13:59:26 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 13:59:31 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-irc 13:59:52 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF - Slot 2 14:03:20 rrsagent, make log public 14:03:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:03:26 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:03:42 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima 14:04:47 dape has joined #wot-td 14:05:09 present+ Daniel_Peintner 14:05:14 Mizushima has joined #wot-td 14:05:22 mjk has joined #wot-td 14:05:25 scribenick: mjk 14:08:09 q+ 14:08:41 q- 14:09:37 cris has joined #wot-td 14:09:57 topic: Cancellations 14:10:26 Slot 2 call on Dec 19 will be canceled while Slot 1 call on Dec 18 will be held. 14:12:06 topic: minutes review 14:12:23 https://www.w3.org/2024/11/21-wot-td-minutes.html 14:12:39 s|https://www.w3.org/2024/11/21-wot-td-minutes.html|-> https://www.w3.org/2024/11/21-wot-td-minutes.html Nov-21| 14:14:07 ek: any comments or corrections? 14:14:20 ... no comments, minutes approved 14:14:39 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 14:14:50 chair: Ege 14:14:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:14:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:15:03 q+ 14:15:09 present+ Jan_Romann 14:15:24 i|Slot 2 call|scribenick: kaz| 14:15:31 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 14:15:34 i|any comme|scribenick: mjk| 14:15:36 present+ Jan_Romann 14:15:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:15:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:15:47 topic: cancellations 14:16:09 q+ 14:16:09 dape: we need to cancel more than the Dec. 19th call 14:16:12 q- 14:16:15 ack d 14:16:18 ack dape 14:16:19 ... also January 6th 14:16:57 s/cancellations/cancellations - revisited/ 14:17:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:17:16 ek: propose to cancel 25+26 December and 1+2 January 14:17:22 ... any objections? 14:17:44 ... no objections, so we will cancel these dates 14:18:05 ... (cancelled in WoT calendar) 14:18:45 q+ 14:19:08 topic: initial connection 14:19:10 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2058 14:19:19 q- 14:19:40 ek: Review PR #2058 14:19:48 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2058|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2058 PR 2058 - Initial Connection Feature Description| 14:20:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:20:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:22:00 ... ek: the changes include feature descriptions and schema updates making validation more difficult 14:22:04 q+ 14:23:04 ... There is more to TD validation than JSON Schema validation 14:23:33 dape: maybe there can be if-conditions in JSON Schema 14:24:08 ack dape 14:24:12 ... If the expanded TD works, we could requirer expanded TDs in the workflow 14:24:24 q+ 14:24:29 ek: we will need to refine the definition of expanded 14:24:57 ... for example, does connectiondefinitions need to be expanded? 14:25:06 +1 for the second one 14:25:12 +1 as well 14:25:15 ... all the common definitions will need to be expanded 14:26:31 kaz: The whole WG needs to think about how to test this, whether it is too complicated for implementation 14:26:44 ek: I have a similar concern 14:27:05 ... some examples do get complicated 14:27:30 ... we need more experience and see if we can write the schema 14:27:34 q+ 14:27:46 kaz: we need more test cases 14:28:00 ... maybe we can do the expansion in thingmodel 14:28:10 ek: agree 14:28:27 ack k 14:29:05 cris: how will this impact typescript typing? 14:29:23 q+ 14:29:36 ... it may break the autogeneration 14:30:02 ... we need more concrete experience 14:31:04 ek: in the worst case, the schema constraints will need to be relaxed 14:31:25 ack c 14:32:02 ek: if someone wants to work on this, please let me know and go ahead 14:33:21 dape: maybe the more flexible format is for human readability, the full expansion is more machine friendly and will allow rigorous validation 14:33:49 ek: expansion should then be required for machine consumption 14:35:11 ek: any other comments? 14:35:16 q? 14:35:22 ack dape 14:35:45 topic: registry 14:36:02 subtopic: PR #378 14:36:23 ek: this was discussed in the F2F 14:37:01 ... there are only a few TODOs left, let's start with the simple ones 14:37:49 ... does the submission document be required to follow W3C submission rules, e.g. use respec 14:38:06 s/does/will 14:38:27 ... also copyright requirements 14:38:29 i|this was|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/pull/378 wot-binding-templates PR 378 - Registry Requirements Update| 14:38:31 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:38:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:39:05 ... there seems to be preliminary consensus that this is not a strict requirement 14:39:18 q+ 14:39:22 q+ 14:39:24 ek: any opinions? 