14:03:06 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 14:03:10 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-irc 14:03:15 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 1 14:04:18 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima 14:04:18 chair: Ege, Koster 14:04:38 rrsagent, make log public 14:04:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:04:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:04:58 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#March_12-13%2C_2025 14:06:15 scribe: dape 14:08:03 TOPIC: Minutes Review 14:08:13 -> https://www.w3.org/2025/03/05-wot-td-minutes.html Mar-5 14:08:13 -> https://www.w3.org/2025/03/05-wot-td-minutes.html 14:08:50 EK: Any remarks? 14:09:08 ... none -> minutes are approved 14:09:26 TOPIC: Next week 14:09:41 EK: Kaz is not available both days Wed/Thu 14:09:45 ... changes to agenda 14:10:01 ... Wed: Connexus special call 14:10:03 q+ 14:10:46 ... not a normal taskforce call.. but still relevant for all of us 14:10:56 Kaz: I am sorry I cannot make it 14:11:21 q- 14:11:33 ... we can call that "Informal Discussion about Connexxus liaison" 14:11:51 EK: On Thursday: Informal meeting. Informal means working/refining issues but not merging PRs 14:12:15 ... the week after, we cancel call on March 27th 14:12:23 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 14:12:36 TOPICS: PRs 14:13:02 @JKRhb are you joining the call? 14:13:39 cris has joined #wot-td 14:14:33 SUBTOPIC: PR 2086 14:14:35 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2086 14:15:01 EK: Template is now working 14:15:19 ... simple fix to show up properly 14:15:34 ... editorial vs. normative 14:15:36 +1 14:15:52 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2086|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2086 TD PR 2086 - PR Template: Remove Checkboxes| 14:16:05 EK: No concerns, merging 14:16:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:16:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:16:22 SUBTOPIC: PR 2081 14:16:28 s/@JKRhb are you joining the call?// 14:16:35 s/2081/2080 14:16:37 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2080 14:16:57 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 14:17:21 EK: about not validating TDs with JSON schema 14:17:32 ... URI enforcement etc 14:17:42 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2080|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2080 TD PR 2080 - fix: align JSON Schema with JSON-LD @context format| 14:18:14 ... tool I shared is not working as expected 14:18:50 ... I don't understand the problem 14:19:04 ... real problem is minor errata 14:19:33 ... prefixItems term is only introduced in newer version of JSON schema 14:19:48 ... term "items" should be used instead 14:20:01 ... Hence we have a small errata 14:20:55 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 14:21:09 ... changing "prefixItems" with "items" solved this issue 14:21:16 ... "contains" no longer needed 14:21:36 ... we should add tests in playground 14:22:14 present+ Jan_Romann 14:23:08 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:23:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:23:15 JR: Do I need to update the PR? 14:23:15 EK: I did already 14:23:30 s/TOPICS:/topic:/ 14:23:32 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:23:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:24:15 q+ 14:24:21 EK: Question allowing old context URL ... comment there 14:25:06 CA: I am not 100% sure why it is there 14:25:21 ... I think it is there for backwards compatibility 14:25:42 ... I think Ben was also advocating for it 14:26:06 q? 14:26:11 ack c 14:26:39 EK: I hope people are fine with the changes 14:27:08 ... I have done tests on playground 14:27:57 ... I didn't encounter any issues 14:28:36 -> https://github.com/eclipse-thingweb/playground/pull/626 related playground PR 626 - Update schema to test context urls 14:28:44 q+ 14:28:52 ... putting it to wot-resources requires resolution 14:29:10 q+ 14:29:14 JR: Minor point. We need to update thing model schema as well 14:29:19 EK: Right 14:29:40 CA: I am okay moving it to wot-resources 14:29:48 ... it is just a corner case 14:29:48 +1 14:30:00 ... Some previous TDs can fail now, right? 14:30:19 EK: Yes, TD could have a number for context and would fail now. 14:31:01 proposal: The changes to the TD and TM JSON Schemas in https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2080 can be mirrored to wot-resources 14:31:54 EK: Errata needs to be updated 14:34:28 +1 14:34:30 ... I will send email to ask for a resolution 14:34:33 resolution: The changes to the TD and TM JSON Schemas in https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2080 can be mirrored to wot-resources 14:35:48 EK: closing PR 2088 14:36:41 SUBTOPIC: PR 2081 14:36:43 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2081 14:37:01 EK: I think there hasn't been any update 14:37:28 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2081|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2081 TD PR 2081 - Make contentType optional in ExpectedResponse and AdditionalExpectedResponse classes| 14:37:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:37:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:37:58 ... Ben responded with "not liking global default being removed" 14:38:25 ... not an issue with initial connections 14:39:21 CA: contentType is not strictly needed for TD2.0 14:40:08 ... 