18:00:37 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #aria
18:00:41 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-aria-irc
18:00:41 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
18:00:42 <Zakim> Meeting: ARIA WG
18:00:47 <spectranaut_> chair: ValerieYoung
18:00:49 <spectranaut_> agendabot, find agenda
18:00:49 <agendabot> spectranaut_, OK. This may take a minute...
18:00:50 <agendabot> agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/e5c2b1c4-6993-483f-a624-cb260c163e44/20250306T130000/
18:00:50 <agendabot> clear agenda
18:00:50 <agendabot> agenda+ -> New Issue Triage https://tinyurl.com/26ce3ajn
18:00:50 <agendabot> agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?l=&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2025-02-28+repo%3Aw3c%2Faria&type=Issues
18:00:53 <agendabot> agenda+ -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y
18:00:55 <agendabot> agenda+ -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates
18:00:58 <agendabot> agenda+ Daylight Savings starts 9 March in the U.S. For Europeans, that means meetings will be an hour earlier until the 30th.
18:01:01 <agendabot> agenda+ Resolution to move DPUB to PR now that https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2459 has been merged?
18:01:04 <agendabot> agenda+ Cancel next weeks meeting due to CSUN?
18:01:07 <agendabot> agenda+ -> ARIA IDL updates: convert eligible attributes to enumerated, new ARIA IDL guidance and examples https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2413
18:01:10 <agendabot> agenda+ -> Aligning HTML spec with ARIA's style of DOMString? reflection https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2414
18:01:13 <agendabot> agenda+ -> Does aria-atomic have real-world use cases? https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2458
18:01:16 <agendabot> agenda+ -> Consider supporting multiline comboboxes https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2456
18:01:25 <agendabot> agenda+ -> Group as allowed acc child of role menu if acc child of menuitem https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2438
18:01:36 <giacomo-petri4> giacomo-petri4 has joined #aria
18:01:54 <giacomo-petri> giacomo-petri has joined #aria
18:01:59 <giacomo-petri> present+
18:02:10 <hdv> present+
18:02:13 <Daniel> present+
18:02:20 <filippo-zorzi> filippo-zorzi has joined #aria
18:02:20 <pkra> present+
18:02:35 <Adam_Page> scribe: Adam_Page
18:02:39 <Adam_Page> present+
18:02:43 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:02:43 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- -> New Issue Triage https://tinyurl.com/26ce3ajn -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:03:00 <Francis_Storr> Francis_Storr has joined #aria
18:03:05 <katez> katez has joined #aria
18:03:10 <katez> present+
18:03:16 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: a few from pkra that are editorial
18:03:22 <Francis_Storr> present+
18:03:32 <Adam_Page> pkra: technicalities; we can talk in the editors meeting
18:03:55 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: another editorial for aria#2462
18:03:59 <Adam_Page> pkra: this is for editors
18:04:12 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: aria#2461
18:04:37 <Adam_Page> Rahim: would be valuable to see how mappings are implemented
18:04:45 <Adam_Page> ... and see where they’re actually declared in the source code
18:04:56 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: should we schedule a meeting for this?
18:05:01 <Adam_Page> Rahim: yes, please
18:05:10 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: aria#2460
18:05:14 <zakk> zakk has joined #aria
18:05:20 <zakk> present+
18:05:27 <Adam_Page> ... conflict for common use of <label> radio buttons
18:05:41 <Adam_Page> ... the relevant HTML is the first example
18:06:18 <Adam_Page> ... should we agenda thia?
18:06:27 <Adam_Page> pkra: seems like a misunderstanding
18:06:52 <Rahim> present+
18:06:52 <Rahim> q+
18:07:19 <Adam_Page> ... please assign to me; I’ll ask for clarification
18:07:25 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: okay, and feel free to agenda it
18:07:45 <Adam_Page> Rahim: Scott raised an issue last year about grouping non-contiguous radio buttons, this seems related
18:07:56 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: please link that issue if it’s relevant
18:07:59 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:07:59 <Zakim> I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Adam_Page
18:08:04 <Adam_Page> q?
18:08:06 <Adam_Page> ack Rahim
18:08:06 <spectranaut_> ack Rahim
18:08:18 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:08:18 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:08:18 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- -> New PR Triage https://github.com/search?l=&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+created%3A%3E%3D2025-02-28+repo%3Aw3c%2Faria&type=Issues -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:08:21 <Zakim> agendum 2 was just opened, Adam_Page
18:08:26 <sarah> sarah has joined #aria
18:08:34 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: new PR from PDF-AAM
18:08:37 <sarah> present+
18:08:45 <Adam_Page> ... aria#2466
18:08:57 <Adam_Page> ... we have reviewers assigned already
18:08:57 <Adam_Page> ... should we also agenda this to discuss?
