12:09:43 RRSAgent has joined #coga 12:09:47 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-irc 12:09:47 RRSAgent, make logs Public 12:09:48 Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 12:09:53 clear agenda 12:09:56 clear q 12:10:06 q? 12:11:50 agenda+ Updates on user needs in issue papers 12:12:03 agenda+ Updates on coga comunity 12:12:14 agenda+ Updates on stucture and othe rgroups 12:12:23 agenda+ the W3C 12:12:23 Calendar 12:12:23 12:13:01 agenda+ WCAG paths. See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2025Jan/0011.html 12:13:36 agenda+ International suggestions 12:13:54 agenda+ Revisiting content usable V2 edits 12:13:54 12:13:54 proposal 11 12:14:06 agenda+ Discussing a name change for Making Content Useable (If time) 12:21:36 Agenda? 15:53:21 RRSAgent has joined #coga 15:53:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-irc 15:53:23 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:53:25 Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:53:30 RRSAgent, publish minutes 15:53:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-minutes.html Lisa 15:55:59 Regrets+ Eric, EA , Jennie 15:58:06 agenda+ next week do we have a meeting? 16:00:31 Rain has joined #coga 16:00:37 present+ 16:01:01 rashmi has joined #coga 16:01:28 present+ 16:01:34 q? 16:02:07 julierawe has joined #coga 16:02:10 agenda+ meetings this week 16:02:13 present+ 16:02:33 scribe+ Julierawe, Lisa 16:02:52 next item 16:03:11 Lisa We discussed last week about adding user needs to the issue papers 16:03:27 Lisa We talked more in the editors call on Thursday and agreed that it was a good idea to add user needs 16:03:56 Lisa To keep it simple, we will add a section called User Needs and fill it with the user needs we know already 16:04:26 Lisa We'll include an editors note asking for comments to see if readers want a section like this 16:04:32 next item 16:05:02 Rain I don't have an update yet on whether the coga community has updates on the user needs 16:05:16 Rain Kiki is preparing the community to present to us 16:05:37 Rain I expect to hear soon when Kiki and a community rep want to present to COGA 16:05:54 next item 16:06:07 Rain There is a call later this week 16:06:17 Rain We'll have the revised template ready to try out on the call later this week 16:06:27 Rain I'll send an email reminder to everyone today or tomorrow about the meeting 16:06:42 Rain This will be the Thursday subgroup meeting 16:06:53 next item 16:07:05 Lisa We also have Rashmi's mental health meeting and an editors call on Thursday before Rain's meeting 16:07:09 next item 16:07:31 Lisa W3C is changing the way we schedule meetings 16:07:38 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0e4ea52b-ee35-44da-aec7-22160a58aa3a/#next 16:07:48 Lisa Does anyone have problems with the calendar system? 16:07:50 ?+ 16:07:58 Lisa I don't know yet how to add events to the calendar 16:08:13 Lisa I'll add events for the subgroups 16:08:24 Lisa Do people want me to add the subgroups to the W3C calendar? 16:08:27 tiffanyburtin has joined #coga 16:08:37 present+ 16:08:45 Lisa Is it OK if I make a generic subgroup calendar event and people have to look at the subgroup page to know which subgroup is meeting that day? 16:08:51 q+ 16:09:38 DavidSwallow has joined #coga 16:09:40 julie: 1. old call info page is going away :( need to use w3c calander 16:09:56 Julie: find it confucing 16:10:18 to add events or join 16:11:13 2: i want to know what the group is each week - at least name of the subgroup meeting 16:11:26 Rain has joined #coga 16:11:39 lisa: list as the agenda? 16:11:55 q+ 16:12:23 Rain: i change the color if they are my subgroup 16:12:26 Rain On my calendar I change the color of the subgroup meetings for the ones that I need to be ready for and attentive to 16:12:34 ack next 16:12:40 ack next 16:12:46 Rain I think there is a benefit to finding a way to know which subgroup is meeting when 16:13:10 Rain The subgroup schedule — groups might switch, so there can be variability there 16:13:33 Rain I can imagine that it would get out of date if we try to schedule specific subgroup meetings instead of just on the wiki 16:14:16 Rain The other option is to make it more regular. Right now it's based on availability. If we shifted it to every subgroup meets every three weeks. maybe it would be easier to know which group is going when 16:14:46 Lisa Maybe if we have a list in the calendar invite or a link to the wiki page that says which groups are meeting when 16:14:53 q+ 16:15:00 ack next 16:15:45 +1 to a Google calendar 16:15:53 Lisa We could keep the google calendar invites and have it link to the W3C calendar 16:16:31 q+ 16:16:49 https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0e4ea52b-ee35-44da-aec7-22160a58aa3a/#next 16:17:00 Lisa With this new system, we could make a similar page—the problem is you have to log in 16:17:10 ack next 16:17:15 Lisa Wherever we put the zoom information, people will have