12:03:42 RRSAgent has joined #wot 12:03:47 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-irc 12:03:47 sebastian has joined #wot 12:03:50 meeting: WoT-WG/IG 12:04:22 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool, David_Ezell, Kunihiko_Toumura, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizushima 12:04:26 chair: Koster 12:05:17 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#9_April_2025 12:07:28 present+ Josh_Thomas, Ege_Korkan 12:07:36 rrsagent, make log public 12:07:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:07:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:08:03 McCool6 has joined #wot 12:08:45 mk: have and invited expert today, but we do not see him yet. 12:08:51 Topic: Minutes 12:09:05 i|have|scribenick: jthomas| 12:09:28 i|have|topic: Guests, New Members and IEs| 12:09:38 s/and/an/ 12:09:45 s/today/candidate today/ 12:09:59 -> https://www.w3.org/2025/04/02-wot-minutes.html Apr-2 12:10:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:10:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:11:28 q? 12:11:42 mk: Any objections to approve minutes 12:11:46 ... Minutes approved from April 2nd 12:11:51 topic: Quick Items 12:12:15 mk: Any new quick items, or notices? 12:12:27 ... No new additions 12:12:35 Topic: Meetups 12:12:48 mk: No new ones coming up 12:12:57 eg: last one comments was added to github 12:13:12 i/No New/subtopic: WoT CG/ 12:13:20 subtopic: WoT JP CG 12:13:35 q+ 12:13:39 mk: With the Japan group, we are wondering if we need to continue it if there is no action from that group 12:14:28 q- 12:14:34 kaz: the group has the next call on the 28th and is getting comments from the group. We should hear new info from them. Progress is being made. 12:14:35 subtopic: Smart Cities IG 12:14:48 mk: Any updates on CLud Edge? 12:15:00 i/Any/Cloud Edge CG/ 12:15:07 mm: No progress as of yet, need some additional stakeholders. 12:15:37 topic: Liaisons 12:15:46 subtopic: Conexxus 12:16:10 de: Woking on a short term plan for the web socket binding 12:16:19 subotpic: OPC UA 12:17:30 sk: An email was sent this morning with the status, we have started the review phase and would like to expand review to the main WOT group. I have attached the latest draft for review. 12:18:03 ... Please comment on it and share the feedback based on the guide in the email. 12:18:22 s/we have/we (as the OPC UA Binding WG) have/ 12:18:31 s/WOT/WoT/ 12:18:41 ... THe wiki is updated as well with this info. Please do not share this document publicly. 12:19:01 q+ 12:19:13 s/THe/The/ 12:19:25 s/web socket/web thing - web socket/ 12:19:50 q? 12:20:10 kaz: The TD Task force need to discuss this? 12:20:19 ack k 12:20:23 sk: Please, that would be best if they can take a look 12:21:49 q+ 12:22:00 mk: ETSI report? Next meeting is April 14th. Its open to everyone in this group so if you have an interest please join. They have Webinars on Wednesday 12:22:06 q- 12:22:49 mm: More involvement would be great and if you are interested in Smart Cities this is a good group 12:23:10 mk: Any other liaisons notices? 12:23:17 Topic: Schedule 12:23:23 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Cancellations_and_Schedule_Updates Cancellations 12:24:06 mk: Any other holidays not documented? 12:24:18 Topic: Cancelations 12:24:39 mk: Next Wednesday meetings will be canceled. May 5th-9th will be canceled 12:24:55 ... Any other Cancelations? 12:25:37 Topic: Publication Milestones 12:25:51 mk: Is there anything coming up? 12:26:14 i|Is there|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/planning/schedule.md Publication schedule| 12:26:17 sk: If you click the schedule it has the current data, but it is in need of updates. We are behind. 12:26:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:26:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:26:49 q+ 12:26:59 -> https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/ Publication milestone calculator 12:27:10 mm: THese were padded some, but its the CR transition that matters on July 3rd 12:27:23 mk: We need a working draft to push to CR 12:27:37 mm: we want to try to do that two weeks before the CR 12:28:14 q? 12:28:29 kaz: we should talk about this during the chairs call. 12:28:41 Topic: Policies 12:29:03 q- 12:29:11 q+ 12:29:23 mk: Moderator policy is the only one left to review. There is a branch for this to be reviewed once I turn it into a PR 12:29:42 q+ 12:30:02 mm: This is mostly about responsibilities, there is a process to follow in selection. We need to link this 12:30:20 kaz: This process is just that we can create task forces. 12:30:37 -> https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#ReqsAllGroups W3C Process - 3.4.1. Requirements for All Chartered Groups 12:30:37 mm: so it seems we need to extend this document to have a process for selection. 