14:39:06 RRSAgent has joined #wpwg 14:39:10 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-irc 14:39:15 Zakim has joined #wpwg 14:39:50 Meeting: Web Payments Working Group 14:40:14 Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Agenda-20250213 14:40:30 Chair: Nick Telford-Reed 14:40:37 Scribe: Nick Telford-Reed 14:41:03 Regrets: Gerard Oosthuizen 14:41:33 scribenick: nicktr 14:42:22 agenda+ Proposal to take up Faciliated Payments Link in WPWG Charter 14:42:47 agenda+ Relationship to Web Monetization proposal 14:43:08 agenda+ Update on SPC browser based key implementation 14:43:29 agenda+ Update on the isSecurePaymentConfirmationAvailable API 14:43:41 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:43:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-minutes.html nicktr 14:44:17 RRSAgent, set logs public 14:44:58 zakim, bye 14:44:58 Zakim has left #wpwg 14:45:08 Zakim has joined #wpwg 14:45:14 agenda? 14:45:26 I didn't see you had done everything. 14:45:28 I'll restore it 14:45:43 Meeting: Web Payments Working Group 14:45:48 Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Agenda-20250213 14:45:54 Chair: Nick Telford-Reed 14:46:03 Scribe: Nick Telford-Reed 14:46:10 Regrets: Gerard Oosthuizen, Ian Jacobs 14:46:16 v 14:46:16 scribenick: nicktr 14:46:23 agenda+ Proposal to take up Faciliated Payments Link in WPWG Charter 14:46:31 agenda+ Relationship to Web Monetization proposal 14:46:37 agenda+ Update on SPC browser based key implementation 14:46:43 agenda+ Update on the isSecurePaymentConfirmationAvailable API 14:47:27 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:47:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-minutes.html nicktr 14:56:50 zakim, who is here? 14:56:50 Present: (no one) 14:56:52 On IRC I see RRSAgent, bkardell_, dlehn, smcgruer_[EST], hadleybeeman, jets, nicktr, jthomas, slightlyoff, rbyers, tobie_, rouslan, ljharb, hober, benoit, Ian 14:59:06 present+ 14:59:20 present+ David_Benoit 14:59:52 present+ Nick_Telford-Reed 15:00:19 present+ Stephen_McGruer 15:00:50 present+ Sameer_Tare 15:00:59 present+ Gustavo_Kok 15:01:16 SameerT has joined #wpwg 15:01:58 present+ Kenneth_Diaz 15:02:11 present+ Praveena_Subrahmanyam 15:02:29 present+ Rogerio_Matsui 15:03:06 note to self: audio works better when you actually have it going to the speakers :facepalm: 15:03:12 present+ Slobadan 15:03:23 present+ Sharanya 15:03:30 zakim, who is here? 15:03:30 Present: benoit, David_Benoit, Nick_Telford-Reed, Stephen_McGruer, Sameer_Tare, Gustavo_Kok, Kenneth_Diaz, Praveena_Subrahmanyam, Rogerio_Matsui, Slobadan, Sharanya 15:03:33 On IRC I see SameerT, Zakim, RRSAgent, bkardell_, dlehn, smcgruer_[EST], hadleybeeman, jets, nicktr, jthomas, slightlyoff, rbyers, tobie_, rouslan, ljharb, hober, benoit, Ian 15:03:50 present+ Fahad 15:03:55 gkok has joined #wpwg 15:03:57 present+ Rouslan 15:04:38 JeanLuc has joined #WPWG 15:05:02 https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Agenda-20250213 15:05:15 KennethEntersekt has joined #wpwg 15:05:38 zakim, take up item 1 15:05:38 agendum 1 -- Proposal to take up Faciliated Payments Link in WPWG Charter -- taken up [from Ian] 15:06:13 praveenas has joined #wpwg 15:07:40 vasilii has joined #wpwg 15:09:32 present+ vasili 15:10:24 nicktr: should we include faciliated payment link in our next charter? 15:10:55 jean-luc: can you say a little more about how it works? 15:11:08 q+ 15:11:31 smcgruer_[EST]: I think it makes a lot of sense to link to payment handlers. There is no link currently in the spec 15:12:07 s/link currently/connection currently 15:12:09 rouslan: We had feedback from TAG about accessibility - how can we make payment handlers works with payment links 15:12:59 Strawpoll: Should we include facilitated payment links in the scope of our next charter? 15:13:08 +1 15:13:08 +1 15:13:14 +0 15:13:24 0 15:14:12 seeing no objections, we will carry payment links into the draft charter renewal 15:14:24 Zakim, take up item 2 15:14:24 agendum 2 -- Relationship to Web Monetization proposal -- taken up [from Ian] 15:15:03 q+ 15:15:34 q+ 15:15:47 rouslan: I am trying to guide the Egalia team who are doing experimentation in this space in Chromium. 