14:05:49 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 14:05:53 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-irc 14:06:00 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 1 14:06:08 chair: Koster 14:06:14 scribe: dape 14:06:47 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Koster, Ege_Korkan, Cristiano_Aguzzi 14:07:01 present+ Daniel_Peintner, Tomoaki_Mizushima 14:07:26 TOPIC: Minutes review 14:07:37 -> Nov 11 -> https://www.w3.org/2025/09/11-wot-td-minutes.html 14:07:58 s/Nov 11/Sep 11 14:08:28 rrsagent, make log public 14:08:31 MK: Updates/additions? 14:08:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:08:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:08:41 q? 14:08:41 ... none -> minutes are approved 14:08:55 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#September_24-25%2C_2025 14:09:21 TOPIC: Publications 14:09:31 EK: Prepared PR for static documents 14:09:44 ... I will revert some changes 14:10:08 ... adding note that some parts will be changed in future 14:10:16 ... other documents are all fine 14:10:23 cris has joined #wot-td 14:10:24 ... binding templates, binding registry 14:10:33 i|Prepared|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2140 TD PR 2140 - TD 2.0 FPWD Publication| 14:10:39 ... FYI, no validation errors either 14:10:42 ... all good 14:10:47 MK: Sounds good 14:11:50 i|other documents|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/pull/442 Binding PR 442 - New Note Publication| 14:12:16 TOPIC: Inviting WoT CG Participants for Feedback on the Initial Connection: 14:12:30 EK: will invite them for October 2nd 14:12:45 TOPIC: TD SpecWork 14:12:53 SUBTOPIC: Manageable Affordances 14:13:03 i|other docu|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-registry/pull/38 Registry PR 38 - Draft Registry Publication| 14:13:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:13:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:13:30 EK: Cristiano prepared PR, see https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2107 14:13:35 q? 14:13:42 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 14:13:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:13:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:14:46 CA: question why we call document "Manageable Affordances Analysis" 14:15:01 ... I think we should merge this PR and work on updates in future PRs 14:15:37 i|Cristiano prepared|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/blob/main/planning/work-items/analysis/analysis-manageable-affordances.md Manageable Affordances Analysis| 14:15:38 ... document collects previous proposals 14:15:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:15:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:15:50 ... we have user stories 14:16:03 ... for now 3 of them 14:16:11 ... 1. 14:16:23 s/... 1. /... 1. Monitorable and Cancelable Actions 14:16:33 ... 2. Queue of Actions 14:16:50 ... 3. Express dependencies between affordances 14:17:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html dape 14:17:38 CA: Valid flows are of importance 14:18:02 q? 14:18:31 ... document has section "Existing Solutions" 14:18:43 ... some user stories can be captured with what we have 14:18:47 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:18:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:18:54 .. but not in an efficient way 14:19:29 CA: I also looked into existing technologies 14:19:51 ... in the end it is not that common 14:19:59 ... collected list of a view frameworks 14:20:16 s/a view/a few 14:20:46 ... our TD spec can describe some frameworks already 14:21:22 q? 14:21:44 EK: I have one small comment 14:22:04 ... about why call it "Affordances" 14:22:34 s/why call it/why we call it 14:22:50 ... in BACnet one also needs to send events 14:23:39 CA: BTW WebAgents user story about dynamic TDs 14:24:14 EK: Dynamic TDs are an even bigger topic 14:24:28 CA: Touches also discovery 14:25:41 q? 14:26:07 ... we need more features to capture that behavior 14:26:21 ... I tend to say we should leave out dynamic TDs 14:26:33 EK: We should note it somewhere 14:27:32 CA: Ben commented also, see https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2107#issuecomment-3306724545 14:27:52 ... not sure how I should express/list it in the document 14:28:11 EK: Template does not cover all that 14:28:18 CA: Yes 14:28:57 ... abstract vs concrete user story 14:29:10 EK: Specific use-case 14:29:34 q? 14:29:56 MK: Concrete protocol to be adapted 14:30:03 ... we can refer to it 14:30:21 ... I don't think it is yet another use case 14:30:37 CA: yes, it's more about end user 14:30:57 q? 14:31:25 ... Ben provided valuable feedback but I suggest to add it in subsection 14:31:39 EK: like "real life scenarios" 14:31:51 ... term use case is overloaded 14:32:39 CA: "Concurrent action instances" is mentioned by Ben also 14:33:08 ... e.g., printer to print three tickets 14:33:42 EK: We should consider that aspect 14:33:52 CA: yes, that's new 14:35:12 CA: I am not very happy with the current structure 14:35:22 ... summary comes at the very end 14:35:33 EK: Makes sense to move it up 14:36:38 CA: Sections "Existing Solutions" and "Existing technologies analysis with focus on Manageable Actions" somehow overlap 14:36:50 ... any suggestion how to improve? 14:38:18 MK: Web of Things Solution instead of Existing solutions 14:39:19 EK: Move "related real world implementations" under analysis 14:40:05 MK: Dependencies between affordances 14:40:16 ... we can start refining this concept 14:40:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:40:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:41:37 MK: about creating new resources for long running action ? 14:41:43 q+ 14:41:57 CA: It is not that common as I initially thought 14:42:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:42:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:43:01 Kaz: Discussion for this mechanism is very important 14:43:21 ... I am interested in state machine solution 14:43:33 ... extending TD 14:43:42 ... is that too much for TDs? 14:44:16 ... extending specification I mean 14:44:27 EK: I agree 14:45:52 CA: Analysis is in a good state, I think 14:46:00 ... rework structure and merge soon 14:46:25 ... and open new issues and working on requirements/solutions et cetera 14:46:26 q? 14:46:32 ack kaz 14:46:44 EK: Makes sense 14:46:56 ... we should add Ben's example also 14:47:53 CA: Can do subsection about BACnet events/alarms also 14:48:14 MK: General direction looks good 14:48:16 q? 14:49:00 ... status properties might conflict with state machines but we are in a good shape 14:49:49 MK: AOB? 14:50:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:50:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:50:41 [adjourned] 14:50:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:50:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/24-wot-td-minutes.html kaz