12:30:45 [[ 12:30:46 A Chair may form task forces (composed of group participants) to carry out assignments for the group. The scope of these assignments must not exceed the scope of the group’s charter. A group should document the process it uses to create task forces (e.g., each task force might have an informal "charter"). Task forces do not publish technical reports; the Working Group may choose to publish their results as part of a technical report. 12:30:47 ]] 12:30:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:30:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:31:09 ... It would help to have co-moderators defined as well. 12:31:10 q- 12:31:42 i|Moderator policy is the|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/1208 Issue 1208 - [Policy Proposal] Managing moderator policy| 12:31:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:31:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:32:03 ... The process is to have a resolution and approved which is fine. We just need to define more if they need to have presentations etc. Just more clarification is needed. 12:32:53 mk: The thing with multiple moderators, our policies is to have some assignments of responsibilities 12:33:42 mm: Its really helpful to have two in case one person is not available that TF does not fall apart 12:34:16 mk: Any other points to add to the document? 12:34:27 ... Will make this into a PR for review. 12:34:47 ... Any other policies to review? 12:34:55 Topic: Task Force Leads 12:35:32 mk: Updates on profile meetings? When is the next meeting? 12:35:55 q+ 12:36:02 mm: Neither of the leads are here. They were in the middle of creating a charter. 12:36:26 q? 12:36:38 i|Updates|subtopic: Profile| 12:36:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:36:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:36:50 q- 12:37:01 ... They are not planning on having weekly meetings, but work based on PR's. They might do bi-weekly 12:37:22 kaz: I don't think everything can be handled via github 12:37:43 mk: A meeting was set every other week. 12:37:43 s/think/really think/ 12:37:59 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:38:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:38:34 i|No new ones coming|subtopic: WoT CG| 12:38:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:38:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:38:43 mk: Security Discovery is still suspended. Any change in that work? It would be nice to update the document. 12:38:56 s/Cloud Edge CG/subtopic: Cloud Edge CG/ 12:38:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:38:58 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:39:07 mm: We agreed in TPAC to review and work these documents. 12:39:43 mk: if we can activate the task force for a few weeks to go through the document. 12:39:57 i|the group has the|@@@| 12:39:58 mm: we need more people to step up and work on some things. 12:40:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:40:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:40:56 q+ 12:40:57 ... We are collecting user stories into the new use case format. We need some work to reorganize this document. My plan is to do this before me leave. 12:41:59 q? 12:42:05 .. In this mornings meeting we received several new stories that Ege is working on reviewing. It should not become a requirement without review from another TF 12:42:34 kaz: As a working group we need to discuss where to start. 12:43:04 mm: we have a process in the document and if someone has a conflict they need to bring up an issue. 12:43:17 ... We have a proposed process but no resolution to follow it. 12:45:20 ... we are currently following that process 12:45:48 mm: working through the proposals we rewrite them as user stories 12:46:55 q? 12:47:00 q+ 12:48:43 kaz: which issues should be converted to stories as priorities? 12:49:16 mm: I think we have a consensus between the two task forces. 12:49:51 kaz: we just need to clarify as if people are joining the meetings does not mean that is out to the whole group 12:50:13 mm: suggest we add it to the next meeting to resolve this topic 12:50:59 eg: One is a request for the process, and the second is what priority. So we need to define both these topics. 12:51:21 ack m 12:51:23 ack k 12:51:24 ack e 12:52:30 mm: We will review the process and Ege maybe can help on priority 12:52:39 mk: ANy other points on UC works or TF leads? 12:53:35 s/ANy/Any/ 12:53:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:53:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:54:01 Topic: Task Force Reports 12:54:50 i|Any other holidays|-> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Holidays_and_Upcoming_Events Holidays| 12:55:13 mk: Marketing TF resolved the logo issue 12:57:08 q? 12:59:25 [adjourned] 12:59:27 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:59:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/04/09-wot-minutes.html kaz 15:04:37 TallTed has joined #wot 15:05:54 Zakim has left #wot 15:56:25 bigbluehat has joined #wot 16:30:51 kaz has joined #wot