws like Section 508, we can use the abbreviation the way it is known. 15:40:11 ...For the COGA 2 Literature Review and update document 15:40:30 ...I created a sheet for standards and laws (bottom tab) 15:40:40 present+ 15:40:45 ...Then we can fill in the information there, and have a different key for each law. 15:41:07 ...Other examples are WCAG 1.1, WCAG 1.2, etc. 15:41:23 ...Are we comfortable using the standard short name? 15:41:35 +1 15:41:45 +1 15:41:47 +1 15:41:49 +1 15:41:54 +1 15:41:59 +1 15:42:00 Lisa: Any objections? 15:42:12 LenB has joined #coga 15:42:15 Lisa: Next - citations for papers. 15:42:16 +1 15:42:42 ...A suggestion: surname (last name) for single author 15:42:56 ...Gets more complicated when more than one with the same name. 15:43:25 q+ 15:43:29 ...1st 3 letters based on name of 1st author 15:43:46 ...This gets difficult when in different databases, but this is a technical issue to solve. 15:43:48 q? 15:44:02 q? 15:44:11 q+ 15:44:23 ack next 15:44:35 Charli: Do other W3C papers use a convention like this? 15:44:37 Lisa: no 15:44:46 Charli: why wouldn't we use the full surname? 15:45:06 Lisa: W3C proposes the title of the document or the known short name. 15:45:23 ...The titles are very long. 15:45:37 ...We want our own convention. 15:46:17 ...We could use the row and database we have it in. 15:46:50 ....RMH (resources, mental health) followed by a number 15:47:11 ...RC (for COGA 2 Literature Review and Update) followed by a number 15:47:24 ...The problem identified - they might get out of order. 15:47:36 ...This may confuse people. 15:47:43 ...Though they would be links. 15:48:14 ...But they may be in a different order than they were cited. 15:48:35 ...q? 15:48:45 q? 15:49:30 Lisa: Also, we have to be sure that the different databases do not conflict or overwrite what is in the other databases 15:49:32 ack next 15:50:07 Len: For the new tab/sheet (Other Resources) we don't have a lot of resources. 15:50:22 ...What I did: used keys which were acronyms as a place holder 15:50:35 ...Row 5: M-AA-1 is the one Lisa added 15:51:26 Lisa: I want to divide this discussion into multiple areas 15:51:48 Len: looking at the last row we have a law, but I don't know what the short name of this law is 15:52:06 ...In Row 8, is called The Colby Act - would this be the key? 15:52:10 ...Or Colby Act? 15:52:22 Lisa: How people in the field refer to it. 15:52:41 ...Most people use the short name. 15:52:48 q+ 15:52:57 ack next 15:53:44 Jennie: if something has a short name and a number for the actual law, can this be searched in the document? 15:53:49 Lisa: Yes. 15:53:58 ([CSS3UI], section 4.1). 15:54:20 ...It will be in the same reference section. 15:55:51 Lisa: Do we prefer using some kind of reference based on the primary author or 1st 3 letters? Or, prefer reference where it is in database? 15:56:09 my perference is where it is in the database 15:56:11 ...My preference is the database 1. 15:56:25 ...Julie's preference: based on the author. 15:56:42 ...But I do not want to vote. 15:57:01 prefer database 15:57:05 My preference is the database. 15:57:09 database 15:57:18 database, but without strong feelings 15:57:30 If we use author's name, then it should be the full name, not first letters only (more readable) 15:57:46 Charu: I don't have a strong feeling either way. 15:58:02 Lisa: Database is what the group prefers. 15:58:20 RMH- 1 , RCL-3, 15:58:40 ...Does anyone have strong opinions about the number of letters? 15:58:44 q+ 15:59:41 Jennie: if we keep the letters for the database, but would the numbers become problematic for some members of the group? 15:59:47 ack Jennie 16:00:05 RM-Smith1 16:00:37 Lisa: you would still need to track that there aren't 2 Smiths in the database 16:00:56 scribe+Lisa 16:01:34 RRSAgent, publish minutes 16:01:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/29-coga-minutes.html Lisa