15:56:35 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:56:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-irc 15:56:39 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 15:56:39 meeting: RDF-Star WG biweekly meeting 15:56:51 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/40c79d60-8147-4da7-8185-c39434216daf/20250717T120000/ 15:56:51 clear agenda 15:56:51 agenda+ Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2025/07/03-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2025/07/10-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:56:51 agenda+ Proposal for next week's discussion 15:56:51 agenda+ Review of open actions, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 15:56:52 agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 15:56:55 agenda+ Issue Triage, available at -> 5 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/5 15:56:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:56:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk 15:56:58 agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting 15:57:00 RRSAgent, make log public 15:57:07 present+ 15:57:54 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/07/11-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:57:54 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2025/07/18-rdf-star-minutes.html 15:58:08 tl has joined #rdf-star 15:58:29 present+ 15:58:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:59:30 Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star 15:59:39 ora has joined #rdf-star 16:00:12 present+ 16:00:17 present+ 16:00:40 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 16:00:40 present+ 16:00:54 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:00:59 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 16:01:00 present+ 16:01:05 present+ 16:01:11 present+ 16:01:15 present+ 16:01:19 chair+ 16:01:23 present+ 16:01:49 scribe+ 16:01:56 present+ 16:02:01 Zakim, open item 1 16:02:01 agendum 1 -- Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -> 1 https://www.w3.org/2025/07/03-rdf-star-minutes.html , -> 2 https://www.w3.org/2025/07/10-rdf-star-minutes.html -- 16:02:04 ... taken up [from agendabot] 16:02:18 minutes look fine to me 16:02:28 PROPOSAL: Approve minutes from last two meetings 16:02:32 +1 16:02:36 +1 16:02:40 +1 16:02:45 +1 16:02:46 +1 16:02:50 +1 16:03:03 present+ 16:03:03 +1 16:03:03 +0 (I was absent) 16:03:16 +0 (was not present) 16:03:17 fsasaki has joined #rdf-star 16:03:21 +1 16:03:32 +1 16:03:50 RESOLVED: Approve minutes from last two meetings 16:03:56 Zakim, next item 16:03:56 agendum 2 -- Proposal for next week's discussion -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:04:05 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/6 16:04:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:04:48 q? 16:04:49 ora: should we pick a few topics to discuss and then do triage etc.? 16:05:06 present+ fsasaki 16:05:13 q+https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/170 16:05:13 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/170 -> Issue 170 treatment of structures that are not RDF graphs (by pfps) [duplicate] [needs discussion] 16:05:14 s/+0 (was not present)/+0.5 (was not present 3rd July) 16:05:16 ktk: maybe we put the new issues on top? 16:05:17 Souri has joined #rdf-star 16:05:19 james has joined #rdf-star 16:05:26 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/68 16:05:27 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/68 -> Pull Request 68 Add language to require that only valid IRIs ... (by gkellogg) [needs discussion] [spec:substantive] [test:needs tests] 16:05:27 present+ 16:05:29 present+ 16:05:31 ora: good idea 16:05:40 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/126 16:05:41 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/pull/126 -> Pull Request 126 Some improved language, punctuation, and markup in rdf-semantics (by TallTed) [needs discussion] [propose closing] [spec:editorial] 16:05:41 Enrico has joined #rdf-star 16:05:46 present+ 16:06:41 q+ 16:06:53 q+ 16:06:55 william-vw has joined #rdf-star 16:06:57 ack pfps 16:07:03 ack 16:07:16 ktk: can we start with 126, then 78 and 170? 