18:08:59 <StefanS> StefanS has joined #aria
18:09:06 <Adam_Page> zakk: yes, please
18:09:21 <StefanS> present+
18:09:30 <Adam_Page> ... this is the initial import for each AAM mapping
18:09:38 <Adam_Page> ... this is an export from our Google spreadsheet
18:09:49 <np-at7> np-at7 has joined #aria
18:09:50 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: let’s let the reviewers get to it
18:10:00 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: aria#2464, from pkra
18:10:03 <Adam_Page> pkra: mostly for editors
18:10:18 <np-at> present+
18:10:18 <Adam_Page> ... our CI isn’t working as expected
18:10:21 <Adam_Page> ... this is also a warning to anyone with an open PR
18:10:48 <Adam_Page> ... I’ll finish this and update all the open PRs
18:10:55 <Adam_Page> ... but the older ones will be difficult because of merge conflicts
18:11:06 <Adam_Page> ... let’s merge this one, and then I’ll rebase others
18:11:14 <scott> scott has joined #aria
18:12:05 <scott> fyi - james craig is running late today, and may not be able to attend.  i'm also not really here.  bye
18:12:53 <Adam_Page> pkra: a couple minor changes to other specs because prettier is running on them, so we need to talk about it on the editors side
18:13:10 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: I’ll review this
18:13:13 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:13:13 <Zakim> agendum 3 -- -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:14:18 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: wpt#51107
18:14:33 <Adam_Page> Rahim: at the beginning of the year, the Interop gropu had to roll back some tests
18:14:38 <Adam_Page> ... to prevent them from being counted in 2024
18:14:47 <Adam_Page> ... so this is just reverting those back in
18:15:18 <Adam_Page> ... this specific one has to do with the multiple aria-labelledby spellings
18:15:21 <Adam_Page> ... so I’ll review
18:15:25 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: and then we can merge
18:15:27 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:15:27 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- -> Deep Dive planning https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:15:50 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: SVG is scheduled for week after this
18:15:56 <Adam_Page> ... I’ll make an event for that
18:16:18 <Adam_Page> ... also, heads-up that an accname whitepsace deep dive we had scheduled for Dec will be rescheduled for either March or early April
18:16:22 <giacomo-petri> q+
18:16:23 <Adam_Page> ... keep an eye out
18:17:16 <Adam_Page> giacomo-petri: the cards deep dive can be removed from this list
18:17:20 <Adam_Page> pkra: can we close the issue?
18:17:30 <Adam_Page> giacomo-petri: yes, I think so
18:17:39 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: I’ll close it (aria#2162)
18:18:18 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: would you like to talk about any of these others?
18:18:37 <Adam_Page> giacomo-petri: html-aam#562 is about browser heuristics with tables
18:18:43 <siri> siri has joined #aria
18:18:45 <Adam_Page> ... but not ready to discuss yet
18:18:49 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:18:49 <Zakim> I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Adam_Page
18:18:53 <Adam_Page> q?
18:18:55 <Adam_Page> ack giacomo-petri
18:18:57 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:18:57 <Zakim> agendum 5 -- Daylight Savings starts 9 March in the U.S. For Europeans, that means meetings will be an hour earlier until the 30th. -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:18:59 <siri> present+
18:19:12 <Adam_Page> 😭
18:19:26 <giacomo-petri> better for EU people
18:19:28 <giacomo-petri> :D
18:19:45 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: meetings will be an hour earlier until the 30th
18:19:47 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:19:47 <Zakim> agendum 5 was just opened, Adam_Page
18:19:58 <Adam_Page> zakim, close this item
18:19:58 <Zakim> agendum 5 closed
18:19:59 <Zakim> I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
18:19:59 <Zakim> 6. Resolution to move DPUB to PR now that https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2459 has been merged? [from agendabot]
18:20:18 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:20:18 <Zakim> agendum 6 -- Resolution to move DPUB to PR now that https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2459 has been merged? -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:20:28 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: a few weeks ago we discussed this issue from giacomo-petri
18:20:37 <Adam_Page> ... there’s a normative change, so not fully editorial
18:21:05 <Adam_Page> Daniel: yes, a name from author change
18:21:12 <giacomo-petri> q+
18:21:34 <Adam_Page> ... I’ll argue for editorial, but chances are we’ll need to go back to a candidate review snapshot
18:21:49 <Adam_Page> ... giacomo-petri also raised some other issues
18:22:01 <Adam_Page> giacomo-petri: the other ones should be editorial
18:22:18 <Adam_Page> ... but I think I found a separate mistake related to doc page break
18:22:57 <Adam_Page> ... the examples disagree with the actual requirement
18:23:11 <pkra> q+ do we know if this is an aria.js problem?
