12:10:41 RRSAgent has joined #pmwg 12:10:45 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/06/05-pmwg-irc 12:10:45 RRSAgent, make logs Public 12:10:46 Meeting: Publishing Maintenance Working Group 12:11:03 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Details 2025-06-05: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pm-wg/2025Jun/0000.html 12:11:04 Chair: wendy 12:11:04 Meeting: Publishing Maintenance Working Group Telco 12:11:04 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pm-wg/2025Jun/0000.html 12:11:05 regrets+ Gregorio, Gautier, Avneesh, Cristina, Hadrien 12:49:15 shiestyle has joined #pmwg 12:57:06 sue-neu has joined #pmwg 12:57:16 present+ 12:59:07 wendyreid has joined #pmwg 12:59:11 MasakazuKitahara has joined #pmwg 12:59:37 present+ 12:59:48 toshiakikoike has joined #pmwg 12:59:49 present+ 12:59:57 present+ 12:59:59 present+ 13:00:04 present+ 13:00:23 duga has joined #pmwg 13:00:36 chair: sue-neu 13:01:01 scribe+ 13:01:53 CharlesL has joined #pmwg 13:02:08 mgarrish has joined #pmwg 13:02:23 present+ elizabeth_kraler 13:02:33 present+ CharlesL 13:03:04 Elizabeth has joined #pmwg 13:03:10 present+ 13:03:22 present+ rdeltour 13:03:22 present+ 13:03:27 TOPIC:HTML Survey Approval 13:03:48 rdeltour has joined #pmwg 13:04:00 TOPIC: HTML Survey Approval 13:04:16 s/TOPIC:HTML Survey Approval// 13:04:19 present+ 13:04:37 sue-neu: I will share a link in chat for anyone who needs it 13:04:38 https://github.com/w3c/pm-wg/pull/21/files 13:05:08 sue-neu: Has everyone had a chance to look at the survey in its current form? 13:05:17 ... any objections to it in its current form? 13:05:54 ivan: There are some pending comments, but no reactions to those, so we might be able to add them 13:06:14 sue-neu: Brady, you were saying about "hoping to discover obstacles", any change? 13:06:26 duga: That was in response to your proposal 13:06:47 ... I thought it was strange to hope to discover obstacles, I think we will, but we shouldn't hope for it 13:06:53 sue-neu: I can commit it 13:06:57 ivan: Let's do it 13:07:42 [some technical things in the background] 13:08:00 sue-neu: Can we look at the whole thing now 13:08:10 ivan: Yes, we should have the text mostly done 13:08:45 sue-neu: Any objections to using this text for the survey? 13:08:50 duga: Same comment 13:09:15 sue-neu: We can take that bit out, I have no objection 13:09:37 duga: I had a question 4, it might have disappeared 13:09:50 q+ 13:10:00 ivan: Add it as a change request 13:10:07 duga: Will take that action item 13:10:27 sue-neu: Do we want to review it in real time or review for a week before moving ahead 13:10:33 ivan: I would like to raise an issue here 13:10:35 ack ivan 13:10:42 ivan: We can deal with it now I think 13:10:50 ... there are some new discussions on the issue list 13:11:04 LaurentLM has joined #pmwg 13:11:12 present+ 13:11:33 ... raised by someone related to Sigil, the latest comments related to an experiment with XHTML converted to HTML, reading systems today had issues 13:11:50 ... my reaction, of course there are issues, the RXs aren't build for this 13:12:17 ... the question is whether if it's easy for reading systems to adapt to HTML or a major engineering problem 13:12:17 q+ 13:12:27 q+ 13:12:32 q+ 13:12:33 ... if we publish EPUB 3.4 with this change, RS will have to change 13:12:39 ack mgarrish 13:12:57 mgarrish: I was going to respond, they may not realize that we need to go through W3C's process 13:13:17 ... we aren't publishing this right away, it's a bit of a pointless exercise, we're still trying to establish this is something to do 13:13:26 ... putting the cart in front of the horse 13:13:41 ivan: I don't want to turn this into a discussion between him and me, if you could comment 13:13:55 ... the reason I am asking, is it something we need to make clear in the survey? 13:14:03 ack LaurentLM 13:14:19 LaurentLM: Just to comment on Ivan's question, reading systems will evolve, we know that many won't 13:14:33 ... there will be fragmentation, there will be RS stuck in XML 13:15:02 ... I was speaking with the people from Dolphin EasyReader, the kind of EPUB they accept is a pure translation of DAISY XML to EPUB using special tools. 