16:55:10 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:55:14 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/06/19-aria-irc 16:55:14 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:55:15 Meeting: ARIA WG 16:55:23 agendabot, find agenda 16:55:23 jamesn, OK. This may take a minute... 16:55:23 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/5a155237-d896-464b-9c5f-6dd1654293ae/20250619T130000/ 16:55:23 clear agenda 16:55:23 agenda+ Should we meet on July 3, 2025 16:55:24 agenda+ -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y 16:55:26 agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates 16:55:29 agenda+ FYI Future TPACs: Kobe, Japan - Nov 10-14, 2025, Dublin, Ireland - 26-30 Oct, 2026 16:55:32 agenda+ -> New board(s) https://github.com/w3c/aria/projects?query=is%3Aopen 16:55:34 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?l=&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2025-06-12+repo%3Aw3c%2Faria&type=Issues 16:55:38 agenda+ Find reviewers for stuck things 16:56:06 filippo-zorzi has joined #aria 16:57:29 spectranaut_ has joined #aria 16:58:23 zakim, leave 16:58:23 Zakim has left #aria 16:58:30 Zakim has joined #aria 16:58:36 zakim, start meeting 16:58:36 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:58:38 Meeting: ARIA WG 16:58:44 chair: ValerieYoung 16:58:48 agendabot, find agenda 16:58:48 spectranaut_, OK. This may take a minute... 16:58:48 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/5a155237-d896-464b-9c5f-6dd1654293ae/20250619T130000/ 16:58:48 clear agenda 16:58:48 agenda+ Should we meet on July 3, 2025 16:58:49 agenda+ -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y 16:58:51 agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates 16:58:54 agenda+ FYI Future TPACs: Kobe, Japan - Nov 10-14, 2025, Dublin, Ireland - 26-30 Oct, 2026 16:58:57 agenda+ -> New board(s) https://github.com/w3c/aria/projects?query=is%3Aopen 16:58:59 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?l=&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2025-06-12+repo%3Aw3c%2Faria&type=Issues 16:59:03 agenda+ Find reviewers for stuck things 16:59:32 Adam_Page has joined #aria 17:00:47 ChrisCuellar has joined #aria 17:01:07 present+ 17:04:05 pkra has joined #aria 17:04:07 scribe: Adam_Page 17:04:14 present+ 17:04:17 present+ 17:04:27 zakim, next item 17:04:27 agendum 1 -- Should we meet on July 3, 2025 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:04:31 giacomo-petri has joined #aria 17:04:40 present+ 17:04:40 present+ 17:04:49 spectranaut_: should we meet? 17:04:57 ... Daniel is running the meeting next week 17:04:58 front-endian-jane has joined #aria 17:05:04 ... and the week after that is the day before a U.S. holiday 17:05:15 ... but many people might be taking that day off 17:05:46 ... do people want a meeting? 17:05:58 ... no one else is out, so we’ll keep it 17:06:18 zakim, next item 17:06:18 agendum 2 -- -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:06:38 spectranaut_: skipping new issue triage, we’ll do next week 17:06:46 ... but nothing new for open WPT PRs, so we’ll skip 17:07:05 pkra: there was an issue filed coming out of Jamie Teh’s question about case insensitivity 17:07:14 ... Rahim filed an issue 17:07:18 ... our issue is 2548 17:07:42 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2548 17:07:47 https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop-accessibility/issues/192 17:08:00 ... Jamie found a crash in Firefox 17:08:07 ... and he asked whether they’re supposed to be insensitive 17:08:20 ... Rahim said we should have tests for that 17:08:28 spectranaut_: we’ll talk about this issue next week in triage 17:08:45 zakim, next item 17:08:45 agendum 3 -- -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:09:00 spectranaut_: there is a deep dive planned for July 17 17:09:11 ... computed roles for tables run by keithamus 17:09:17 ... anything else? no 17:09:17 zakim, next item 17:09:17 agendum 3 was just opened, Adam_Page 17:09:23 zakim, close this item 17:09:23 agendum 3 closed 17:09:24 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:09:24 4. FYI Future TPACs: Kobe, Japan - Nov 10-14, 2025, Dublin, Ireland - 26-30 Oct, 2026 [from agendabot] 17:09:27 zakim, next item 17:09:27 agendum 4 -- FYI Future TPACs: Kobe, Japan - Nov 10-14, 2025, Dublin, Ireland - 26-30 Oct, 2026 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:09:50 jamesn: 2026 has been announced 17:09:56 ... notably not in the U.S. 17:11:07 zakim, next item 17:11:07 agendum 5 -- -> New board(s) https://github.com/w3c/aria/projects?query=is%3Aopen -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:11:48 spectranaut_: we made 2 kanban boards by popular demand 17:11:50 cyns has joined #aria 17:11:53 ... ARIA Normative PR Tracking 17:12:00 ... and ARIA Editorial PR Tracking 17:12:22 ... the PRs in each following two different processes 17:12:24 fromt-endian-jane has joined #aria 17:12:31 s/following/follow/ 17:13:08 spectranaut_: the columns are Draft → Needs Review → Needs update from review → Reviewed, need PR checklist items 17:13:17 ... there are currently 5 PRs in Needs Review 17:13:29 pkra: one observation 17:13:36 present+ 17:13:49 ... you can go to the View 1 tab and open its menu 17:14:01 ... you can add labels by going through Fields 17:14:05 spectranaut_: this is great 17:14:24 pkra: all the boards are set to Private — is that intentional? 17:14:35 Daniel: that’s a W3 default, I‘ll update these 17:14:51 s/W3/W3C/ 17:15:31 spectranaut_: jamesn and I will make sure every PR is in a board 17:15:46 ... in an appropriate spot 17:15:46 ... then the Normative PR tracking board 17:16:13 ... and the columns are Draft → Needs Review → Needs updates from review → Reviewed, other needs → Waiting for Implementation 17:16:25 ... any comments or questions? 17:16:39 pkra: it’s very good, thank you 17:17:21 zakim, next item 17:17:21 agendum 6 -- -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?l=&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2025-06-12+repo%3Aw3c%2Faria&type=Issues -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:17:30 spectranaut_: no new PRs 17:17:46 ... except for pkra, which we already merged — thank you 17:17:51 zakim, close this item 17:17:51 agendum 6 closed 17:17:52 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 17:17:52 7. Find reviewers for stuck things [from agendabot] 17:17:56 zakim, next item 17:17:56 agendum 7 -- Find reviewers for stuck things -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:18:08 spectranaut_: one nice thing about these new boards is we can see where our changes get stuck 17:18:22 ... in Normative, by far, most things get stuck in Needs Review 17:18:52 ... so one thing that jamesn and I discussed when we made board is that we should have mechanism for replacing idle reviewer after N days 17:19:03 ... or re-raising it to unblock it 17:20:17 pkra: looking at a few that caught my eye 17:20:22 ... we have quite a few old PRs 17:20:33 ... that might just need a rebase 17:20:36 ... to get things moving again 17:20:44 ... almost like “good first issue” 17:21:03 spectranaut_: right, a new adoptive parent 17:21:46 spectranaut_: let’s look at some of these oldest Needs Review PRs 17:21:57 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2237 17:22:18 spectranaut_: doesn’t have any reviews 17:22:29 ... some discussion about rebasing 17:24:43 frontendian-Jane: I’ll take this one 17:24:57 spectranaut_: will you confirm whether it’s actually normative? 17:25:26 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2245 17:26:05 front-endian-jane has joined #aria 17:26:25 s/frontendian-Jane/front-endian-jane/ 17:26:45 spectranaut_: added `needs ACT review` label 17:27:00 ... would be good to have a positive review on the PR 17:27:23 giacomo-petri: I’ll approve it 17:27:32 pkra: I’ll review 17:27:46 spectranaut_: great, then with ACT review we can move it along 17:27:59 present+ 17:28:11 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2292 17:29:14 spectranaut_: reviewers aren’t on the call today, so we’ll ping later 17:29:30 giacomo-petri: I think some changes are required on this one 17:32:31 spectranaut_: let’s not move forward on this one right now 17:33:18 ... https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2344 