13:36:10 RRSAgent has joined #apa 13:36:14 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/07/09-apa-irc 13:36:14 RRSAgent, make logs Public 13:36:15 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina 13:36:27 Meeting: APA Weekly Teleconference 13:36:37 Date: 09 Jul 2025 13:36:42 Chair: Matatk 13:40:46 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 13:40:46 agenda+ TPAC 2025 13:40:46 agenda+ Horizontal Review process update 13:40:46 agenda+ New on TR 13:40:46 agenda+ [Comment review requests](https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review) 13:40:49 agenda+ [CSS Update (Paul)](https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues) 13:40:52 agenda+ Actions check-in 13:40:54 agenda+ Other business 13:40:57 agenda+ Be done 13:42:02 matatk has joined #apa 13:42:08 agenda? 13:47:13 regrets: Gautier_Chomel, Fredrik_Fischer, Keith_Newton, Gottfried_Zimmerman 13:50:00 regrets+ Chiara_Cerretti 13:53:39 Fazio has joined #apa 13:55:26 PaulG has joined #apa 14:02:15 matatk has joined #apa 14:02:27 present 14:02:27 present+ 14:02:28 present+ 14:02:34 rrsagent, make minutes 14:02:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/09-apa-minutes.html matatk 14:02:54 present+ 14:03:06 present+ 14:03:42 Neha has joined #apa 14:03:49 scribe+ Neha 14:03:50 present+ 14:03:53 rrsagent, make minutes 14:03:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/09-apa-minutes.html matatk 14:04:00 scribe+ 14:04:00 scribe+ 14:04:03 zakim, next item 14:04:03 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 14:05:35 Baseline info: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Baseline/Compatibility 14:07:43 TPAC meeting? 14:08:02 WebDX community group working on the gap between Baseline information accessibility issues. Lola, from this group asked APA group to analyse this gap by scheduling a meeting. We will setup a meeting and will communicate with all. 14:08:37 matatk: we can probably have a break out session 14:09:10 We should have a more significant TPAC meeting about Baseline 14:09:24 s/we can probably have/there will probably be/ 14:09:35 janina: We need AAC representative should vote as a member organization 14:09:40 zakim, next item 14:09:40 agendum 2 -- TPAC 2025 -- taken up [from janina] 14:09:52 s/need AAC/need AC/ 14:10:27 We have quite a few sessions in TPAC 14:10:40 q? 14:11:11 matatk: I will contact Lola for Baseline and a11y during TPAC 14:11:14 zakim, next item 14:11:14 agendum 3 -- Horizontal Review process update -- taken up [from janina] 14:11:23 Reminder of the new documentation on proposing spec review comments: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Horizontal_Review#For_Specifications_2 14:12:38 matatk: This needs to be divided into sections and update wiki page. 14:13:01 matatk: Next time whoever is doing this review follow this process and give us a feedback 14:13:09 q? 14:13:37 zakim, next item 14:13:37 agendum 4 -- New on TR -- taken up [from janina] 14:13:41 subtopic: CSS Positioned Layout Module Level 4 14:13:41 - tracker: https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/155/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=119163005&issue=w3c%7Ca11y-longituidinal-tracking%7C27 14:13:41 - spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-position-4/ 14:14:01 Roy_Ruoxi: New publication 14:14:28 s/publication/FPWD publication/ 14:14:32 Roy_Ruoxi: we have time to review this document and who wants to review this document? 14:15:12 matatk: It is update to standard positioning in CSS 14:15:40 matatk: Paul, is there any change in this document? Are yopu aware of this by any chance? 14:15:56 here is review history for level 3: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/CSS_Positioned_Layout_Module_Level_3 14:17:26 PaulG: If there is a scrollable area and there no element inside it which does not get focus then scroll bar will get focus, and this is a part of chrome update. But not sure if this is the part of new update or not. 14:18:34 PaulG: There were also hicups in implementing pop overs but if this is the part of new update or not, not sure 14:19:10 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:19:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/09-apa-minutes.html Roy_Ruoxi 14:20:13 matatk: anyone have anything to add to this scroll bar focus thing, although focus word does not appear in the this document 14:21:20 q? 14:22:15 matatk: if someone wants to review web neural network then please follow above mentioned process in the link 14:22:35 agenda? 14:22:39 matatk: we dont have naything new on spec review 14:22:52 zakim, next item 14:22:52 agendum 5 -- [Comment review requests](https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review) -- taken up [from janina] 14:23:19 subtopic: [css-fonts-5] Feature for making text always fit the width of its parent 14:23:19 source: w3c/csswg-drafts#2528 14:23:19 tracking: https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/240 14:24:15 PaulG: I did not add any comment but couple of people have already mentioned that it is terrible 14:24:36 PaulG: zoom example is explained how bad it is 14:25:33 matatk: may be we should open separate issue to tackle a11y side of this? 14:26:33 Patrick pointed out Resize Text here with a demo: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2528#issuecomment-2770261671 14:26:48 janina: To us it appears it voilate WCAG SC 14:28:26 violate* 14:29:34 PaulG: we can say +1 to Patrick and add some comments 14:30:04 Fazio: Do we have to mention it strongly? or just mention? 14:31:31 matatk: We are not sure we should comment at this stage or not 14:32:00 matatk: There is not request fom there side to review it, PaulG noticed this 14:33:27 matatk: We should comment from APA side in polite words, janina and I can work on wording 14:33:43 janina: Is this a normative document? 14:33:48 matatk: Yes 14:34:49 matatk: I like the point of David about barriers 14:35:19 PaulG: Shall we say this does not respond to Zoom 14:35:41 Comment on zoom: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2528#issuecomment-2769976414 14:36:49 PaulG: zoom in and zoom out functionality and make sure it does not violate WCAG SC 14:37:55 Fazio: If we do not use proper wording like must, it creates a lot of concerns 14:41:29 instead of accessible experience say to meet accessibility requirements 14:43:12 agenda? 14:44:50 subtopic: Connect HTML spec up to new CSS `interactivity` property 14:44:50 source: whatwg/html#10956 14:44:50 tracking: https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/231 14:46:20 See Sarah Higley's comment: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10956#issuecomment-2780650841 14:47:16 This was the latest on how it's being shipped in Chrome: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1037#issuecomment-2831227912 14:47:41 matatk: This is on tag design review 14:48:29 matatk: Is this aligned with WG pull request? 14:49:26 PaulG: I dont see a PR 14:51:13 PaulG: I think there is some work on CSS interactivity 14:51:47 regrets+ Jennifer_Strickland 14:52:53 matatk: They are trying to hormanize HTML and CSS approach 14:54:04 PaulG: I can dig into it and try to understand more 14:54:20 matatk: Jen can also help on this 14:57:59 matatk has joined #apa 14:58:04 zakim, end meeting 14:58:04 As of this point the attendees have been matatk, PaulG, Fazio, janina, Neha 14:58:06 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:58:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/09-apa-minutes.html Zakim 14:58:13 I am happy to have been of service, matatk; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 14:58:13 Zakim has left #apa 15:00:00 janina has left #apa 15:57:45 PaulG has left #apa 16:05:41 spectranaut_ has joined #apa 16:33:23 jamesn has joined #apa