16:55:54 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 16:55:59 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/01/22-aria-editors-irc 16:56:00 Zakim has joined #aria-editors 16:56:11 zakim, clear agenda 16:56:11 agenda cleared 16:56:49 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/ff35c0c2-a804-476f-a752-ffa112ee06eb/20250122T090000/ 16:56:49 clear agenda 16:56:49 agenda+ [new] -> aria#2411 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2411 aria.js: always add "Accessible Name Required" to characteristics tables 16:56:49 agenda+ [new] -> aria#2407 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2407 aria.js: drop "deprecated on this role" 16:56:50 agenda+ [new PR] [peter] -> aria#2226 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2226 remove spec specific css or inline it 16:56:51 agenda+ [revisit] -> core-aam#238 https://github.com/w3c/core-aam/issues/238 Consider listing known downstream AT support in AAMs 16:56:55 agenda+ [revisit] [james] -> aria#2396 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2396 respec fix for contributors 16:56:58 agenda+ [daniel] -> aria#2374 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2374 Enabling suggestions to update pull request branches 16:57:01 agenda+ [daniel] -> aria #2242 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2242 : Netlify to replace pr-review 16:57:04 agenda+ [peter] monorepo: aria-commmon -> aria#2230 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2230 16:57:07 agenda+ [peter] -> aria #2231 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2231 : turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec 16:57:10 agenda+ [rahim] -> aria #2287 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2287 : Add ReSpec aliasing clarity in README.me's "Editorial Documentation" section 16:57:14 agenda+ [james] -> aria PR #2136 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2136 Remove abbr elements 16:57:16 agenda+ [james] spec markup for advice for AT 16:57:36 zakim, start meeting 16:57:36 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:57:38 Meeting: ARIA Editors 16:57:43 rrsagent, make logs publich 16:58:16 rrsagent, make logs Public 16:59:23 pkra has joined #aria-editors 16:59:33 zakim, agenda? 16:59:33 I see 12 items remaining on the agenda: 16:59:34 1. [new] -> aria#2411 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2411 aria.js: always add "Accessible Name Required" to characteristics tables [from agendabot] 16:59:34 2. [new] -> aria#2407 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2407 aria.js: drop "deprecated on this role" [from agendabot] 16:59:34 3. [new PR] [peter] -> aria#2226 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2226 remove spec specific css or inline it [from agendabot] 16:59:37 4. [revisit] -> core-aam#238 https://github.com/w3c/core-aam/issues/238 Consider listing known downstream AT support in AAMs [from agendabot] 16:59:37 5. [revisit] [james] -> aria#2396 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2396 respec fix for contributors [from agendabot] 16:59:37 6. [daniel] -> aria#2374 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2374 Enabling suggestions to update pull request branches [from agendabot] 16:59:40 7. [daniel] -> aria #2242 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2242 : Netlify to replace pr-review [from agendabot] 16:59:40 8. [peter] monorepo: aria-commmon -> aria#2230 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2230 [from agendabot] 16:59:40 9. [peter] -> aria #2231 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2231 : turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec [from agendabot] 16:59:41 present+ 16:59:43 10. [rahim] -> aria #2287 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2287 : Add ReSpec aliasing clarity in README.me's "Editorial Documentation" section [from agendabot] 16:59:43 11. [james] -> aria PR #2136 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2136 Remove abbr elements [from agendabot] 16:59:43 12. [james] spec markup for advice for AT [from agendabot] 16:59:43 scribe+ 17:03:55 spectranaut_ has joined #aria-editors 17:14:08 zakim, next item 17:14:08 agendum 1 -- [new] -> aria#2411 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2411 aria.js: always add "Accessible Name Required" to characteristics tables -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:14:51 spectranaut_: let's do that. 17:14:56 pkra: has to wait for aria.js 17:15:08 ... oh, no. 17:15:20 jamesn: does this just add length? 17:16:04 ... other people might not like it. 17:16:21 dmontalvo: I'd like a rationale why this is important. 17:16:41 jamesn: where do we stop? e.g., children presentational is similar. 17:16:49 ... prohibited states & props are similar. 17:17:01 ... this is deliberate. Why do we want to change this? 17:17:30 spectranaut_: accessible name required is somewhat important. 17:17:45 jamesn: but doesn't the same apply to children presentational? 17:17:56 dmontalvo: it would also add more columns/row. 17:18:11 ... maybe better to clarify? 17:18:15 ... in prose? 17:18:39 jamesn: we wouldn't say "it's not required" in prose, would we? 17:19:46 spectranaut_: so we add it somewhere? 17:19:48 jamesn: it's missing in the bit from the top. 17:20:04 ... we have it for presentational children but not for accessible name required 17:20:09 spectranaut_: we should add it. 17:20:38 jamesn: right. we can also improve presentational children part. 17:20:48 ... we should go through them. 17:21:03 spectranaut_: so accessible name in 5.2.8 ? 17:21:11 jamesn: maybe. We should review it. 17:21:17 ... I don't understand some sections. 17:21:46 spectranaut_: that makes sense. 17:21:49 pkra: +1 17:22:26 jamesn: I'll write a response. 17:22:41 pkra: and agenda it? 17:22:43 spectranaut_: ys. 17:22:54 zakim, next item 17:22:54 agendum 2 -- [new] -> aria#2407 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2407 aria.js: drop "deprecated on this role" -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:23:42 pkra: cannot really land without the aria.js refactoring. 17:23:48 ... but: do we actually want this? 17:25:13 spectranaut_: so this would remove them? 17:25:15 pkra: yes. 17:25:37 jamesn: does HTML do this? 17:25:57 spectranaut_: I think removing this would mean browsers have to change how the process them. That seems like a blocker. 17:26:05 jamesn: yes, this seems like busy work. 17:26:32 dmontalvo: agree. reminds me of Wilco's comment on deprecation and stronger language. 17:27:07 jamesn: we could re-organize the tables, I guess. But it seems like busy work, too. 17:27:27 spectranaut_: should we put it on the agenda? 17:27:36 pkra: would be good to hear from implementors. 17:28:07 jamesn: I assume it's driven by not wanting to implement them in the new engine. 17:28:12 pkra: are there WPT test? 17:28:51 jamesn: good question. Seems difficult. 17:29:02 pkra: feels like a big web question - new engine, what to do? 17:30:27 jamesn: HTML has "obsolete but conforming". Will trigger warnings in checkers but authors can use. 17:30:37 ... non-conforming features must not be used. 17:31:02 ... it looks like it still does what to do. 17:31:48 zakim, next item 17:31:48 agendum 3 -- [new PR] [peter] -> aria#2226 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2226 remove spec specific css or inline it -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:56:15 pkra: [presented on findings: to recap, nested lists should move to accname; table styles should be replaced by TR stylesheet's .def, the rest can be removed. 17:56:52 ... in the discussion, jamesn raised concerns about making lists in characteristics table bulleted - but .def style seemed less problematic 17:57:10 ... jamesn also mentioned other table styles 17:57:26 ... overall, there was agreement to propose removing most styles. 17:57:43 ... pkra will move the PR forward to get it out of draft 17:57:48 zakim, end meeting 17:57:48 As of this point the attendees have been pkra 17:57:49 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 17:57:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/22-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim 17:57:57 I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:57:58 Zakim has left #aria-editors