12:34:46 RRSAgent has joined #apa 12:34:51 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-apa-irc 12:34:51 RRSAgent, make logs Public 12:34:52 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina 12:35:01 Meeting: APA Weekly Teleconference 12:35:07 Date: 02 Jul 2025 12:35:11 Chair: Janina 12:35:15 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 12:35:15 agenda+ APA re-charter 12:35:15 agenda+ Horizontal Review process update 12:35:15 agenda+ New on TR 12:35:15 agenda+ Charter review requests 12:35:18 agenda+ [Spec review requests](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues) 12:35:20 agenda+ [Comment review requests](https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review) 12:35:23 agenda+ [CSS Update (Paul)](https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues) 12:35:26 agenda+ Other business 12:35:28 agenda+ Be done 13:02:22 /join #rqtf 13:58:11 agenda? 13:58:17 present+ 13:59:51 regrets: Fredrik_Fischer, Gautier_Chomel, Alisa_Smith, Gottfried_Zimmerman 14:01:38 PaulG has joined #apa 14:02:02 present+ 14:03:06 Dr_Keith has joined #apa 14:03:32 matatk has joined #apa 14:03:37 present+ 14:04:26 scribe+ 14:04:40 agenda? 14:04:50 present+ 14:04:57 zakim, take up next item 14:04:57 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 14:05:12 mike_beganyi has joined #apa 14:06:00 janina: TPAC planning continues, there's more work to do, but the agenda should be ready in 2 weeks 14:06:02 present+ 14:06:14 zakim, take up next item 14:06:14 agendum 2 -- APA re-charter -- taken up [from janina] 14:06:54 janina: re-chartering is in process. We're looking for votes from members. We're currently at 11 and we need another dozen or so. 14:07:24 ... many orgs have not yet voted so please have your reps cast their votes 14:07:51 Neha has joined #apa 14:07:54 ghttps://www.w3.org/wbs/33280/apawg-recharter-202Results: https://www.w3.org/wbs/33280/apawg-recharter-2025/results/ 14:08:00 Voting on APA charter: https://www.w3.org/wbs/33280/apawg-recharter-2025/ 14:08:26 ...we have until the end of July to get this done 14:08:28 zakim, take up next item 14:08:28 agendum 3 -- Horizontal Review process update -- taken up [from janina] 14:09:31 matatk: recap: we are improving the horizontal review process. We're close to the first major change which is the HTML version of the self-review checklist. 14:09:50 present+ 14:09:59 Process for raising issues as part of spec review: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Horizontal_Review#For_Specifications_2 14:10:25 ...the improvements for folks doing reviews from APA includes raising issues 14:10:54 ...I want to add a couple of things to these instructions. You can follow this process and raise comments as part of an a11y review. 14:11:10 ...We'd like people to use this process when you do your next review. 14:11:25 ...We can adjust the process based on feedback. 14:11:45 ...There's an issue template that we're happy with. 14:12:44 ...There's a couple of reviews outstanding so we can use this process for those as well (e.g., web neural network, etc.) 14:12:59 ...any questions? 14:13:03 (crickets0 14:13:32 matak: If there's anything you want to see more of in the documentation, let us know. 14:13:51 s/matak/matatk/ 14:13:56 rrsagent, make minutes 14:13:58 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-apa-minutes.html matatk 14:14:05 janina: We think it will make our lives easier 14:14:05 zakim, take up next item 14:14:05 agendum 4 -- New on TR -- taken up [from janina] 14:14:37 subtopic: Digital Credentials 14:14:47 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/155/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=118175398&issue=w3c%7Ca11y-longituidinal-tracking%7C26 14:14:58 https://www.w3.org/TR/digital-credentials/ 14:15:37 Roy_Ruoxi: there is an accessibility considerations section but it has no content. This is a first public working draft 14:15:49 ...someone could start looking into this one 14:15:59 q+ 14:16:19 ack me 14:16:20 ack ma 14:16:26 janina: In the past we've had Lionel look at this but anyone can look into it. 14:16:55 matatk: it's very specific, it relates to digital versions of physical credentials such as government ids. 14:18:00 q? 14:18:17 ...it's related to verifiable credentials. But not completely because of the analog to physical documents. 14:18:51 janina: we're early in the process so we want to get on this while we have plenty of time. I'd like to assign Lionel and myself. 14:19:35 matatk: some additional background, various government groups are discussing this issue in a conference: trust, verifiability, security, etc. 14:19:39 q? 14:19:51 ...W3C is involved because there's a big push right now. 14:20:24 ...it's something for RQTF but we should also consider various mailing lists to get many eyes on it. 14:20:43 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:20:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-apa-minutes.html Roy_Ruoxi 14:20:51 q? 14:21:03 Neha: I'd be happy to contribute to this. 14:21:52 janina: it will be at least 2 weeks before we come back to this 14:21:56 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/155/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=118175398&issue=w3c%7Ca11y-longituidinal-tracking%7C26 14:22:11 zakim, take up next item 14:22:11 agendum 5 -- Charter review requests -- taken up [from janina] 14:22:17 subtopic: Web Applications Working Group Charter 14:22:31 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/155/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=118111252&issue=w3c%7Ca11y-request%7C115 14:22:41 https://w3c.github.io/webappswg/charter/draft-charter-2025.html 14:23:19 janina: it's a busy group, we've worked with them often. Is there anything new in the charter? 14:23:31 Roy_Ruoxi: they didn't mention any liaison with us 14:23:47 janina: we haven't had a problem working with them when we need to, so not sure it's needed. 