13:15:15 ... no FXL, no interactivity 13:15:26 ... anything not tied to simple EPUB doesn't work 13:15:34 ... they use a subset of EPUB based on XML 13:15:40 ... they don't have a web enginge 13:15:47 s/enginge/engine 13:15:59 LaurentLM: I spoke to others, they could, but it would be difficult 13:16:12 ... it's going to be a range for everyone, some will be easy, some hard 13:16:18 ... we'll have to check many things 13:16:25 ... even if we use a web engine 13:16:40 ... we cannot say in our communications that RS must evolve, it's not quite that simple 13:16:43 ack duga 13:17:20 duga: Sounds like EasyReader is going to have a lot of problems, I've tried this in the past without a webview, it's hard to recreate all of HTML/CSS 13:17:41 ... it's going to be a limited subset, you can't write something that works with the resources you have for an ereader 13:17:54 ... there's two approaches you can take 13:18:13 ... something like TTS, you parse the content and get the words out 13:18:25 ... you use XML and get the works 13:18:42 ... they are just throwing XML parser at it, in ingestion 13:18:53 ... arguably you just need to throw in an HTML parser 13:19:06 ... XML parsers are common, built into many platforms 13:19:22 ... new HTML parser, are they out there, are they common 13:19:33 ... if you have to write your own, that's challenging 13:19:48 ... if there aren't packages out there to use 13:20:06 ... there is all this stuff out there for XML, may not be as much for HTML 13:20:14 ... I don't know how hard this will be 13:20:38 ... alternately one person pointed out they accept HTML, and they convert it to XML 13:20:47 q+ 13:20:52 ack LaurentLM 13:20:58 LaurentLM: You've given me an idea 13:21:16 ... at the level of the RS, we could imagine for the future for when XHTML is not supported in the web engine 13:21:33 ... we could create a transform for SGML to HTML for the rendering engine 13:21:40 duga: I don't know how other people do this 13:21:56 ... for google, it never makes it to the rendering engine as XHTML, it's HTML 13:22:02 ... it's already HTML at that point 13:22:11 ... it's getting it through the rest of the system 13:22:23 ... displaying it in the final viewport, not a problem 13:22:29 ... aside from those with custom renderers 13:22:37 ... it's getting it to the renderer 13:22:57 sue-neu: For the purposes of the survey, would someone like to write up an intro that explains this is not happening tomorrow 13:23:06 ivan: I think it's a good idea 13:23:27 sue-neu: I can give it a shot 13:23:44 duga: I thought the purpose of the survey was to get people to tell us this? 13:24:01 ivan: Yes, but we are already getting comments like the one we are already getting, it might distract 13:24:25 ... just need to clarify that this is not happening right away, there is a series of changes that need to happen 13:24:48 sue-neu: I still think one purpose is to let people know this is happening and to give them a chance to contribute 13:25:00 ... there will be more buy-in if people feel they had a hand in it 13:25:17 ... having a line explaining this is the beginning of the process 13:25:42 ... we want feedback like we got from the Sigil folks, and the expertise 13:26:02 ... we need testers! 13:26:41 ivan: I just need the final text so I can create the survey page 13:26:57 sue-neu: I'll add the text, will need it reviewed 13:26:59 TOPIC: Survey Distribution 13:27:37 ivan: On that, I hope I can get it running, it'll be a W3C survey to anyone with a valid email, not W3C account 13:27:50 ... the results may not be visible for everyone 13:28:35 ... some WBS polls are restricted to Team-, Member-confidential, if it's not possible to make it public, we might have to do some copy-paste to share 13:28:56 ... how can we review the responses? 13:29:00 q? 13:29:03 q+ 13:29:28 sue-neu: Will we be sending links to this from emails to people we know, organizations? 13:29:54 ivan: The URL will go to everyone in the WG, request to spread it as far as we can 13:30:06 ... mailing lists, etc 13:30:18 ... we might think about a blog post 13:30:39 ... Susan, you know the system for doing it, something short 13:30:45 ack shiestyle 13:30:55 shiestyle: How can we prepare translated versions? 