00:05:01 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 00:05:10 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 00:17:17 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 00:20:09 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 00:41:37 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 00:57:08 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 01:28:29 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 01:44:55 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 02:00:23 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 02:16:09 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 02:31:49 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 02:34:16 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 02:48:10 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 03:03:37 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 03:27:20 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 03:43:41 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 03:59:06 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 04:06:49 kaz has joined #wot-td 04:19:58 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 04:30:27 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 04:36:19 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 04:50:56 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 04:51:54 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 05:21:06 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 05:35:57 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 05:37:29 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 05:50:57 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 05:52:53 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 06:22:05 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 06:38:26 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 06:53:53 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 07:23:06 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 07:38:31 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 07:48:07 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 08:01:48 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 08:07:31 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 08:24:42 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 08:36:49 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 08:40:08 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 09:09:56 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 09:14:56 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 09:51:30 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 10:09:42 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 10:22:16 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 10:39:17 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 11:10:40 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 11:27:02 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 11:29:16 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 12:17:40 ktoumura has joined #wot-td 12:52:52 rrsagent, bye 12:52:52 I see no action items 12:52:52 Zakim has joined #wot-td 12:52:54 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 12:52:54 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-irc 12:53:10 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 2 12:57:40 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 12:57:47 rrsagent, make log public 12:57:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:57:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 12:59:19 mjk has joined #wot-td 13:01:29 present+ Michael_Koster 13:01:39 chair: Ege, Koster 13:02:12 present+ Ege_Korkan 13:02:31 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#March_12-13%2C_2025 13:09:28 dape has joined #wot-td 13:09:37 present+ Daniel_Peintner 13:09:42 present+ Toamoaki_Mizushima 13:09:42 Mizushima has joined #wot-td 13:09:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:09:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:10:05 q+ 13:10:06 q- 13:10:26 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 13:11:15 scribenick: kaz 13:11:27 topic: Agenda 13:11:41 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#March_12-13%2C_2025 Agenda for today 13:11:47 cris has joined #wot-td 13:11:58 ek: binding registry and initial connection 13:12:09 ... as well as the minutes review 13:12:13 topic: Minutes 13:12:27 -> https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-wot-td-minutes.html Mar-6 13:12:32 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 13:12:38 q? 13:12:53 ek: any remarks? 13:12:54 (none) 13:13:00 approved 13:13:31 topic: Binding registry 13:13:41 ek: yesterday we started some discussion 13:13:59 ... how to proceed with the Registry requirements document? 13:14:17 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/blob/main/registry-requirements.md Registry requirements document (MD) 13:15:20 ek: need to change the title and the document type when we publish this as a Note 13:15:34 ... (refers to an example of Web Codec Registry) 13:15:52 ... probably need to check with PLH but should be OK since this is a Note 13:16:17 q+ 13:16:57 q- 13:17:54 kaz: Technically, it's not republishing the existing "WoT Binding Templates Note" but rather publishing a new "WoT Binding Registry Document" 13:19:25 ... so don't think it would be problematic 13:19:46 ... but registry publication is rather new, so would suggest we consult with PLH to make sure 13:20:00 ek: (goes through the W3C Process document) 13:20:03 -> @@@ 13:20:51 ek: so would confirm everybody is OK with moving the content from the existing/remaining WoT Binding Templates Note to the WoT Binding Registry Document 13:20:53 q? 13:21:02 q+ 13:21:11 dp: quick question 13:21:34 ... the content will be moved but the URL of the old Note will be there. right? 13:21:43 ... what would happen with the old URL? 13:21:44 q+ 13:22:02 ack dape 13:22:11 ek: if needed, we can change the URL 13:26:03 ... but if we want to continue to use the "wot-binding-templates" URL for the WoT Binding Registry Document, we need to move the old content to a new repository 13:26:44 kaz: think it would be less confusing if we should use a new URL, e.g., "wot-binding-registry" for the new WoT Binding Registry Document 13:26:52 ek: which would be better? 