18:23:15 <Adam_Page> Daniel: okay, we should wait on this
18:23:39 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: for the minutes, does everyone agree that this is editorial?
18:23:49 <Adam_Page> ... or should we resolve these outstanding issues first?
18:23:55 <spectranaut_> ack giacomo-petri
18:23:58 <spectranaut_> ack pkra
18:24:05 <Adam_Page> pkra: is this in the spec, or something that ARIA JS is causing?
18:24:21 <Adam_Page> ... the other issues, I mean, like page breaks
18:24:39 <Adam_Page> ... in the spec itself, or maybe a problem with ARIA JS, JSON, child stuff that populates some of the inherited properties from the main spec
18:24:45 <Adam_Page> Daniel: not sure, will need to check
18:25:04 <pkra> ack pkra
18:25:06 <Adam_Page> pkra: if the latter, then the problem is with the automation, and we’ll need to fix that rather than the spec
18:25:35 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: Daniel, is there a chance we could still move to PR if the WG agrees that the changes are editorial?
18:25:45 <Adam_Page> Daniel: just this PR that just landed?
18:25:47 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: yes
18:25:53 <spectranaut_> this PR: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2459
18:26:22 <Adam_Page> Daniel: we have a high risk that if we send this to PR that it will be rejected for not being editorial
18:26:48 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: do people agree to try for PR?
18:26:52 <pkra> +1
18:27:19 <hdv> 0
18:27:23 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: any objections?
18:28:43 <Adam_Page> Daniel: if it gets rejected, then it will be delayed by another ~6 months
18:29:09 <Adam_Page> pkra: I did just confirm that the valuenow issue giacomo-petri discovered *is* an automation issue; not a spec issue
18:29:54 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: no objections, so please do go ahead with proposal to move to PR
18:30:35 <Daniel> RESOLUTION Move DPUB to PR as the group considers adding the superclass role as an editorial change
18:30:35 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:30:35 <Zakim> agendum 7 -- Cancel next weeks meeting due to CSUN? -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:31:42 <Daniel> s/RESOLUTION M/RESOLUTION: M/
18:31:43 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: we don’t need to cancel
18:31:54 <Adam_Page> ... since many of us won’t be attending CSUN
18:31:57 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:31:57 <Zakim> agendum 8 -- -> ARIA IDL updates: convert eligible attributes to enumerated, new ARIA IDL guidance and examples https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2413 -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:32:19 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: Rahim, you brought this PR back
18:32:27 <Adam_Page> Rahim: this was a draft PR, and now it’s ready for review
18:32:35 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:32:35 <Zakim> agendum 8 was just opened, Adam_Page
18:32:41 <Adam_Page> zakim, close this item
18:32:41 <Zakim> agendum 8 closed
18:32:42 <Zakim> I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
18:32:42 <Zakim> 9. -> Aligning HTML spec with ARIA's style of DOMString? reflection https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2414 [from agendabot]
18:32:45 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:32:45 <Zakim> agendum 9 -- -> Aligning HTML spec with ARIA's style of DOMString? reflection https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2414 -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:33:20 <Adam_Page> Rahim: at TPAC, we discussed ways of improving IDL
18:33:24 <Adam_Page> ... for ARIA attribute reflection
18:33:32 <Adam_Page> ... what motivated this work is that attributes have 2 aspects:
18:33:35 <Adam_Page> .... the content attribute
18:33:43 <Adam_Page> ... and the IDL attribute, formerly known as the DOM property
18:33:49 <Adam_Page> ... those are accessors on JS objects
18:33:52 <Adam_Page> ... correlating to DOM nodes
18:33:59 <Adam_Page> ... every node gets a JS wrapper
18:34:18 <Adam_Page> ... IDL comes into play when we want the JS representation to synchronize with the underlying C++ implementations
18:34:18 <Adam_Page> ... always synced, always aligned
18:34:23 <Adam_Page> ... we call that “reflection”
18:34:38 <Adam_Page> ... aria-expanded ~= foo.ariaExpanded
18:34:51 <Adam_Page> ... ensures the API types make sense for that they are
18:34:55 <Adam_Page> ... boolean attributes are true/false
18:35:07 <Adam_Page> ... nullable strings, non-nullable strings, etc.
