15:45:51 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 15:45:55 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/01/29-maturity-irc 15:45:55 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:45:56 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 15:46:25 meeting: Maturity Model Task Force 15:46:52 chair: David Fazio 15:47:56 Agenda+ New Business 15:47:56 Agenda+ Publication Strategy 15:47:56 Agenda+ Github Issue ##226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics 15:47:56 Agenda+ Github Issue #228 Determine if the proof points in the MM document and the assessment tool should be synced 15:47:56 /issues/228 -> #228 15:47:58 Agenda+ Github Issue #193 Apendix Roles need updating (feature request) 15:47:58 /issues/193 -> #193 15:58:11 Mark_Miller has joined #Maturity 16:00:55 present+ 16:01:25 janina has joined #maturity 16:01:58 neha has joined #maturity 16:02:05 present+ 16:02:08 Sheri_B-H has joined #maturity 16:02:15 present+ 16:02:16 jkline has joined #maturity 16:02:16 present+ 16:02:20 present+ 16:02:25 present+ 16:03:11 scribe+ 16:03:22 scribe+ 16:03:31 agenda? 16:03:32 /issues/228 -> #228 16:03:34 /issues/193 -> #193 16:03:51 Dr_Keith has joined #maturity 16:03:56 present+ 16:03:59 CharlesL has joined #maturity 16:04:06 present+ 16:04:13 zakim, next item 16:04:13 agendum 1 -- New Business -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:05:14 janina: IRC problems will hopefully be fixed tomorrow. Report disconnects after tomorrow to Janina and Mathew 16:06:54 zakim, next item 16:06:54 agendum 2 -- Publication Strategy -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:08:25 janina: made a few changes to the messaging 16:08:36 Fazio: also made some changes and sent PR to janina 16:09:43 janina: to proceed to management, we need a date that we anticipate being ready 16:10:19 Fazio: that largely depends on the spreadsheet. 16:10:38 janina: for 1.0 they have to be in sync (the spreadsheet and the narrative) 16:11:06 q? 16:11:06 queue+ 16:11:18 q- 16:11:27 ack jkline 16:11:47 jkline: we should be able to do it in the next couple of sessions 16:12:13 janina: that sounds like mid-Feb 16:12:43 jkline: added a new issue about financial planning and budgeting 16:13:15 Fazio: Stacey and Jason had previously mentioned that also. 16:13:31 q? 16:13:32 jkline and Fazio: we can review as new business at the next meeting 16:13:34 zakim, next item 16:13:34 agendum 3 -- Github Issue ##226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:14:10 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/226 16:14:11 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/226 -> Issue 226 Add an explanatory section on dimension goals and metrics (by jasonjgw) 16:14:22 Fazio: came from Jason, we have previously discussed it. Stacey has a proposed result 16:14:29 response* 16:14:54 Fazio: read the issue out loud 16:15:48 We're talking about adding a short message about the subjectivity of setting goals and metrics. 16:15:48 Here's a starting place. Wondering if this is on the right track to address the concern? Would love feedback and more insights to what you'd want to have added for clarity (especially for those who wouldn't be accessibility experts): 16:15:48 Creating accessibility metrics and goals is subjective. Similar to creating goals and metrics for products and features, you must consider the organization type, needs, maturity, staffing, funding, and yearly objectives. 16:17:25 queue+ 16:17:26 Sheri_B-H: Notes Jason was asking for dimension specific definitions 16:17:52 Sheri_B-H: Might we want to abstract this up earlier in the doc? So it shows up once and not multiple times in each dimension? 16:18:21 Sheri_B-H: Original goal was that this model would work from a single person shop to a multinational 16:18:32 Sheri_B-H: 16:18:38 We need to stay vague for that reason 16:18:45 Mark_Miller: 16:18:46 Agree 16:18:55 Sheri_B-H: Looking to make a proposal ... 16:21:15 Section 1.1 About 16:21:24 jefMuch in the About that won't be familiar -- perhaps a one line 16:21:31 Sheri_B-H: keep it vague, don't make it dimension specific 16:21:34 jefAgree we don't want to be dimension specific 16:21:54 jkline: has some language in his book he can donate 16:21:59 s/jefAgree/Jeff: Agree/ 16:22:16 present+ Jeff 16:22:20 q+ 16:22:28 ack je 16:22:33 ack sh 16:23:00 Sheri_B-H: Also comes down to org type: corporation departments also will have differences 16:23:22 Fazio: goal definition best left to the people doing the assessment 16:23:25 Sheri_B-H: Ex: Someone could use our model and create say "Health" maturity model--but that's not us 16:24:59 Neha has joined #maturity 16:27:17 Sheri_B-H0 has joined #maturity 16:27:36 scribe+ 16:28:16 Sheri and Jeff will write up an explanation 16:28:23 zakim, next item 16:28:23 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Neha 16:28:34 q? 16:28:41 ack jkline 16:28:45 zakim, next item 16:28:45 agendum 4 -- Github Issue #228 Determine if the proof points in the MM document and the assessment tool should be synced -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:28:45 /issues/228 -> #228 16:29:03 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/228 16:29:03 https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/228 -> Issue 228 Determine if the proof points in the MM document and the assessment tool should be synced (by jeffkline) 16:32:51 Neha has joined #maturity 16:33:02 scribe+ 16:35:43 rrsagent, make minutes 16:35:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/29-maturity-minutes.html Neha 16:36:31 CharlesL: Need to be sure if correct version of the excel sheet is being referred 16:37:48 CharlesL: One more column can be added with action items 16:38:41 Fazio: I think we are overthinking about proof points as they are just examples 16:39:19 jkline: I think proof points should be matched 16:41:16 Mark_Miller: Third column can be of determination saying what needs to be done 16:45:56 3.3 Support being edited on shared screen 16:58:33 CharlesL has left #maturity 16:58:44 Neha has left #maturity