16:07:21 ack next 16:07:29 present+ 16:07:36 ack AndyS 16:07:46 pfps: 170 and 78 can be combined 16:08:11 AndaY: should we put some PR as priority to get towards PR? 16:08:57 present+ 16:08:57 ora: we take the two pfps mentioned and then see where we go, would that be ok? 16:09:08 s/AndaY/AndyS/ 16:10:24 AndyS: sometimes we loose focus and forget about the "small" thinks relevant for CR 16:10:36 q? 16:10:49 s/170 and 78/170 and 68/ 16:10:51 ora: I think we could do then a discussion item "relevant for CR" 16:11:01 rrsagent, please draft the minutes 16:11:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html Dominik_T 16:11:33 s/then 78/then 68 16:11:47 Zakim, next item 16:11:47 agendum 3 -- Review of open actions, available at -> 3 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:11:52 ora: I hope that the CR discussion will be more on the administrative side. As I hear no objections, we simply do it. 16:12:58 q+ 16:12:59 reference: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/159 16:13:00 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/159 -> Action 159 write a non-normative description (in "what's new") about what properties can or should link to triple terms (on rdfguy) due 2025-05-08 16:13:12 ack pfps 16:13:12 ora: 159 is on my, I will finish that today 16:13:34 pfps: 148 has a PR related to it, can we close it? 16:14:08 ora: what is blocking us? 16:14:39 pfps: some things which should be done before accorfding to the discussion, but that should not stop us 16:14:52 ora: then we close, information is still around 16:15:13 ora: where are we with teh RDF Shema todo? 16:15:28 context: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/162 16:15:29 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/162 -> Action 162 make a proposal for a new plan on RDF-schema, per w3c/rdf-schema/45 (on domel) due 2025-06-12 16:15:53 s/teh RDF Shema/the RDF Schema/ 16:15:56 s/Shema/Schema 16:16:20 ora: there seem to be trouble with the audio, we come back to it 16:17:01 ora: niklasl, where are we with 150? 16:17:43 niklasl: we are in the middle of it, I will be traveling, but pa and I will coordinate and solve that 16:18:09 ora: Dominik_T, could we now discuss the RDF Schema plan? 16:18:46 Zakim, next item 16:18:46 agendum 4 -- Review of pull requests, available at -> 4 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4 -- taken up [from agendabot] 16:19:11 q+ 16:19:11 I also lost audio and had to reconnect 16:19:20 ack niklasl 16:19:59 niklasl: I think 214 is ready for merging now 16:20:06 I haven't seen latest edits. please wait a efw hours 16:20:09 ... if editors approve of course 16:20:34 q+ 16:20:35 TallTed: please wait for me 16:20:59 niklasl: sure 16:21:00 ack pchampin 16:21:13 q+ 16:22:13 pchampin: I want to report about 212 and 213, They are alternatives and we only need to approve one 16:22:49 ack gkellogg 16:23:10 ... there were some concerns with version 213 that AndyS raised, but I think apart from that they are both fine 16:23:58 q+ 16:24:21 ack AndyS 16:25:51 gkellogg:I had a note about N-triples (#68), we need to discuss, I would like to get feedback 16:25:52 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/68 -> CLOSED Action 68 check out PRs against GitHub wiki pages (on pfps) due 29 Jun 2023 16:26:07 pfps: that is related to the discussion topic for next week 16:26:29 ora: then we can hopefully add that to the discussion 16:28:01 s|(#68), we|(https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/68), we| 16:29:32 gkellogg: I think we need to discuss this in a meeting because this is blocking 16:29:33 s|https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/68 |https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/68 | 16:29:34 s/CLOSED Action 68 check out PRs against GitHub wiki pages (on pfps) due 29 Jun 2023|Add language to require that only valid IRIs .../ 16:29:46 ora: Then we discuss it next week 16:29:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 16:30:55 ora: is semantics #137 the one you wanted to close, pfps? 16:30:56 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/137 -> CLOSED Action 137 create label spec:new-feature, and add reference to class-X in the relevant label descriptions (on afs, pchampin) due 2024-11-28 16:31:09 Zoom keeps on stopping audio and I have to rejoin 16:32:00 pchampin: I think it is the one, so we can assume that it is the one and pfps will take care of it 16:32:21 s|https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/137 -> CLOSED Action 137 create label spec:new-feature, and add reference to class-X in the relevant label descriptions (on afs, pchampin) due 2024-11-28| 16:33:05 q+ 16:33:12 As far as #137 goes, I made a change in response to a request from Ted and I'm waiting for him to see the change. I'll add him as a reviewer to make this explicit. 