15:00:57 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 15:01:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-irc 15:01:03 mjk has joined #wot-td 15:01:06 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 1 15:01:24 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan 15:02:11 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#February_12-13%2C_2025 15:02:17 present+ Michael_Koster 15:02:20 Mizushima has joined #wot-td 15:02:54 dape has joined #wot-td 15:02:54 present+ Daniel_Peintner 15:03:03 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 15:03:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:03:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:03:23 rrsagent, make log public 15:03:45 chair: Ege, Koster 15:03:47 rrsagent, make log public 15:05:22 present+ Jan_Romann 15:05:42 scribe: dape 15:05:53 rrsagent, please draft the minutes 15:05:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html JKRhb 15:07:34 TOPIC: Previous minutes 15:07:43 EK: We had only one session 15:07:56 ... 6 Feb -> https://www.w3.org/2025/02/06-wot-td-minutes.html 15:08:35 EK: spotted some issues with unwanted text in minutes 15:09:20 Kaz: just fixed 15:09:23 q? 15:09:33 EK: No other objections -> minutes are approved 15:09:52 TOPIC: Agenda Cleanup 15:09:59 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf/2024 15:10:05 EK: Did some clean-up fo2 2024 15:10:15 s/fo2/for 15:10:30 TOPIC: GitHub Project Cleanup 15:10:31 s/2024/2024 on the TD wiki above/ 15:10:33 https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80/views/1 15:11:19 s|https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80/views/1|-> https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/80/views/1 WoT TD Project| 15:11:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:11:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:11:33 EK: added labels and moved to "categorized" column 15:12:18 TOPIC: TD SpecWork 15:12:35 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2070 15:12:46 SUBTOPIC: Prettier issue 15:12:48 ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2070 15:12:51 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2074 15:13:04 EK: Daniel and I had the same issue 15:13:09 q+ 15:13:28 ... looked up possible causes 15:13:38 ... don't have access to the settings 15:13:58 q+ 15:14:00 ... got in contact with system teams 15:14:10 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 15:14:19 ... others like ARIA have similar issues 15:14:48 ... it means now, that formatting needs to be done locally 15:14:56 ... see https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2076 15:15:20 q+ 15:15:38 DP: wonder we should back again with system team 15:15:49 ... it worked before 15:15:56 EK: Yes, can follow-up 15:16:09 ... we don't have a real fix for now 15:16:11 q? 15:16:15 ack dape 15:16:28 Kaz: I am wondering about the potential cause 15:16:55 ... it might be some secret update mechanism 15:17:12 EK: Maybe also GitHub itself is changing 15:17:55 JR: I had this problem some months ago 15:18:09 ... the fix looks good to me 15:18:14 q? 15:18:19 q- 15:18:22 ack j 15:18:41 s/mechanism/the prettifyer mechanism/ 15:18:41 EK: Okay let's merge PR 2076 15:18:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:18:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:19:55 DP: will merge master in 2070 and we can see whether it works 15:20:30 SUBTOPIC: PR Template not working 15:20:36 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2077#issuecomment-2652285022 15:20:52 EK: we have that template 15:21:06 ... in VS code it shows up.. on GitHub it doesn't show up 15:21:11 ... not sure why? 15:21:21 ... does anyone have an idea? 15:21:36 ... otherwise will create issue to track it 15:22:14 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2078 15:22:22 i|https|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2077 PR 2077 - add required property key to example| 15:22:54 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2078|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/2078 Issue 2078 - PR Template not working| 15:23:22 TOPIC: Registry 15:23:28 https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22registry%20mechanism%22 15:23:43 EK: All open points are tracked with according label 15:24:00 ... with MK we went through all of them 15:25:01 ... e.g., question from Ben what happens with bindings for same protocol 15:25:34 ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/398 15:26:14 EK: only the 3rd problem is cirtical 15:26:14 s/Registry/Binding Registry/ 15:26:53 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22registry%20mechanism%22|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22registry%20mechanism%22 Binding Registry Issues| 15:27:02 s/MK/Koster/ 15:27:20 ... idea with Koster was to not allow 2 bindings with different flavors 15:27:50 ... we could add some checkpoints in review process 15:27:59 s|... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/398|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/398 wot-binding-templates Issue 398 - Handling Binding Submissions for Existing Bindings| 15:28:09 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:28:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:28:18 q? 15:28:57 EK: Are people fine with the proposal in issue 398 ? 15:29:10 q+ 15:29:11 ... then a PR can be made 15:29:22 Kaz: Direction should be okay 15:29:40 ... do we want to think about subprotocols as well ? 15:29:50 EK: Yes, are different documents 15:30:14 EK: Next is Summary document 15:30:14 s/as well ?/later?/ 15:30:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:30:23 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:30:29 ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/402 15:30:46 i|398|subtopic: Issue 398| 15:31:03 EK: We did have the consensus to have a summary document 15:31:03 i|Next is|subtopic: Issue 402| 15:31:27 ... custodian creates summary document 15:31:45 s|... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/402|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/402 wot-binding-templates Issue 402 - Summary Document Requirements| 15:31:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:31:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:31:56 ... it should contain abstract 15:32:12 s/subtopic: Issue 398// 15:32:29 i|Handling Binding Su|subtopic: Issue 398| 15:32:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:32:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:33:04 ... it should contain examples, but we cannot require it 15:33:22 ... it should contain access/usage restrictions 15:34:12 q+ 15:34:20 EK: does anyone object custodian posting summary document? 