16:56:10 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 16:56:14 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/11/12-aria-editors-irc 16:56:39 zakim, clear agenda 16:56:39 agenda cleared 16:56:47 agenda+ [new-ish] aria#2338 - PR on wiki archiving 16:56:47 agenda+ [ready?] aria #2312 / #2318 / PR #2321: PR naming/labelling convention 16:56:47 agenda+ aria #2238 / PR #2288: Fix commit log for specs with monorepo 16:56:47 - resolves aria-common #109 / aria#2288 remove/replace aria-wg-active.md and aria-wg-participants.md 16:56:48 agenda+ [rahim] aria #2287: Add ReSpec aliasing clarity in README.me's "Editorial Documentation" section 16:56:48 agenda+ [peter] aria #2231: turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec 16:56:48 agenda+ [status?] aria #2242: Netlify to replace pr-review 16:56:48 agenda+ [scott] aria #2228: re-direct "moved" PRs after merge (html-aam left with 1 PRs) 16:56:49 agenda+ [james] aria PR #2136 Remove abbr elements 16:56:49 agenda+ [peter] aria-common #104 & PR #106: modernizing aria.js 16:56:49 - [dependent] automation and synonyms (via aria #2073) 16:56:49 agenda+ [james] spec markup for advice for AT 16:56:49 agenda+ core-aam#238 16:57:07 zakim, start meeting 16:57:07 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:57:09 Meeting: ARIA Editors 17:00:13 spectranaut_ has joined #aria-editors 17:00:24 pkra has joined #aria-editors 17:00:33 present+ 17:00:39 Am I in the wrong zoom? 17:03:22 zakim, start meeting 17:03:22 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:03:23 Meeting: ARIA Editors 17:03:26 scribe+ pkra 17:04:02 agenda? 17:05:13 dmontalvo: are we ok with re-using the zoom? 17:05:29 jamesn: sounds ok. 17:05:32 pkra: +1 17:06:25 dmontalvo: I'll update the future invites. And set up the other week. 17:06:44 zakim, next item 17:06:44 agendum 1 -- [new-ish] aria#2338 - PR on wiki archiving -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 17:06:55 pkra: this dropped off the radar. 17:07:34 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2338 17:09:17 ... could someone take a look at that? 17:10:02 ... some items are unchecked. Feedback would be good. 17:10:07 jamesn: will take a look 17:10:08 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:10:08 Present: pkra 17:10:30 present+ Daniel, Valerie, James 17:10:56 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:10:56 Present: pkra, Daniel, Valerie, James 17:12:05 spectranaut_: I like to keep the old TPAC and F2F planning docs in the wiki . 17:12:09 pkra: sounds good. 17:12:19 jamesn: yes, let's move those out of the PR. 17:12:21 pkra: will do. 17:12:25 ... and ping you. 17:12:48 zakim, next item. 17:12:48 agendum 2 -- [ready?] aria #2312 / #2318 / PR #2321: PR naming/labelling convention -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 17:13:51 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2312 17:14:42 pkra: can we close this? 17:15:38 dmontalvo: I tested this on my fork. It worked well, incl. changing labels when editing PRs. 17:15:43 jamesn: let's close. 17:16:04 zakim, next item 17:16:04 agendum 3 -- aria #2238 / PR #2288: Fix commit log for specs with monorepo -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 17:17:28 jamesn: right. Still mostly there. Except for aria because it doesn't have its own folder. I'll need to look into path resolution. 17:17:41 ... but otherwise it pulls things out correctly. 17:17:56 zakim, next item 17:17:56 agendum 4 -- [rahim] aria #2287: Add ReSpec aliasing clarity in README.me's "Editorial Documentation" section -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 17:18:12 pkra: rahim sent regrets. Moving on. 17:18:15 zakim, close this item. 17:18:15 agendum 4 closed 17:18:16 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:18:16 5. [peter] aria #2231: turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec [from dmontalvo] 17:18:19 Zakim, next item 17:18:19 agendum 5 -- [peter] aria #2231: turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 17:19:21 zakim, close this item. 17:19:21 agendum 5 closed 17:19:22 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:19:22 6. [status?] aria #2242: Netlify to replace pr-review [from dmontalvo] 17:19:42 spectranaut_: about new meeting time. Scott had sent potential alternatives. 17:21:15 ... would those work for others? 17:21:24 dmontalvo: Wed would work 17:21:26 jamesn: same. 17:21:28 pkra: +1 17:21:41 jamesn: let's propose Wed, 12pm Eastern. 17:21:51 spectranaut_: I'll write an email. 17:22:12 pkra: can we close https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2070 17:22:50 jamesn has joined #aria-editors 17:24:31 Should we discuss https://github.com/w3c/core-aam/issues/238 here? 17:25:01 ... or next time? 17:25:24 jamesn: I'm leaning towards having something in aria proper. 17:25:51 ... one audience is web authors so they can test that it works for them. 17:26:11 ... AAM's are a bit removed from authors. 17:26:15 spectranaut_: makes sense. 17:27:10 pkra: we could pull things in from AAMs? 17:27:19 spectranaut_: but it's about AT features. 17:27:23 pkra: oh, right. 17:27:29 spectranaut_: seems fine in ARIA spec. 17:27:45 ... problem is expressing support more granularly. 17:28:13 ... e.g. role=button. there are several in AAMs (pressed etc). so in the section it'd be complicated. 17:29:42 pkra: it seems like authors really want something like caniuse or mdn. I don't see how ARIA can solve that. 17:30:19 jamesn: authors really need something to track what is fully working. 17:30:49 ... comes down to notes we've discussed, e.g., for support of WIP. 17:32:51 pkra: there's a recent comment from aaron. 17:32:57 ... suggesting a deep dive. 17:38:32 spectranaut_: let's revisit at next meeting. 17:40:50 zakim, end meeting 17:40:50 As of this point the attendees have been pkra, Daniel, Valerie, James 17:40:51 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 17:40:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/11/12-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim 17:40:59 I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:41:00 Zakim has left #aria-editors