14:24:13 Roy_Ruoxi: there are some new concepts in their charter 14:24:13 q? 14:24:49 matatk: devices and sensors has a collaboration spec for device orientation and motion 14:25:17 janina: I'm inclined to say we can sign off on this, I have no concerns 14:25:20 matatk: agreed 14:25:35 zakim, take up next item 14:25:35 agendum 6 -- [Spec review requests](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues) -- taken up [from janina] 14:26:02 regrets+ Jennifer 14:26:31 matatk: we don't have Jen on the call and we have a lot of CSS to get to. The Web Neural Networks API, where we published our comment last week, we also discussed some other issues. 14:27:17 ...Paul raised a good point that we can raise issues with other groups like audio description and ensure the ideas get into other areas like VTT (unsure of minuting). 14:27:37 ...I'd like to have someone follow our new process to make these comments. 14:28:01 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:28:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-apa-minutes.html Roy_Ruoxi 14:28:37 I can try to make a comment about audio description. 14:28:50 matatk: I'm happy to help and we can look at it again next week 14:29:52 zakim, take up next item 14:29:52 agendum 7 -- [Comment review requests](https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review) -- taken up [from janina] 14:30:28 subtopic: Canvas Text Metrics for Editing, Art and Design 14:30:29 source: w3ctag/design-reviews#1095 14:30:29 tracking: https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/233 14:32:15 matatk: this is about putting text on the canvas in artistic ways 14:32:44 ...this could involve fallback content as well as live regions if it was dynamic in nature 14:33:18 scribe+ 14:33:53 PaulG: My main concern is that itself is like 3 raccoons in a trenchcoat; it doesn't really have a good fallback. COGA reasons (e.g. dyslexia); reading order could be a mess; ... 14:35:24 mike_beganyi: to echo Paul, changing direction and flow and making that available to AT is an issue. I mentioned skew, kerning, but not dyslexia specifically. 14:36:03 matatk: Jeffery Askin suggested that references to the elements could have fallbacks. 14:36:17 q? 14:37:43 PaulG: Non-text content needs a text description if you want to meet the spirit of WCAG. Having artistic text floating around in a canvas was not anticipated by WCAG. 14:37:57 janina: Canvas came along in HTML as a method to provide bits on screen. 14:38:41 PaulG: What I'm guessing is that even though AG may be aware of it, they may think it's not an evolving area. 14:38:57 janina: Concern around an area of the page having its own ecosystem. 14:39:14 PaulG: Whole thing needs role=image and a text description at a minimum. 14:39:33 janina: The idea of mapping the API to elements sounds interesting to me. I like the subversive implications of putting it into an API. 14:39:56 matatk: this is an active TAG review and will probably be asked for my thoughts on it. 14:40:11 HTML in Canvas: https://github.com/WICG/html-in-canvas 14:40:45 ...there's something called HTML in canvas which is new APIs for rendering 2d and webGL. It would be in the DOM but it would be rendered in the canvas. 14:41:22 ...they mention accessibility improvements and they mention the fallback and better support for it. 14:41:43 janina: That sounds like a good approach 14:42:24 PaulG: +1 14:42:57 +1 14:43:17 subtopic: [css-overflow-5] Discrete versus navigation scroll marker mode 14:43:17 source: w3c/csswg-drafts#12122 14:43:17 tracking: https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/236 14:45:43 matatk: Concern about overreach, CSS imparting roles and behavior. 14:45:55 PaulG: Concern that this conflicts with named anchors. 14:47:07 janina: What he said" 14:47:13 s/What he said"/What he said!/ 14:47:16 +12 14:47:58 subtopic: Add hover/focus/long-press triggering delays to CSS 14:47:58 source: w3c/csswg-drafts#9236 14:47:58 tracking: https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/205 14:48:37 PaulG: This is something that most devs are already trained to do. 14:48:45 ... Have two concepts: throttle and debounce. 14:49:17 ... Those two mechanisms for adding a slight delay - either for perceived improved performance, or preventing someone from moving their pointer across the screen and being bombarded by pop-ups - could be useful. 14:49:33 ... Seems compatible with WCAG - don't hide stuff whilst someone's using it, for example. 14:50:13 ... the appearance of it can be delayed slightly, that's fine, and it can animate out - doesn't affect the WCAG angle. 14:50:42 ... Doesn't use JavaScript, so that's good, though custom tooltips not really needed. But it's OK. 14:52:11 Fazio has joined #apa 14:52:27 subtopic: Triage 14:52:42 PaulG: Pointer Animations - if it respects reduced motion should be OK 14:53:38 PaulG: interactivity needs discussion - see Patrick Lauke's point that it will affect discoverability - e.g. if you look for other slides, and they're not in the accTree, you won't find them. 14:54:27 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711 14:54:46 Paul's comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-3020935396 14:55:14 Patrick's comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2770346540 14:55:51 Scott O'Hara's comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2310950905 14:56:05 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2528 14:56:18 This was the other issue Patrick wanted interest on 14:57:07 zakim, end meeting 14:57:07 As of this point the attendees have been janina, PaulG, matatk, Dr_Keith, mike_beganyi, Neha 14:57:08 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:57:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/07/02-apa-minutes.html Zakim 14:57:15 I am happy to have been of service, matatk; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 14:57:16 Zakim has left #apa 15:00:52 Neha has left #apa 15:02:38 janina has left #apa