17:33:20 needs implementation consensus 17:33:45 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2339 17:34:28 ... I’ll assign this one to Rahim 17:34:41 pkra: this is one of the PRs I couldn’t move over during the monorepo merge 17:34:47 ... so Rahim manually redid it 17:35:01 ... ah I see, it was originally done by someone else 17:36:15 ... need to resolve a question from Firefox 17:36:45 s/... ah I see, it was originally done by someone else/spectranaut: ... ah I see, it was originally done by someone else/ 17:36:51 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2373 17:36:53 spectranaut_ moving on to next issue 17:37:14 ... we have one positive review 17:37:46 spectranaut_: I had offered to review this one so I will do it 17:38:39 Adam_Page: I’ll review it too 17:38:58 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2360 17:40:08 spectranaut_: there are implementors, so it likely needs implementation changes 17:40:17 ... I’ll confirm with Scott 17:42:04 spectranaut_: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2365 17:42:09 ... this is another change for implementors 17:42:13 ... need their review 17:42:24 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2369 17:42:44 ... a lot of reviewers on this one 17:42:49 ... another change coming from HTML 17:43:25 giacomo-petri: I’ll review this 17:43:57 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2390 17:44:02 spectranaut_: this has 2 positive reviews 17:44:43 ... think this just needs 1 more review 17:44:56 front-endian-jane: I’ll review 17:45:26 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2383 17:45:46 spectranaut_: yes, we talked a lot about this 17:46:22 ... still needs some resolution 17:46:37 ... I’ll ping the participants 17:47:35 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2533 17:47:46 spectranaut_: core-aam change 17:47:48 ... I’ll review and land it 17:48:06 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2526 17:48:22 spectranaut_: I’ll ping Rahim on this 17:48:47 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2504 17:49:09 spectranaut_: 2 approving reviews 17:49:49 ... looks like this is ready to land, just need to confirm with jcraig 17:50:01 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2484 17:50:25 spectranaut_: let’s skip this one 17:51:08 spectranaut_: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2483 17:51:14 pkra: this an interesting one, needs discussion 17:52:32 ... there are complex scoping implications 17:52:43 ... this is a glaring example 17:52:55 ... the `group` role 17:53:27 spectranaut_: we’ll discuss next week since it’s agenda’d 17:54:15 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2418 17:54:33 spectranaut_: this is a SHOULD 17:55:14 ... needs 1 more reviewer 17:55:54 pkra: we may need to change “parent” to “ancestor”? 17:56:42 ... this relates back to aria#2483 17:57:02 spectranaut_: once we resolve that issue, there may be many instances like this to refactor 17:57:08 ... so maybe we can still merge this one in anticipation of that 17:57:16 pkra: does it need ACT review? 17:57:25 spectranaut_: it’s not necessarily a validation issue 17:57:46 jamesn: the reason why it’s SHOULD is often UAs introduce singletons 17:57:46 ... add the parent, then close the parent 17:57:51 ... not sure there’s consistent behavior 17:58:11 spectranaut_: surprising that this is not already in the spec 17:58:55 ... it sounds like we have consensus on this 17:58:59 ... I’m inclined to land it 17:59:14 jamesn: I’ve approved it 17:59:18 ... but there are conflicts 18:00:31 zakim, end meeting 18:00:31 As of this point the attendees have been filippo-zorzi, pkra, Adam_Page, ChrisCuellar, giacomo-petri, fromt-endian-jane, Daniel 18:00:31 RRSAgent, make minutes 18:00:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/06/19-aria-minutes.html spectranaut_ 18:00:39 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 18:00:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/06/19-aria-minutes.html Zakim 18:00:45 I am happy to have been of service, Adam_Page; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 18:00:45 Zakim has left #aria