16:57:48 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors
16:57:52 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/12/11-aria-editors-irc
16:57:52 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
16:57:53 <Zakim> Meeting: ARIA Editors
17:03:57 <spectranaut_> spectranaut_ has joined #aria-editors
17:14:30 <pkra> pkra has joined #aria-editors
17:14:54 <pkra> present+
17:19:50 <pkra> scribe+ pkra
17:19:56 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:19:56 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- [new-ish] [daniel] -> aria#2374 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2374 Enabling suggestions to update pull request branches -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:20:05 <scott> scott has joined #aria-editors
17:20:11 <jamesn> jamesn has joined #aria-editors
17:21:00 <pkra> dmontalvo: didn't want to turn this on without asking.
17:21:19 <jamesn> agenda?
17:21:45 <pkra> ... I think it's a good option.
17:21:50 <pkra> spectranaut_: can we do this by rebasing?
17:21:55 <pkra> dmontalvo: yes.
17:22:00 <pkra> spectranaut_: let's do it.
17:22:02 <pkra> all: +1
17:22:07 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:22:07 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- [new-ish] [james] -> aria#2226 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2226 remove spec specific css or inline it -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:23:59 <pkra> jamesn: yeah, I never got to it. If someone wants it sooner, please make a PR.
17:25:23 <pkra> ... quick fix would be removing them an inlining the relevant ones, eliminate or adjust colors.
17:25:37 <pkra> pkra: CSS light-dark is probably reasonable already.
17:26:10 <pkra> ... I'll keep this on the agenda.
17:26:23 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:26:23 <Zakim> agendum 3 -- [new-ish] -> core-aam#238 https://github.com/w3c/core-aam/issues/238 Consider listing known downstream AT support in AAMs -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:27:16 <pkra> pkra: we discussed this last time, wanting to give it more time.
17:27:37 <pkra> jamesn: let's skip to next meeting..
17:27:49 <pkra> ... I think it's more appropriate for ARIA than core-aam
17:29:00 <pkra> pkra: I feel like it's more caniuse-like.
17:29:03 <pkra> ... but that's hard to maintain.
17:29:18 <pkra> scotto: I worry it's hard to define what "supported" means.
17:30:23 <pkra> jamesn: it seems before we can do this, we'd need to decide what we expect to do with something.
17:32:31 <pkra> pkra: it feels like APG territory. ARIA is about flexibility and sometimes unusual patterns. Think about how activeDescendants enables complex behavior like data viz. That's hard to reflect.
17:32:42 <pkra> spectranaut_: there's a  recent comment from Aaron.
17:32:54 <pkra> scott: I spoke to him about it a bit.
17:33:46 <pkra> ... he documents a lot of the decision processes he's involved in. Without them it's hard to tell what the history of a feature idea is.
17:34:05 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:34:05 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- [question: re-open?] -> aria#2048 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2048 deprecating aria-errormessage -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:35:02 <pkra> pkra: I just wanted to double check that there's nothing left in the discussion we might want to pursue elsewhere.
17:36:16 <pkra> spectranaut_: I think it's ok closed
17:36:26 <pkra> scott: maybe we should open APG issue to document things better.
17:36:54 <pkra> pkra: I can open one.
17:37:01 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:37:01 <Zakim> agendum 5 -- [updatd] [peter] -> aria#2338 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2338 - PR on wiki archiving -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:38:04 <dmontalvo> s/updatd/updated/
17:41:39 <pkra> scotto: we can archive the css-aam page
17:41:44 <pkra> jamesn: I've removed my page
17:41:57 <pkra> spectranaut_: let's archive the hidden tests but not use "test"
17:42:01 <pkra> pkra: will do and then merge.
17:42:04 <pkra> zakim, next item
17:42:04 <Zakim> agendum 6 -- [daniel] -> PR #2288 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2288 : Fix commit log for specs with monorepo -- taken up [from agendabot]
17:43:21 <pkra> dmontalvo: the agendum title is not quite right. this PR is about the participants
17:43:25 <pkra> spectranaut_: I have to re-review
17:43:28 <pkra> pkra: I have to review
17:43:37 <pkra> jamesn: I have to get back to the contributor issue.
17:45:44 <pkra> dmontalvo: the netlify preview works statically now.
17:45:50 <pkra> ... it wasn't working with dynamic respec
17:45:53 <pkra> spectranaut_: this looks good.
17:46:01 <pkra> pkra: should we review the preview HTML carefully?
17:46:30 <pkra> dmontalvo: it should work but sure.
17:47:29 <pkra> pkra: looks good. It's different sets of contributors.
17:47:51 <pkra> jamesn: right that's unfortunately because it's not quite right yet. it's actually pulling in the old repositories.
17:48:09 <scott> scott has joined #aria-editors
17:48:13 <pkra> ... hence my respec work to get it to pull in subfolder structure.
17:48:35 <pkra> ... I have respec backend worked out. the web components was failing for ARIA only.
17:49:34 <pkra> pkra: let's merge this though?
17:50:05 <pkra> jamesn: yes. we should make an issue for the other part if there isn't one already.
17:51:07 <pkra> pkra: i'll merge and file an issue if I can't find it.
17:52:20 <pkra> zakim, end meeting
17:52:20 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been pkra
17:52:21 <Zakim> RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2
17:52:23 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/12/11-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim
17:52:30 <Zakim> I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent.  Goodbye
17:52:31 <Zakim> Zakim has left #aria-editors