18:35:26 <Adam_Page> ... there should be no difference between reflected attributes
18:35:41 <Adam_Page> ... this specific PR has to do with nullable DOM string
18:35:58 <Adam_Page> ... as part of the getter, when the browser gets the value, it no longer checks to make sure the attribute is enumerated
18:36:05 <Adam_Page> ... previously there was a check
18:36:18 <Adam_Page> ... this issue loosened that getter
18:36:29 <Adam_Page> ... so we have plenty of attributes that aren’t enumerated
18:36:38 <Adam_Page> ... that we want to reflect as nullable DOM strings
18:36:49 <Adam_Page> ... so that we can determine the absence of the string
18:37:00 <Adam_Page> ... tl;dr we now have the ability to align with the HTML spec
18:37:13 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: this is really great
18:37:21 <Adam_Page> ... been an outstanding issue for a while
18:37:38 <Adam_Page> ... is this issue closeable when we land the PR?
18:37:44 <Adam_Page> Rahim: the PR has landed on the HTML side
18:37:48 <Adam_Page> ... and approved by HTML editors
18:37:53 <Adam_Page> ... no implementation work is required
18:38:00 <Adam_Page> ... really just a spec bug that was fixed
18:38:05 <Adam_Page> ... we can close the ARIA issue now
18:38:19 <Adam_Page> ... this was the easy one
18:38:43 <Adam_Page> zakim, take up item 8
18:38:43 <Zakim> agendum 8 -- -> ARIA IDL updates: convert eligible attributes to enumerated, new ARIA IDL guidance and examples https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2413 -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:38:57 <Adam_Page> Rahim: going back to this PR
18:39:00 <Adam_Page> ... after that TPAC discussion
18:39:11 <Adam_Page> ... we talked about improving IDL
18:39:23 <Adam_Page> ... there was consensus that the ARIA WG should really start treating more attributes as enumerated
18:39:45 <Adam_Page> ... enumerated attrs have a very specific definition in the HTML spec
18:39:56 <Adam_Page> ... treated in a distinct way
18:40:02 <Adam_Page> ... for example, the `type` attribute for <input>
18:40:18 <Adam_Page> ... there are a finite number of states
18:40:18 <Adam_Page> ... when missing or invalid, it defaults to `type=text`
18:40:29 <Adam_Page> ... this aligns well many ARIA attributes
18:40:46 <Adam_Page> ... so this PR re-defines many attributes as enumerated
18:40:50 <Adam_Page> ... the same way HTML attributes are treated
18:40:58 <Adam_Page> ... you can review them all in the PR
18:41:03 <Adam_Page> ... I also updated values table
18:41:09 <Adam_Page> ... specified missing values
18:41:16 <Adam_Page> ... clarified undefined
18:41:24 <Adam_Page> ... and also allows us to update our values schema
18:41:24 <sarah> q+
18:41:45 <Adam_Page> ... now we can have enumerated values that will really capture how things are handled on the HTML side
18:42:00 <spectranaut_> ack sarah
18:42:18 <Adam_Page> sarah: I saw aria-valuemin and arai-valuemax and aria-valuenow are all in there
18:42:18 <Adam_Page> ... is that intentional?
18:42:21 <Adam_Page> ... those stood out to me as ones that should accept any numerical value
18:42:42 <Adam_Page> Rahim: I think you’re right, those should be reflected as numeric values
18:42:52 <Adam_Page> ... but there’s no role-specific reflection for those
18:43:04 <Adam_Page> ... no, those won’t be enumerated
18:43:57 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: let’s get some more reviewers, it’s a big change
18:44:17 <Adam_Page> ... and normative
18:44:23 <Adam_Page> Rahim: jcraig should definitely be a reviewer
18:44:44 <Adam_Page> ... I’d like keithamus’ review as well
18:44:48 <Adam_Page> keithamus: sure thing
18:44:59 <Adam_Page> Rahim: this will need some implementor changes
18:45:08 <Adam_Page> ... on the Webkit side, we can remove some custom code and just use the IDL engine
18:45:19 <Adam_Page> ... there’s custom logic we can remove/simplify
18:45:30 <Adam_Page> keithamus: very likely that the other browsers will have a similar situation
18:45:41 <Adam_Page> ... custom C++ that can be removed
18:45:58 <Adam_Page> Rahim: on the Chromium side, reflect is not part of the HTML spec
18:46:18 <Adam_Page> ... it’s an “extended” attribute, so technically not part of spec
18:46:27 <Adam_Page> ... but on the Chromium side there’s reflectInvalid and reflectMissing, which is novel
18:46:38 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: do we need more browser people to take a look at this?