13:26:56 ack k 13:27:08 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:27:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:27:27 proposal 1: Use the https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/ URL as the registry, i.e. overwrite the current content with registry 13:27:44 s|@@@|https://www.w3.org/policies/process/ W3C Process Document| 13:27:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:27:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:28:12 proposal 2: create new repository, e.g. wot-binding-templates-registry, and start fresh in that repository with the registry content. The old document will have a banner directing people to the relevant place 13:28:24 q+ 13:28:46 ca: no big preference 13:29:10 ... but if we go for the proposal 1 above, what would happen? 13:29:28 ek: the new content will be included in the index.html under wot-binding-templates 13:30:44 ca: so not describing the Binding Templates itself as we used to be doing 13:30:50 ek: right 13:31:19 ca: we can reuse this but no big preference then 13:31:58 ek: there is an Editor's Note about "Future Work" 13:32:24 ca: do we want to keep the content of this old Note? 13:33:23 ek: binding template mechanism itself is already handled by the WoT Thing Description spec 13:33:44 ... and we need to describe how to manage the registry for the WoT Binding Registry Document 13:34:20 q? 13:34:49 ca: slightly concerned about the cost to create a new repo, but not a big concern 13:36:02 ... if we're ok with creating a new repo for the Binding Registry Document, I'm OK with putting a banner saying "This Note at wot-binding-templates is obsolete." 13:36:12 dp: both solutions might work 13:36:52 ... we should make sure the old WoT Binding Templates Note is not maintained 13:36:58 ... and guide people to the new plac 13:37:02 s/plac/place/ 13:37:05 q? 13:37:07 ack c 13:37:40 ek: in that case, we can put some text on this obsolete WoT Binding Templates Note and lead them to the new Registry Document 13:37:59 ... but for today, we don't have a strong preference yet 13:38:10 ... so would create a new GitHub Issue for further discussion 13:39:09 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/421 Binding Issue 421 - Where should the registry live? 13:40:12 q? 13:40:55 ek: WoT Binding Template mechanism itself is described by the WoT Thing Description spec 13:41:52 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#binding-templates WoT Thing Description ED - 8. Binding Templates 13:42:17 ek: which repository to put the actual registry information? 13:42:30 topic: Initial Connection 13:42:41 ek: how to proceed? 13:43:07 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/tree/main/proposals/initial-connection proposal 13:43:20 ek: our proposal is available online as MD above 13:43:39 q+ 13:43:39 ... should we include the proposal into the WoT Thing Description Editor's Draft now? 13:44:23 ca: is the new tooling ready? 13:44:26 ek: not yet 13:44:40 ca: what would be the impact of the tooling change then? 13:44:53 ek: potentially big impacts... 13:45:12 q+ 13:45:20 ca: would be better to clarify possible algorithm, etc., first then 13:45:23 ack c 13:46:03 ek: so you mean we should update the index.html itself until the tooling is ready? 13:46:06 ca: right 13:46:13 q? 13:46:17 q+ 13:46:37 ek: tables and diagrams will be changed 13:46:43 ... they're all normative 13:47:01 s/they're/tables are/ 13:47:04 q? 13:47:18 dp: thinking now... 13:47:36 ... with this initial connection, we could get much flexibility 13:47:53 ... but wondering about the usage from the users' viewpoint 13:48:09 ... maybe we can say we just define TD 13:48:35 ... and another spec about how to use TD could mention this 13:48:46 ... simpler version TD and full version TD 13:49:08 ek: simplified vs condense/full 13:49:20 ack d 13:49:49 ... there will be some changes other than this proposal 13:50:21 ... (goes through Table 3) 13:50:30 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#table-vocabulary-terms-in-thing-level TD ED - Table 3 13:51:00 dp: might be going to be too difficult to use the full spec TD around reusable connection 13:51:15 ek: maybe would be better to add restructure 13:52:12 kaz: tend to agree with Daniel 13:52:23 ... the initial/reusable connection proposal is getting bigger 13:52:34 ... so should think about how to put the proposal into the TD spec 13:52:59 ... as Daniel also mentioned, might be better to have another separate document about TD connection for this 13:53:58 ek: don't want to have a separate document... 13:54:15 kaz: we're not really suggesting we should have a separate document for today 13:54:31 ... but would suggest we should think about the document structure a bit more 13:54:52 q- 13:55:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:55:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:55:37 ek: (crates a new TD GitHub Issue for this discussion) 13:55:55 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2089 TD Issue 2089 - Moving ahead with the initial connections feature 13:55:58 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:56:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:56:39 s/connections/connection/ 13:56:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:56:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 13:57:06 q? 13:57:30 s/crates/creates/ 13:57:35 topic: TD Project 13:57:56 -> https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80 TD Project 13:58:29 subtopic: Issue 2084 13:58:40 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2084 Issue 2084 - Better description for EventAffordance subscription and cancellation 13:58:51 ek: would talk about it next time 13:58:59 topic: AOB 13:59:27 ek: next week, we'll have informal discussion about Conexxus liaison on Wednesday 13:59:40 ... the call will start 30 mins later than usual 13:59:51 [adjourned] 13:59:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:59:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/13-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:02:14 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 14:13:56 EgeKorka_ has joined #wot-td 15:03:03 zkis has joined #wot-td 15:24:14 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 15:38:12 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 16:01:49 Zakim has left #wot-td 17:45:13 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 19:34:16 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 21:39:10 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 23:16:36 JKRhb has joined #wot-td