to log in 16:17:43 tiffanyburtin I block off my Thursdays on my calendar because I forget which subgroups are meeting on which Thursdays 16:17:57 tiffanyburtin But that leads to overwhelm so I'd like an easy link to which subgroups are meeting when 16:18:09 Lisa We send emails as well 16:18:40 Lisa We want to add a Thursday subgroup event to the W3C calendar 16:18:56 Lisa I will also send an email to see if anyone has trouble logging in 16:19:01 next item 16:19:24 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTbw8Kt2BrYyUTwO0q3PD3XT353s7AXmYysosYBaR2A/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.pmn8vobaazf2 16:20:31 wcag is working out how to get the rest of wcag 3 drafted 16:20:48 deviding the work into topics or paths 16:21:00 we want one coga person at least per path 16:21:45 prefer one main rep and more as participents to take a look at the draft and flag issues 16:22:01 we are all feeling streched 16:22:09 q+ 16:22:22 jan 21 deadline for sign ing up 16:22:27 q+ 16:22:31 sign up via survey 16:22:39 ack next 16:23:13 how long is this? 16:23:23 first draft is 6 month 16:23:50 julie: coga perspective will be good 16:23:56 in each path 16:24:53 q+ 16:25:05 ack next 16:25:30 Rain In terms of whether someone is a COGA rep or a COGA participant, how is that being determined? 16:25:58 julie: participent meens that you wont need to go every week 16:26:06 try and reduce the stress 16:27:04 can also do it asyncronosly 16:27:43 lisa: what do we have so far 16:29:31 tiffanyburtin I can help coordinate, but I can't be the main rep for any groups 16:29:44 Lisa People can be quite active and also meeting a meeting 16:29:52 Lisa We can see what we've got 16:30:01 q? 16:30:06 Lisa It's better to have people participate 16:30:12 q- 16:30:14 rashmi I can participate asynchronously 16:30:26 rashmi Time zones make it hard 16:30:34 present+ 16:30:49 rashmi I can work on help and errors and structure and cognitive support 16:31:19 rashmi Mental health should also be included 16:31:29 Lisa Cognitive support includes mental health support 16:31:42 I can set up the COGA Slack channel again. For some reason it disappeared. I can also create sub groups to have an easy quick conversation method to coordinate attendance. 16:32:49 Resharing the google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTbw8Kt2BrYyUTwO0q3PD3XT353s7AXmYysosYBaR2A/edit?tab=t.0 16:32:55 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTbw8Kt2BrYyUTwO0q3PD3XT353s7AXmYysosYBaR2A/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.pmn8vobaazf2 16:33:03 Fill in this google doc so COGA members can see where there are gaps 16:33:23 also fill in survey 16:33:29 q- 16:34:14 DavidSwallow I could be on interaction and AT support 16:36:01 Please fill in this AG survey by January 21st: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Path_Participation_25/ 16:36:17 The survey asks for times you're available to meet 16:36:33 Lisa We need more COGA participation but it's looking good 16:36:51 Lisa We can also point the groups to COGA patterns that we've already done 16:36:54 next item 16:37:05 close item 6 16:37:09 rashmi has joined #coga 16:37:27 Lisa Jan not here so moving on to the next agenda item 16:37:43 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xnoNFwfjJZbfadFiU-qOW49n4-gODbd_4ff5UDyYFTM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.z4jafdjuv6sd 16:38:12 Lisa Proposal 11 has changed a lot and no longer what the group approved, so we're bringing it back for approval 16:38:15 agenda+ 16:38:28 agenda? 16:39:00 close item 10 16:39:29 Q? 16:39:49 rashmi Proposal 11 is "Make links and controls labeling explicit" 16:40:07 rashmi The yellow highlighting shows what has changed 16:40:23 Labels, linked text and accessible names for links and controls are easy to understand, clear and unambiguous. 16:40:23 Text labels are visible, unless a ubiquitous, commonly known icon is used. 16:40:23 The relationship between controls and their label should be clear. 16:40:54 rashmi We also added three paragraphs at the end of "How it helps" section: 16:40:55 Links and controls should have clear visible labels. Note that labels can be available through a personalization setting. However, if controls are not common or their usage is not completely clear, we recommend clear, unambiguous, and visible labels that are clearly associated with the controls. For example, a page may have multiple search options 16:40:55 for different regions.Providing clear, unique and visible labels help users in knowing the purpose of different search options. 16:40:55 Navigational elements should be easy to understand without needing to guess. Making the text of hyperlinks as clear as possible also reduces cognitive load. This helps many groups including people with cognitive and mental health impairments. 