15:59:57 RRSAgent has joined #json-ld 16:00:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/09/10-json-ld-irc 16:00:02 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:00:03 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), bigbluehat 16:00:10 meeting: JSON-LD WG 16:00:10 chair: bigbluehat 16:00:10 present+ 16:01:02 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/04e937c0-e751-4c7e-9ba4-5782e0b3d272/20250910T120000/ 16:01:02 clear agenda 16:01:02 agenda+ Announcements and Introductions 16:01:02 agenda+ Recharger Next Steps 16:01:02 agenda+ Open Discussion 16:02:41 present+ 16:03:45 present+ 16:03:51 present+ 16:04:44 present+ 16:05:12 s/Recharger/Recharter/ 16:05:16 scribe+ 16:05:40 Zakim, next item 16:05:40 agendum 1 -- Announcements and Introductions -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:06:53 q+ 16:07:00 ack ivan 16:07:03 bigbluehat: Gregg Kellogg passed away this weekend. 16:07:47 https://www.w3.org/TR/epub-33/#ack 16:09:05 ivan: The least we can do is to put a similar paragraph honoring Gregg. 16:09:36 bigbluehat: The number of things Gregg contributed to is probably beyond the reach of AI... 16:10:36 ivan: It's practical to put it in JSON-LD 1.2 but we may get an acknowledgement to put it in JSON-LD 1.1 16:10:42 +100 16:11:14 bigbluehat: I'd like to get something public now if possible. 16:11:39 ivan: Me and pchampin can probably get OK for that 16:11:50 q+ 16:11:51 bigbluehat: I can draft probably a PR 16:11:57 ack TallTed 16:12:11 TallTed: I would be in favour of putting it in both 1.0 and 1.1 16:12:26 All in agreement. 16:12:51 s/1.0 and 1.1/1.1 and 1.2 16:14:36 Zakim, next item 16:14:36 agendum 2 -- Recharger Next Steps -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:14:52 Victor Lu: JSON-LD is very important in a lot of things so I very much appreciate honoring Gregg for this. 16:15:19 bigbluehat: We all voted in agreement over email. 16:15:57 latest version: https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-charter-2025/ 16:16:00 ivan: One thing still to do - for bigbluehat to approve the latest version 16:16:37 bigbluehat I approve 16:17:22 pchampin: As next step I will request horizontal review 16:17:36 https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/494 16:17:38 https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/494 -> Issue 494 [wg/json-ld] JSON-LD Working Group Charter (by plehegar) [Advance Notice Sent] [charter] 16:18:10 s/bigbluehat I approve/bigbluehat: I approve 16:18:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/10-json-ld-minutes.html TallTed 16:18:50 pchampin: Now the horizontal review gets the requests for this. It may take some weeks, and then we can go to AC review. 16:19:15 q+ to ask practicality question about minutes generation for this WG/CG 16:19:23 ... should it take too much time, we might still be able to go forward 16:20:04 ivan: I presume there will be comments from the horizontal review and/or AC. We till handle them as issues (in the w3c repo). 16:20:21 ... please keep an eye on these as they come in. 16:20:49 bigbluehat: Thank you for getting that ready. We'll watch it closely. 16:20:53 ack TallTed 16:20:53 TallTed, you wanted to ask practicality question about minutes generation for this WG/CG 16:21:34 TallTed: Gregg has preferred tools for generating logs/minutes. Is anyone acquainted with them (or other shared tools)? 16:21:47 q+ 16:22:04 bigbluehat: I will look at the code in the repo (probably code that Manu wrote, and I worked on). 16:22:07 ack pchampin 16:22:41 pchampin: I did use those tools a few weeks ago. It went pretty smoothly, except for a timeout of a github action. 16:22:48 ... More people looked on that. 16:23:24 ... I'm in favour of keeping them running. The trickiest part is the size of the repo. 16:23:52 bigbluehat: Moving to a static site hit upon that as well. The gh repo is very large. 16:24:21 ... That timeout will probably increase, we may have to address that. 16:25:03 bigbluehat: Do we have people able to pick up from Gregg? 16:25:05 q+ 16:25:14 scribe+ 16:25:16 ack niklasl 16:25:29 niklasl: I'd like to try 16:25:43 ... in my current position is probably more on the JSON-LD Star aspect of this work 16:25:49 q+ 16:25:55 ... and that's a bit tricky with separate repos, etc. 16:26:13 ... but I'm not yet sure we're in dire need of an editor 16:26:22 ... so, we may be fine 16:26:35 ack ivan 16:26:41 ivan: we have to be careful here 16:26:51 ivan: We have to be careful here. 16:26:53 ... the reorganization of the charter means we're talking about v1.2 16:27:00 ... which are all the technical changes on 1.1 16:27:08 ... but not the new things from RDF 1.2 16:27:21 ... we are planning to have a JSON-LD 1.3 to incubate during the WG 16:27:28 ... We're talking about JSON-LD 1.2, with the editorial, errata, and so on. We will have a separate 1.3 which will be optional to start on. 16:27:33 ... and toward the end move to a v1.3 publication toward the end of the group 16:27:38 ... So at this point, 1.2 is not that. 16:28:36 bigbluehat: I don't recall how many things are pending. We may need to analyze that in upcoming calls. 16:28:37 q+ 16:28:45 ack niklasl 16:28:58 niklasl: there is one thing that I am almost ready to make a PR of 16:29:13 ... and it's not Star/RDF-1.2 related 16:29:27 ... it's already approved, but likely still need some changes 16:29:42 ... so my contributions are not 100% RDF-1.2 related 16:30:30 q+ 16:30:34 ack pchampin 16:30:36 bigbluehat: We need to discuss co-chair and editor workloads 16:31:19 pchampin: A possibly crazy idea - we are struggling with the version numbers. Maybe adding nicknames as well (bear with me). 16:31:33 ... What about calling the first one Gregg. 16:32:11 ... Debian had names from Toy Story. What about using Kellogg mascots? 16:32:13 `1.1.5`? `1.1bis`? and make eventual 1.2 sync with RDF 1.2? 16:32:54 pchampin: Mostly internal nicknames.. 16:33:05 We could do worse than informally using Kellogg's mascots 16:33:17 I like it too. 16:35:26 ivan: We may consider something not associated too much with the name. 16:35:45 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integer_sequences 16:40:07 bigbluehat: We can look for good names in that list and choose next meeting. 16:40:36 q+ 16:41:28 ivan: We should be careful about considering joint CG/WG meetings; especially for IPR reasons, 16:41:39 s/reasons,/reasons/ 16:41:42 ack ivan 16:42:30 bigbluehat: I am currently the only chair for both groups. We should discuss how to proceed with the CG as well. 16:42:53 ... The VC group has also done a good job of promoting JSON-LD. 16:43:20 Zakim, next item 16:43:20 agendum 3 -- Open Discussion -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:43:57 bigbluehat: bye all 16:43:58 Zakim, end meeting 16:43:58 As of this point the attendees have been bigbluehat, pchampin, dlehn, niklasl, ivan 16:44:00 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:44:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/09/10-json-ld-minutes.html Zakim 16:44:09 I am happy to have been of service, bigbluehat; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:44:09 Zakim has left #json-ld 16:44:10 rrsagent, bye 16:44:10 I see no action items