15:16:03 ...I have suggested that they should come to the working group to refresh our knowledge 15:16:07 q- 15:16:16 ...otherwise I don't think many people have the knowledge to make the decision 15:16:22 ...I am waiting to hear 15:16:31 q? 15:16:37 ack rouslan 15:18:09 smcgruer_[EST]: Chrome has no official position on monetization 15:18:14 q? 15:18:35 nicktr: I suggest we wait for a presentation before we consider this 15:18:52 zakim, take up item 3 15:18:52 agendum 3 -- Update on SPC browser based key implementation -- taken up [from Ian] 15:19:42 smcgruer_[EST]: we talked a couple of weeks ago the prototype BBK 15:20:23 ...this is now available in Chrome Canary 15:21:04 ...and now includes the instantiation of a new BBK on a new instance of a browser that gets a synchronised passkey 15:21:20 ...and we are getting great questions already from implementers 15:23:18 JeanLuc: is the BBK created also with a synchronised passkey? 15:23:37 smcgruer_[EST]: yes 15:23:44 q+ : Can we please get the link for BBK information as part of the notes? 15:23:49 ...and it's currently only android 15:24:07 SameerT: is there a link on this that we can include in the minutes? 15:24:25 q? 15:24:29 ack SameerT 15:24:29 SameerT, you wanted to say Can we please get the link for BBK information as part of the notes? 15:24:29 https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/271 is the general issue 15:24:57 I will send an email to the group after the meeting with details on how to test BBKs in Chrome Canary on Android :) 15:25:38 nicktr: how many users are there on Canary? 15:25:50 smcgruer_[EST]: I don't think we say publicly, but it's a lot 15:25:52 q? 15:26:32 Zakim, take up item 4 15:26:33 agendum 4 -- Update on the isSecurePaymentConfirmationAvailable API -- taken up [from Ian] 15:27:02 https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/pull/233 15:27:26 smcgruer_[EST]: about a year about we specified a method for feature detection for SPC 15:27:46 ... "isSecurePaymentConfirmationAvailable API" 15:27:58 ...it is only a boolean TRUE/FALSE 15:28:24 ...it is now available in Chrome Canary 15:28:47 https://w3c.github.io/secure-payment-confirmation/#sctn-secure-payment-confirmation-available-api 15:29:35 q+ 15:29:37 ...and we should add an issue to consider whether it should be an ENUM rather than a boolean 15:30:07 SameerT: If I try to use this in 3DS challenge, can an iframe call this API? 15:30:26 smcgruer_[EST]: yes, if payment permission policy is enabled 15:30:32 q? 15:30:34 ack SameerT 15:31:25 smcgruer_[EST]: this is just "is SPC working" rather than "is the credential available" 15:31:43 q? 15:32:57 JeanLuc: do you think we should look at digital credential API and its alignment with web payments? 15:33:00 q+ 15:33:52 rouslan: I think that is a great idea - are you able to bring some information to a future meeting? 15:33:59 ack JeanLuc 15:34:05 JeanLuc: yes, I can 15:35:00 ...we could also include attributes 15:35:08 ...like age 15:36:01 https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.html#section-5-8 15:37:13 fahad: the digital (paymen) credential API work shares a lot with the web authentication - do you know which Chrome team are working on this? 15:37:24 smcgruer_[EST]: yes, and we are talking with them 15:37:46 nicktr: I think @rbyers is involved in both 15:38:32 JeanLuc: could we use something other that FIDO? 15:38:56 smcgruer_[EST]: That's a topic that Gerard is very interested in 15:39:15 ...of course there is a lot of the work happening away from W3C like OpenID 15:39:51 JeanLuc: I shared a link from OpenID verifiable presentations 15:40:20 fahad: the DPC API already does all of that. There is a conflict with SPC. 15:40:41 TallTed has joined #wpwg 15:40:55 ...we did a demo with DPC and we presented it at Fido last week 15:41:15 ...we would demo to the next meeting? 15:42:52 https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.html#section-5-8 15:43:06 https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/eudi-doc-architecture-and-reference-framework/blob/main/docs/architecture-and-reference-framework-main.md#4432-same-device-remote-presentation-flows 15:43:12 nicktr: that would great 15:44:16 agenda+ next meeting 15:44:23 zakim, take up item 5 15:44:23 agendum 5 -- next meeting -- taken up [from nicktr] 15:44:51 nicktr: our next meeting will be February 27th, 2025 15:46:35 ACTION: include demo from Mastercard on next agenda 15:46:51 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:46:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-minutes.html nicktr 15:47:42 RRSAgent, set logs public 15:48:29 rrsagent, bye 15:48:29 I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-actions.rdf : 15:48:29 ACTION: include demo from Mastercard on next agenda [1] 15:48:29 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2025/02/13-wpwg-irc#T15-46-35