16:33:21 ora: are there more things which could be merged? what about the tests? 16:33:28 ack niklasl 16:33:29 AZ has joined #rdf-star 16:34:17 (https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/205 ) 16:34:17 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/205 -> Pull Request 205 Add test for entailment of literal type (by niklasl) 16:34:23 niklasl: we still need to update the manifest for 1.1, that should be another PR 16:35:20 gkellogg: #209 in RDF tests needs review 16:35:20 Issue 209 not found 16:35:38 w3c/rdf-tests#209 16:35:38 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-tests/pull/209 -> Pull Request 209 Adds directional language-tagged string tests … (by gkellogg) [Semantics] 16:35:49 q+ 16:35:55 ack pfps 16:36:21 pfps: what is the status of the test pr tests of #200 16:36:21 Issue 200 not found 16:37:00 gkellogg: there have been some comments I worked on, should be fine now 16:38:06 gkellogg: meta comment on tests, we have manifests from 1.2 we might want to combine with the new ones 16:38:25 manifest.ttl and manifest-az.ttl 16:38:30 niklasl: that is part of pr #rdf-star201 16:38:56 ora: what about 79, the protocol manifest? 16:39:12 s/#rdf-star201/rdf-tests#209/ 16:40:22 gkellogg: that is also about the tool chain building the manifest, maybe we can get some feedback on that 16:40:37 I'll try to take another look at it. 16:41:16 q+ 16:41:25 ack AndyS 16:41:25 .. The PR is also about how to write the manifest and I'd like to get feedback 16:41:43 AndyS: is the vocabulary behind documented somewhere? 16:41:59 gkellogg: yes 16:42:17 AndyS: I think we should include the link then 16:42:21 https://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/ correct? 16:42:33 gekellogg: I will try to add it 16:42:49 ht: http://www.w3.org/2011/http# 16:43:11 s/gekellogg/gkellogg/ 16:43:13 q? 16:43:20 q+ 16:43:30 ora: gregg williams, would you have a look? 16:43:45 gregg williams: sure 16:44:02 s/gregg williams:/gtw:/ 16:44:26 https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/245 -> Pull Request 245 Adds links to algebraic syntax symbols within the translation section (by hartig) 16:44:59 ora: what about sparql #245? 16:45:00 Issue 245 not found 16:45:06 regrets+ olaf 16:45:26 ack pchampin 16:45:30 gtw: olaf sugested to first focus on the "core issues" 16:45:53 q+ 16:46:01 TallTed: I am fine with waiting 16:46:02 ack niklasl 16:47:38 q+ 16:47:40 niklasl: the css things, dark mode etc. - I have some suggestions I tried (to be checked further) 16:48:06 ack gkellogg 16:48:47 gkellogg: I like the direction it is going but I think we should wait with that till after CR 16:48:55 q+ 16:49:03 q+ 16:49:04 ora: then I am fine with waiting 16:49:08 ack AndyS 16:49:35 q+ 16:49:57 AndyS: When we go to CR, will that be a document at the same place where we are editing? then there could be a problem if we still work on it 16:50:32 q+ 16:51:21 pchampin: the common practice is to "freeze" the CR version and further work on the editors version 16:51:45 ack pchampin 16:51:45 ack tl 16:51:54 ack niklasl 16:52:18 niklasl: will the cross document references in the CR work? 16:53:46 tl: question for niklasl, will you be around next week, just for scibing 16:54:19 niklasl: no, I can't scribe 16:54:30 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:54:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/17-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin 16:56:11 ora can you share this linkedin list? 16:56:52 (I already know it's bad since it doesn't include some pivotal technologies!) 16:59:47 pfps has left #rdf-star 17:18:18 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:43:16 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:00:18 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:19:58 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:29:56 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:11:54 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:13:58 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 23:31:05 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 23:47:49 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star