14:39:24 s/topic: initial connection/topic: TD - Initial Connection/ 14:39:37 s/topic: registry/topic: Binding - Registry/ 14:39:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:39:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:40:00 jan: should the binding document be required to be freely available under a permissive license? 14:40:32 ek: specifically not requiring payment 14:40:37 jan: yes 14:40:37 q? 14:40:41 q- 14:41:14 cris: second Jan's point, and OK with a URL that points to the document 14:41:38 ... and to the specific section 14:41:50 ek: this wouldn't work for PDF 14:42:08 cris: we could recommend HTML if a subsection reference is needed 14:42:30 q+ 14:42:34 ack c 14:43:13 dape: we also need to require the documents be stable 14:43:32 ack dape 14:43:51 ek: link and date of the link, both link and content can not change 14:45:00 ek: regarding permissive license,we may not be able to mandate free availability, for example ISO charges for documents 14:45:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:45:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:45:26 ... at least we could require a copy provided to the W3C WG 14:45:41 s/W3C WG/W3C WoT WG 14:45:50 eg: other opinions? 14:46:07 ... what are requirements for IANA? 14:46:36 cris: don't remember any constraints on availability, but will double check 14:47:17 ... restricted document access is not aligned with the open web principles 14:47:41 ... but we may need to be more industry friendly 14:48:32 eg: The Profinet binding is openly aavailable but the Profinet protocol itself is a restricted document 14:50:24 mjk: we want to be inclusive, maybe this is more important than W3C policy alignment 14:51:14 ek: what are the restrictions on the matter protocol? 14:52:22 q+ 14:53:04 mjk: device manufacture may require IP agrfeement and joining CSA for IP access, but web APIs are not covered 14:53:12 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:53:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:53:32 s/agrfee/agree/ 14:53:39 cris: there are restrictions on protocol deployment in many specs, e.g. LoRA and Sigfox 14:53:58 q+ 14:54:18 ack c 14:54:34 ... we should require that at least web clients are not restricted, and servers also preferred 14:55:19 ek: we should look at commercial licensing restrictions vs. restrictions on the information 14:56:03 ... there may be some basic requirements 14:56:38 kaz: there might be some practical industry knowledge about how to interoperate with Matter 14:57:20 ... we could VC as a security/permissions layer if needed 14:57:47 q? 14:57:49 ack k 14:57:50 ... if complicated dat aaccess control is needed 14:58:04 ek: any other opinions? 14:58:38 q+ 14:58:43 ... the only think it seems we can mandate is the binding document itself 14:59:08 ... and make strong recommendations about protocol 14:59:20 s/we could/In addition, we could use/ 14:59:30 s/dat aa/data a/ 14:59:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:59:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 14:59:49 cris: there will not be general interoperability if we only mandate the document availability 14:59:50 s/eg:/ek:/g 15:00:22 ek: it's already a win if there is a binding document available 15:00:50 cris: this is a big decision and should be taken up in the main call with the larger group 15:01:09 ek: thank you all for the good comments and good discussion 15:01:14 is there AOB? 15:01:25 s/is/... is 15:01:31 ek: adjourned 15:01:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:01:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/12-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:02:12 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 15:17:44 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 15:34:46 EgeKorka_ has joined #wot-td 15:52:43 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 16:12:20 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 16:29:34 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 16:50:37 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 16:59:58 Zakim has left #wot-td 17:09:22 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:19:10 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:30:21 benfrancis has joined #wot-td 17:37:00 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 17:57:07 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:15:04 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:20:11 EgeKorka_ has joined #wot-td 18:20:44 benfrancis has joined #wot-td 18:22:16 benfrancis has joined #wot-td 18:39:45 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 18:57:55 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td 19:16:34 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-td