1 step of a more complex solution that is going to come 14:42:06 TOPIC: Binding Registry 14:42:44 SUBTOPIC: PR 420 14:42:47 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/pull/420 Binding PR 420 - Binding Dependencies 14:43:12 EK: Replaced *weird* paragraph 14:43:46 ... summary document must contain dependencies 14:44:21 ... binding shall not be redefined 14:44:42 ... dependency must be submitted as a separate entity 14:45:09 ... we roughly agreed on last week 14:45:11 q+ 14:45:29 ... issue 401 14:45:32 q? 14:45:42 ack cri 14:45:42 JR: Changes look good 14:45:57 ... should it be possible to specify version ranges? 14:46:09 ... patch releases? 14:46:23 i|Changes look|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/401 related Binding Issue 401 - Handling Bindings that depend on other bindings| 14:46:25 ... or is that going to be too complicated 14:46:38 EK: Yes, seems complicated 14:46:47 JR: Okay, let's defer this discussion 14:47:03 q? 14:47:05 ack j 14:47:06 ack JKRhb 14:47:28 EK: I think we can merge PR 420 14:47:37 mjk has joined #wot-td 14:48:12 SUBTOPIC: Issue 400 14:48:35 https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/400 14:49:11 EK: For now, we say version is a string 14:49:32 ... we cannot say "semantic versioning" 14:49:34 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/400|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/400 Binding Issue 400 - Versioning of Registry Entries| 14:49:57 ... we can discuss versioning mechanism 14:50:11 ... or submitter uses its own versioning mechanism 14:50:21 q+ 14:50:32 ... most users unique version should be enough 14:50:52 ... so far we do not do any versioning in bindings 14:51:05 q+ 14:51:13 q+ 14:51:55 Kaz: We need a mechanism in the end 14:52:34 ... can think about semantics and registry entry 14:52:57 .... we need to think about semantic versioning of registry 14:53:01 q- 14:53:07 s/We need/Maybe we need/ 14:53:26 EK: You are saying we should understand first how people use the registry? 14:53:28 Kaz: Yes 14:54:28 CA: For us, it is important to have a defined order between the versions 14:54:34 q- 14:54:40 ... like concept of "latest" version 14:54:48 s/can think about semantics and registry entry/but maybe the registry mechanism could handle necessary versioning automatically/ 14:54:55 ... I think we should enforce that 14:55:17 ... otherwise any versioning scheme might work 14:55:56 ack cris 14:56:24 s/.... we need to think about semantic versioning of registry/... so probably we should think about what kind of semantic versioning is needed for registry entries a bit more based on concrete usage./ 14:56:29 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:56:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:57:14 q? 14:57:41 EK: I don't see strong opinions 14:57:48 ... no concrete proposal yet 14:58:13 ...based on CAs proposal, the date seems to be important 15:00:13 q+ 15:00:46 ack c 15:00:58 [adjourned] 15:01:09 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:01:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 16:25:28 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 16:26:41 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 16:48:03 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:19:25 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:28:03 Zakim has left #wot-td 17:35:46 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:36:39 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 17:51:11 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:52:25 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:08:54 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:22:35 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:25:16 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:29:40 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:34:06 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 18:59:27 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:15:04 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:44:18 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 20:00:39 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 20:16:06 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 20:30:19 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 20:45:21 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 21:01:42 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 21:01:42 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 21:17:06 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 21:18:03 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 21:33:37 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 21:46:19 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:00:55 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 22:02:40 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:17:16 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 22:18:08 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:32:43 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 22:47:21 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:01:56 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 23:03:43 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:18:17 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 23:19:08 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:33:44 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 23:48:21 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td