18:47:13 <Adam_Page> Rahim: maybe doesn’t need implementor eyes on it yet, just that the ARIA WG is satisfied with the PR
18:48:45 <Adam_Page> Rahim: on the HTML side, there’s an IDL block for every interface
18:48:51 <Adam_Page> ... wasn’t sure if we wanted to do that in ARIA
18:49:16 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: let’s do these reviews offline
18:49:25 <Adam_Page> ... I’ll also review
18:49:27 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:49:27 <Zakim> agendum 9 -- -> Aligning HTML spec with ARIA's style of DOMString? reflection https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2414 -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:49:36 <Adam_Page> zakim, close this item
18:49:36 <Zakim> agendum 9 closed
18:49:37 <Zakim> I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
18:49:37 <Zakim> 10. -> Does aria-atomic have real-world use cases? https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2458 [from agendabot]
18:49:38 <Adam_Page> zakim, next item
18:49:39 <Zakim> agendum 10 -- -> Does aria-atomic have real-world use cases? https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2458 -- taken up [from agendabot]
18:50:18 <Adam_Page> Aaron: when ARIA was first being conceived
18:50:28 <Adam_Page> ... how are we going to deal with content changing on the screen
18:50:32 <Adam_Page> ... and we invented live regions
18:50:46 <Adam_Page> ... and then “what if one node changes in a region?”
18:50:51 <Adam_Page> ... we didn’t know the answer
18:50:55 <Adam_Page> ... so we created aria-atomic
18:50:59 <Adam_Page> ... so that people can control it
18:51:13 <Adam_Page> ... but when I see it in markup, it’s usually the author didn’t know what it was for
18:51:25 <Adam_Page> ... and recently TalkBack started to improve web support
18:51:33 <Adam_Page> ... and they asked “is aria-atomic important?”
18:51:44 <sarah> q+
18:51:54 <Adam_Page> ... if use cases are only theoretical, then I’ll tell them to de-prioritize it
18:51:57 <spectranaut_> ack sarah
18:52:19 <Adam_Page> sarah: I have had cases where I wanted to use it in the past but didn’t because of the lack of support
18:52:22 <Adam_Page> ... not worth doing with partial support
18:52:32 <Adam_Page> ... inconsistency is worse than nothing at all
18:53:08 <Adam_Page> ... usually when there are surgical DOM changes like that, I’ve just found that custom visually hidden live regions is a better use case
18:53:15 <Adam_Page> ... and will be handled even better by ariaNotify
18:53:23 <hdv> +1 to Sarah's point
18:53:36 <hdv> q+
18:53:44 <spectranaut_> ack hdv
18:53:57 <Adam_Page> hdv: I’ve also been thinking about use cases
18:54:18 <Adam_Page> ... and came up empty for this
18:54:37 <Adam_Page> Aaron: can we keep it in the spec but deprecate it?
18:54:44 <Adam_Page> ... add a note that it’s not consistently supported now
18:55:21 <Adam_Page> sarah: we might want to poll people who work on smaller things with less infrastructure than the big enterprise applications I work on
18:55:44 <filippo-zorzi> present+
18:56:04 <Adam_Page> Aaron: let’s say you have a word processor with a status bar showing the row and column your cursor is on
18:56:22 <Adam_Page> ... I think the idea was that you could have a label in front of it
18:56:32 <Adam_Page> ... you could put aria-atomic around the value that the label is pointing to
18:56:56 <Adam_Page> sarah: yeah, that’s similar to things I’ve encountered in the past
18:57:49 <hdv> +1 to deprecate aria-atomic
18:57:52 <Adam_Page> spectranaut_: is anyone against deprecating
18:58:18 <Adam_Page> ... no
18:58:23 <Adam_Page> ... RESOLUTION: deprecate
18:58:47 <Adam_Page> zakim, end meeting
18:58:47 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been pkra, giacomo-petri, hdv, Daniel, Adam_Page, keithamus, katez, Francis_Storr, zakk, Rahim, sarah, StefanS, np-at, siri, filippo-zorzi
18:58:50 <Zakim> RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
18:58:52 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-aria-minutes.html Zakim
18:58:59 <Zakim> I am happy to have been of service, Adam_Page; please remember to excuse RRSAgent.  Goodbye
18:58:59 <Zakim> Zakim has left #aria
19:03:14 <Adam_Page> s/... RESOLUTION: deprecate/RESOLUTION: deprecate `aria-atomic` in the spec
19:03:19 <Adam_Page> zakim, make minutes
19:03:36 <Adam_Page> rrsagent, make minutes
19:03:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-aria-minutes.html Adam_Page