15:34:31 Kaz: Who will generate the text? 15:34:49 EK: Submitter will use use-cases form 15:35:17 s/use-cases form/a dedicated form 15:35:47 EK: Remarks on content of summary document? 15:35:49 q? 15:35:51 q- 15:36:09 q+ 15:36:14 CA: Purpose is to let us understand what the binding is about, right? 15:36:27 ... do we need something else beside abstract and example ? 15:36:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:36:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:37:04 EK: We should get idea what the binding is about 15:37:12 s/Submitter will/Submitters themselves/ 15:37:27 example summary document from IANA registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/1d-interleaved-parityfec 15:37:36 CA: short explainer? 15:37:38 q? 15:37:39 EK: Yes 15:38:26 Kaz: I am okay with the direction 15:38:38 ... we should provide our own examples description 15:38:47 ... how to use the form in general 15:38:58 CA: For example for HTTP 15:39:06 q? 15:39:07 q? 15:39:09 ack k 15:39:10 ack kaz 15:39:39 EK: I don't hear any objection .. mark as PR needed 15:40:14 SUBTOPIC: Issue 399 15:40:20 ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/399 15:40:50 ... we propose to close this issue since it is tackled by summary document 15:41:16 s|... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/399|-> ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/399 wot-binding-templates Issue 399 - Registry Entry Field on "Access and Usage Rights"| 15:41:27 s/... we pro/EK: we pro/ 15:41:28 SUBTOPIC: Issue 403 15:41:30 ... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/403 15:41:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:41:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:41:53 EK: How do we expect implementation experience 15:42:04 s/> ... h/> h/ 15:42:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:42:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:42:13 ... testing can happen over long time 15:43:21 s|... https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/403|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/403 wot-binding-templates Issue 403 - Stable/Current Status Requirements| 15:43:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:43:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:43:35 ... increases confidence of binding 15:44:02 ... STABLE state needs two separate code bases 15:44:06 q+ 15:44:35 ack dape 15:45:24 q+ 15:46:31 Kaz: Technically, asking for 2 interoperable implementations would be nice 15:46:54 ... but I am not really sure if we can / should require that for binding registry 15:47:18 EK: Too much requirement? 15:47:30 Kaz: Yes, not really sure if it is the right option 15:47:49 ... can talk with PLH and TAG 15:48:16 EK: Yes, but we are free in that regard 15:48:17 q? 15:48:24 ack kaz 15:48:55 MK: Broader review makes sense 15:49:01 EK: Agree 15:50:22 s/Yes, not/Possibly. I'm not/ 15:50:37 ... will add label "PR needed" 15:50:45 s/right option/right option at the moment because this is the first trial within W3C./ 15:51:30 s/can talk with/Let's talk with/ 15:51:33 EK: We have now 3 issues labelled with "PR needed" 15:51:53 ... anyone interested on working on it 15:52:02 ... I can take one 15:52:09 MK: I can take another one 15:52:54 i/Broader review/kaz: Right. However, this is the first trial within W3C for Registry to require 2 interoperable implementations. So we need to talk with PLH and TAG anyway./ 15:52:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:52:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:53:02 CA: I can the 3rd one 15:53:10 s/can the 3rd one/can take the 3rd one 15:53:16 i|Right|scribenick: kaz| 15:53:25 i|Broader review|scribenick: dape| 15:53:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:53:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:54:23 SUBTOPIC: Issue 404 15:54:28 > https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/404 15:54:53 EK: Is there any opinion? 15:55:08 ... require just JSON schema ? 15:55:15 s|> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/404|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/issues/404 wot-binding-templates Issue 404 - Required Machine Readable Documents for Registry Entries| 15:55:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:55:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:55:26 ... main question is about ontology file 15:56:02 ... not sure if anyone is capable providing it... since it is not needed when processing JSON only 15:56:38 CA: JSON-LD context would be more useful than ontologies 15:57:05 ... w.r.t. JSON Schema I don't have a clear answer 15:57:20 ... the current way we do it is rather hacky 15:58:06 ... e.g., redefining properties etc 15:58:31 ... for outsiders a form validation should be enough 15:59:07 q+ 15:59:40 ... JSON schema depends on what we allow bindings to do 16:00:41 Kaz: We should clarify what "machine-readable" means 16:01:29 ... 1 format might be enough 16:01:56 q- 16:02:32 [Adjourned] 16:02:44 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:02:45 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/02/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 17:14:24 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:32:27 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:37:34 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:57:47 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:13:34 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:25:38 Zakim has left #wot-td 18:30:04 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:47:52 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:06:59 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:15:27 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 19:33:40 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:52:36 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:55:39 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 20:54:26 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 21:11:24 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 21:31:40 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:08:31 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:15:30 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:20:52 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 22:30:06 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:30:21 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:36:14 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 23:54:07 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td