16:40:55 For example a person living with SMI (Severe Mental Illness) and Schizophrenia is using a mental health app to track their mood and help them live independently. The lack of labels and clear link text makes them anxious about what they are pressing. They stop using the app as it makes them feel worse. 16:41:40 q+ 16:42:20 ack next 16:42:35 rashmi We added one more item to the "Use" section: Links and controls that have properly associated, clear, unambiguous, visible labels. 16:42:55 rashmi We also add one more item to the "Avoid" section: Lack of labels and clear link text. 16:43:13 Jan has joined #coga 16:43:17 Lisa Is it enough to have an explanation of what the different icons are? Is that enough? 16:43:20 present+ 16:44:00 Lisa Saying "text labels are visible" but sometimes you're introducing a new icon 16:44:21 Lisa Are we OK to say this as a requirement when we don't know it's always true? 16:44:31 q+ 16:44:37 q+ 16:44:41 ack next 16:44:47 Lisa Is this widely appropriate? "Text labels are visible, unless a ubiquitous, commonly known icon is used." 16:44:56 Rain What's written here would be difficult to explain 16:45:10 Rain I think we need a clear rubric for when a text label is required and when is an icon OK 16:45:44 Rain What are the factors you can use to make the decision? A rubric that would help explain what is meant by "ubiquitous, commonly known icon" 16:46:01 Rain A shopping cart may be known in some countries but not others 16:46:19 Rain A magnifying glass may be consistently used for search 16:46:56 Rain We could be more actionable if we say "Here's when you can use an icon if an explanation can't be provided" 16:47:07 Lisa1 has joined #coga 16:47:12 ack next 16:47:14 Jan Apologies for late arrival 16:47:28 Jan This is a broader issue that is going to affect a lot of disabilities 16:47:40 Jan For example, someone who uses text to speech 16:48:03 Jan Providing a tooltip helps with lots of disabilities, not just cognitive 16:48:33 Lisa It does say labels should have accessible names 16:48:44 Lisa What I'm hearing is there is no consensus on this draft 16:49:18 Lisa Sounds like we're not close to consensus. We really need to define when text labels need to be visible 16:49:52 rashmi It is quite tricky 16:50:03 Lisa1 We need to do a call to brainstorm and draft it 16:50:23 Lisa1 When we have everyone agree on the draft, then we'll bring it back to full COGA for approval 16:50:48 Lisa1 Jan, do you want to talk about internationalization? 16:50:54 agenda? 16:50:59 Jan Quick update: We are meeting with the community group this Wednesday 16:51:04 close item 7 16:51:13 Jan We're going to focus on looking at the personas and getting a first pass on those 16:51:23 Q+ 16:51:25 Jan We did finish going over all the success criteria 16:51:47 Jan In early February we could do a more detailed review in this meeting 16:52:04 Jan In the interim, we do have all the feedback in the spreadsheet and we could look at it in the editor's call 16:52:21 Jan By "success criteria," I mean the "patterns" 16:52:42 Jan I can't attend next Monday's meeting but can discuss this Thursday at the editor's call 16:53:34 Lisa1 We'll talk more on Thursday, maybe 1st hour will be mental health pull request and issues papers and the second hour can be internationalization feedback 16:54:02 Jan I can only do 9am on Thursday 16:54:13 q+ 16:54:50 Lisa1 Next week is Martin Luther King Day in the US. Who is able to make the call? 16:54:52 Not me 16:55:17 tiffanyburtin has joined #coga 16:55:20 UK here, I can. 16:55:33 Next week's call - I will show up if I can get out of my client meeting, but will be late. 16:55:40 RRSAgent, publish minutes 16:55:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-minutes.html Lisa1 16:55:58 Q- 16:56:01 I got kicked off. I may miss next Monday due to a health procedure. I'm unsure. 16:56:31 Lisa1 We need to schedule a separate call to redraft Proposal 11 about making links and labels explicit 16:57:02 Who can attend COGA meeting on Monday, which is Martin Luther King Day? 16:57:04 -1 16:57:10 0 16:57:23 DavidSwallow +1 16:57:54 Jan Will try but will be late on Monday 16:57:55 Links and Labels - yes depending on when the call is 16:58:12 RRSAgent, publish minutes 16:58:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-minutes.html Lisa1 16:58:20 -1 to Monday 16:58:49 Lisa1 Not sure if we'll have quorum. I'll email the list and see if anyone can join. 16:59:24 Jan If there is no meeting on Monday, maybe that's a time when you and I can connect about the internationalization feedback 16:59:37 Lisa1 We can try to see if we can do it on Thursday 16:59:42 rrsagent, make minutes 16:59:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-minutes.html julierawe 17:00:32 Lisa1 We can try to talk about internationalization feedback at Thursday's editors call and if not, maybe Lisa and Jan can discuss on Monday/Martin Luther King Day 17:00:36 rrsagent, make minutes 17:00:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2025/01/13-coga-minutes.html julierawe 17:33:35 jamesn has joined #COGA