13:31:28 ivan: Two possibilities, if you do a translation to japanese, I can do a separate WBS form, or we take the text and just put both for each question 13:31:35 ... how many translations do we have? 13:31:50 shiestyle: At least we need Japanese version, and Japanese answers 13:32:02 ... after translation, I will give the text to Ivan 13:32:18 ivan: Do we want other translations? 13:32:42 ... for other countries we said the standard is in English, but we could do Chinese 13:32:44 q+ 13:33:11 sue-neu: We talked at an earlier meeting about translations, we didn't want to get into the business of translating 13:33:15 ack wendyreid 13:33:50 wendyreid: I think we said we don't need to translate into European languages, though translations are harder for Japanese and Chinese 13:34:11 …we can send the content of the survey to members from Asian countries 13:34:27 q+ 13:34:32 …and ask them to translate it if they wish, and to give us the answers translated back 13:34:36 ack ivan 13:34:53 ivan: I agree, with the additional thing we need to do for China too 13:35:08 ... we should send it to someone on the W3C team to distribute 13:35:31 sue-neu: Wendy, are you able to reach out to them for that? 13:35:34 wendyreid: Yup! 13:36:05 ivan: I'll wait for the final text, I'll get the translation from Shinya, and I'll generate the WBS form, send it to the chairs, the chairs will distribute 13:36:36 present+ rdeltour 13:36:36 Topic: Horizontal Review Process 13:37:27 ivan: This is my regular plea for assistance, when it comes time for horizontal review we will be in trouble because getting the reviews done is a long process and waiting too long will be challenging 13:37:50 ... we should have people who take on the task of filling out and checking what is required for each process 13:38:03 ... sorting through what things apply to EPUB 13:38:17 ... I'm happy to take the internationalization one, but we need volunteers for the others 13:38:18 q? 13:38:42 sue-neu: I don't know what horizontal review means, what is the process 13:39:03 q+ 13:39:11 ivan: For i18n, accessibility, security, privacy, and TAG, they have to formally review the specification before it goes to candidate recommendation CR 13:39:28 ... they mostly have questionnaires we need to fill out, they may log issues 13:39:37 ... if it's not completed, we can't move forward in the process 13:40:13 ... for example we have some issues tagged to get the i18n group's attention, like one I logged the other day 13:40:33 ... web accessibility review is a little different for us because we have a group for that 13:40:39 ... privacy and security is more challenging 13:40:53 ... we've done it before, but they groups are more active 13:41:06 ... it's a good thing, they have experience in things we don't 13:41:22 ... more secure or private environments 13:41:35 ack duga 13:42:01 duga: Question, last time we did this it was very difficult, but it was also the first time we'd ever done horizontal review for EPUB 13:42:05 ... would this time just be a diff? 13:42:11 ... review the changes, or the whole spec 13:42:32 ivan: Formal answer is its the whole spec, informal, we've already reviewed most of the spec, here is the new stuff 13:42:38 ... it will be easier this time 13:42:53 ... but I know that the security people are looking at overhauling their process 13:42:59 ... there might be more work needed 13:43:14 ... the technical point of view, it's already been reviewed 13:43:27 ... main area of comments will likely be annotations 13:43:58 TOPIC: TF Updates 13:44:02 sue-neu: Do we have any updates? 13:44:16 ... annotations hasn't met yet 13:44:21 ... comics? 13:44:35 shiestyle: Webtoons will report next week 13:44:45 ... annotations will start next week 13:45:55 sue-neu: Next steps, I'll add a line about the process to the survey, Ivan will send for translation, then Ivan will make the survey, and we'll have a link soon 13:47:20 CharlesL has left #pmwg 13:47:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:47:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/06/05-pmwg-minutes.html ivan 13:49:01 rrsagent, bye 13:49:01 I see no action items